Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

To elaborate, what bothered me the most about the VDOT meeting was two things. First, though they supposedly studied "19 different alternatives", with virtually all of them rejected by the advisory group, the impression I got is they're hesitant to study any more alternatives unless "officially requested by the city". Second, pretty much EVERY VDOT representative at the meeting was a consultant and not part of VDOT itself.

by Froggie on Mar 12, 2010 1:22 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam