Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Squalish, I was trying to make the point that you can't use numbers in your decision making ... because what is behind the numbers is 'apples and oranges' ... and comparing them is like 'adding apples and oranges'.

Btw, I understand where you're coming from as far as 'recreational priority' but I don't agree with the assumption that recreational priority is the NPS' main mandate or even a priorty mandate. Were that the case, the number of visitors to places such as Yellowstone wouldn't be limited so as to minimize the impact of humans on that fragile land. I haven't (yet) looked up their mission statement on their website, but I'd bet it says something to the effect of 'protecting' national natural resources ...

by Lance on Sep 30, 2009 11:30 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam