Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Weekly Q&A | Add Dr. Gridlock: Twitter | RSS | phoneLocal/Commuter Alerts
Search This Blog

Recent Posts

* Tips for travelers on their way home
* Hiker-biker bridge moving forward in Montgomery
* DC innovates on 15th Street bike lane
* Weather Slows Morning Rush
* Inner loop lane in Va. closed by water main break; Evening commute snarls possible

Entries By Category
* 14th Street Bridge
* 14th street bridge
* Advisories
* Biking
* Commuting
* Congestion
* Construction
* Driving
* Events
* Getaway
* Inauguration
* Metro
* Public-Private
* Purple Line
* Safety
* Springfield Interchange
* Stadium
* Transportation Politics
* Weather
* Weekend Work
* Wilson Bridge
* highways
* holiday travel
* intercounty connector
* transit
* Full Category Archive

Entries By Date

* Full Weekly Archive

Subscribe

Select ...

RSS Feed
Close
Resources

* Transportation and the Inauguration
* Transportation News
* Traffic Center
* The Commuter Graphic
* Commute Calculator
* Current Gas Prices
* Taxi Fare Calculator
* Dr. Gridlock Columns
* Q&A: Dr. Gridlock
* Q&A: Roads & Rails
* Commuting 101
* Transit Links
* CommuterPage.com

Metrorail

* Riding Metro
* System Map
* Trip Planner
* Alerts

Commuter Rail

* Routes, Ticketing
* MARC (Maryland)
* Virginia Railway Express

Bus Systems

District:
* Metrobus
* Circulator
* Chinatown Buses
Maryland:
* Annapolis Transit
* Calvert County
* Corridor Transportation
* Howard Transit
* Maryland Mass Transit Administration
* Ride On (Montgomery)
* St. Mary's Transit
* VanGO (Charles County)
Virginia:
* ART (Arlington)
* CUE (Fairfax)
* DASH (Alexandria)
* Fairfax Connector
* Fred (Fredericksburg)
* George (Falls Church)
* LINK (Reston)
* Loudon County Transit
* Omniride (Prince William, Manassas)
* TAGS (Springfield)
* TheBus (Pr. George's)
* TYTRAN (Tysons)
* Valley Connector (Shenandoah Valley)

Roads

* Carpooling
* Traffic Center
* Toll Roads
* Current Gas Prices
* Taxi Fare Calculator
* The Commuter Graphic

Air

* Flight Status, Parking
* Dulles International Airport
* Reagan National Airport
* Baltimore/Washington Airport

Biking

* Trails and Routes

DC innovates on 15th Street bike lane
bike Justin Wilson of D.C. makes his way south on new 15th St. lane. (Gerald Martineau/Post)

During my online chat Monday, I got a comment about the new bike lane the District Department of Transportation is installing along 15th Street NW. The lane is designed to allow bikers to travel southbound in a protected area on what otherwise is a one-way street northbound. This is the reader's comment:

15th Street, NW, Washington, D.C.: The 15th street contraflow bike lane is an absolute disaster. Traffic has not slowed. It's still as dangerous for cyclists. Street cleaners cannot get to the curb or they will rip off the reflective covers that indicate the bike lane. Cyclists are going the wrong way. Cars are parked in the lane. 15th street does not feel part of the neighborhood. There are misspelled words like "yield" in the bike lane. Please tell me this is not permanent.

John Lisle, a spokesman for DDOT, saw the comment and went out to take some pictures of the new lane. You can see one of his pictures below.

He says most of the installation work is done, and this may resolve some of the potential issues raised. Lisle suspects there might have been some confusion -- particularly about the parking by the bike lane -- while the installation was underway, but thinks this will no longer be the case.

Also, he said, "The signage, for both cyclists and drivers, is very good and I think the bike lane is going to be very popular."

Some cyclists will indeed go the wrong way in the lane, meaning they will use it to ride northbound, rather than stick to the regular lanes of traffic, which are one-way north. They'll prefer the protection of the bike lane. But even that should not be a major problem, Lisle said.
15th Street 2-John Lisle-ddot.JPG Completed contra lane. (John Lisle/DDOT)

DDOT says it is testing the contra concept on the 14-block stretch of 15th between Massachusetts Avenue and U Street. It's the city's first protected bike lane, buffered from traffic by parked cars.

What's the impact on traffic? It takes away a travel lane and eliminates six parking spots, the latter to increase visibility for bikers. That's not a crippling blow to traffic. Many drivers heading north still will prefer 15th to 16th or 14th. DDOT says there is more road capacity than necessary on 15th, given the number of cars regularly using it. But the narrowing of the roadway for the bike lane may have the side benefit of slowing down traffic on 15th, which has always gone too fast.

DDOT has been working with the neighborhood for several years on proposals to reconfigure the roadway. DC is looking to move away from the car-dominated road network of the mid-20th century into something that is friendlier to walkers and reconnects neighborhoods.

The innovation has been a popular topic online. Here are some of the takes on it:
* David Alpert, Greater Greater Washington
* DCist noted the misspelling.
* WashCycle noted completion of the lane.

Here's a DDOT image showing a cross section of the reconfigured street. The contraflow lane is on the left side.

cross section.jpg

By Robert Thomson | November 12, 2009; 9:00 AM ET
Categories: Biking , Safety | Tags: DDOT, Dr. Gridlock, contraflow bike lane Share This: E-Mail | Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Stumble Previous: Weather Slows Morning Rush
Next: Hiker-biker bridge moving forward in Montgomery
Comments

did the road "feel like part of the neighborhood" before? this odd turn of phrase is being used by a couple anti-commenters at all of the above sites, and it just sounds really weird and practiced, like a creepy talking point.

Posted by: IMGoph | November 12, 2009 9:41 AM | Report abuse

I'm liking the new photo, Dr. Gridlock!

Posted by: WashingtonDame | November 12, 2009 10:19 AM | Report abuse

From Dr. Gridlock: You mean the smiley-face one, WashingtonDame? Yeah, I like that better than the more severe version we've been using for the past three years. I know most of our travelers don't find traffic and transit conditions amusing, so I was a little worried about smiling in the face of so much misery, but Post staff photographer Bill O'Leary convinced me otherwise.

Posted by: Dr_Gridlock | November 12, 2009 11:07 AM | Report abuse

From Dr. Gridlock: IMGoph, I can tell you the theory on the "part of the neighborhood" thing. And it probably is a phrase that would be quite commonly used by urban transportation planners these days.

The idea is that city planners in the middle of the 20th century thought that the car would be king forever, so they redesigned their cities to accommodate cars. That meant putting in highways and broad streets -- often one-way streets -- that would make it easy for commuters to drive in and out of the central city. But one of the side effects was to split up neighborhoods. People no longer felt safe crossing a wide road with fast moving traffic. There's been a movement in recent years to restore roads to neighborhood scale, so people who live in the area will again feel comfortable crossing them to visit neighbors and local shops.

Posted by: Dr_Gridlock | November 12, 2009 11:13 AM | Report abuse

The use of taxpayers dollars to bulid bike lanes on the crowed street of DC is crazy as cat SH##.

Less than 0.5% of bikers use the lane and cannot or should not be biking during inclement weather.

DC needs to solve traffic conjestion not appease a handful of folks that wants to bike during rush hours traffic.

Most biker refuse to follow the laws weave in between lanes and do not obey traffic signs.

New laws should be passed to required bikers who want ot ride in conjested traffic to carry insurance and license tags like the other drivers.

Posted by: blkisin | November 12, 2009 11:57 AM | Report abuse

blkisin:

I pay taxes in DC and bike to work, I don't own a car. Your statistics seem a little concoted and I don't think it's for you to judge when I bike. I think DC needs congestion pricing downtown, so that people who don't live here don't add to our traffic, pollution, and parking problems without paying for their added burden. I think DC needs to appease actual citizens like myself, not commuters who pay taxes somewhere else and just drive in to get their paycheck.

Posted by: monongahela79 | November 12, 2009 12:05 PM | Report abuse

As a biker,I can appreciate the bike lane because since I frequently ride around the city,it provides aspecial lane form to get where I need to be going. Iknow some people may feel that is what the side walk is for but if I am trying to get somewhere, I do not want to be stressed about pedestrians in my way.

Posted by: lols | November 12, 2009 2:15 PM | Report abuse

As a person that uses a bike as means for transportation,I appreciate that bike lane. The bike lane is great forme because I use it when traveling around the city because it separates me from any danger I may be facing when Iam riding in the general automobile traffic flow.

Posted by: lols | November 12, 2009 2:19 PM | Report abuse

My only concern and experience was the parking of the SUV's, Trucks that block your view to make a turn, I almost hit a cyclist, turning on to Corcoran St., honestly didn't see the cyclist until the very last second, and some cyclist think they don't have to stop due to them having their own lane.

Posted by: weaverf | November 12, 2009 3:07 PM | Report abuse

I am a DC resident, DC taxpayer and frequent driver on 15th street. To the person who complained that drivers on 15th street don't live in the District, you are wrong. Check out the license plates as you weave your bike through traffic. The new traffic pattern is a total mess. 15th has gone from a well-flowing street during rush hour to a gridlocked, honking nightmare. People are driving significantly worse now, weaving in and out of traffic and trying to get through the gridlock. Eliminating an effective commuter road to appease a handful of residents who didn't like living on a busy street is a total disservice to the entire city. As for bikers, isn't there a bike lane on 17th street? In any event, why not have the bike lane but restrict parking during rush hour. Then we can all get around DC a little easier.

Posted by: mz1451 | November 12, 2009 4:10 PM | Report abuse

This work has been pretty disastrous to the traffic flow of 15th during rush. What used to be 4 open lanes of traffic is now two. How anyone factually or anecdotally say there has "been no effect" is beyond me. I drive it (car) often and its a clusterf^*k. I say this as an avid cyclist.

DDOT's own traffic study shows the level of service decrease by 30% with this option. Bikers already had their own lane on 15th, there was no need for another on the other side of the road, and the permanent removal of those neighborhood parking spots is pretty significant as the local listerv illustrates.

DDOT shows that 1300 vehicles per hour use that road during rush, and you've now reduced the available roadway by a half. How many bikers do, or were anticipated to use 15th street during rush? 20,50 per hour. Now they have two bike lanes. Hardly a fair or technically smart way to use that road. There are smart ways to incorporate bike friendly policies onto our traffic infrastructure. This wasn't one of those ways.

Posted by: Nosh1 | November 12, 2009 4:22 PM | Report abuse

As a resident of 15th St. NW and a biker, I am disgusted with the new traffic configuration. 15th St. NW residents were NOT proponents of this change.

What right thinking person prefers slow-moving, bumper-to-bumper road rage inducing traffic to free flowing movement of the cars, trucks, and buses using this street? And yes - cars, trucks and buses are necessary for commerce in this city, whether you personally detest them or not.

Reducing traffic lanes on this major commuter route has resulted in increased traffic congestion on the street where we live. There is NO way you can justify additional COUNTERFLOWING bicycle traffic on this street and reducing lanes for vehicle traffic as increasing the safety of the thoroughfare to ANY of its users - bikers, pedestrians, or cars. Who runs DDOT?

Oh - that's right - its run by an entrepreneur with a vested interest in making auto ownership and operation in DC unappealing and difficult. Can anybody spell CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

by 15th St. Chuck on Nov 12, 2009 5:23 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam