Report a Comment

JB, the driver who got in the accident was not charged by police, and the neutral arbitrators decided he was wrongly fired. By what basis do you claim his behavior was clear cut and egregious? Do you have some evidence the police and neutral arbitrators didn't see?

The case guy that punched the crime dog while working is harder for me to understand, but then, I haven't seen the evidence brought before the arbitration panel, or the contract metro agreed to with its workers.

At any rate, the union's job is to defend its members. If you really believe the cases were clear cut and egregious, you should direct your anger at the Metro managers who screwed up an easy termination, or the Metro lawyers who screwed up an easy arbitration hearing.

by jcm on Jun 9, 2010 2:29 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam