Report a Comment

As I said before, Giant could have built a significantly bigger and more improved store as a matter of right anytime over the past 10 years. There's been no compromise at all.
What you want is not a compromise at all. That's just something you want, and Giant doesn't. When you compromise, you have to give something up too, not just your opponent.

EXACTLY. What has Giant given up in this debate? The plan for the store and surrounding keeps getting bigger and bigger. Giant has not been asked to make a single concession or provide a single amenity as part of the development. It's shocking. The zoning board has ignored the neighborhood so now the neighborhood has to go to court. It could have been avoided if Giant had been willing to compromise.

by pdl999 on Sep 12, 2009 7:40 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam