Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Maybe the VA will not be so onerous. Wait and see the outcome before you pass judgment on it. One thing to realize, once these agreements, use permits, whatever a jurisdiction wants to call it go into affect, it is usually very hard to amend them. It's wise to make sure they study the conditions and get it right the first time.

Now, you claim this site is not in the 16th Street Historic District, but the Examiner article says it's "in an historic district". Which is it, or are they two different districts? If the Examiner is correct and the use is subject to DDOT and Historic Preservation review, have they issued reports? If not, that would be another reason to wait and hash out a VA when you know what all the conditions from the stakeholders are.

by Lou on Jul 19, 2010 2:15 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam