Report a Comment

FWIW, I got the text change in the Comp. Plan from suggesting TDM be considered in PUD matters, to requiring it.

But that was a small small win, because I advocated for its requirement in most building regulation-planning-zoning matters, for everything except single family/flats. So I consider the TDM requirement for PUDs to be not much more than a sop...

I did submit an amendment to the Comp. Plan for this, in the recent collection of amendments. We'll see if it goes anywhere. I would argue that the way that the Transportation Element reads in the Comp. Plan that they have the authority to require TDM planning, but the OP and the DDOT don't interpret the language the same way I do.

by Richard Layman on Jul 16, 2009 2:25 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam