Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Lance: You're wrong about the resolution, because I had no part in writing it. As I said, I missed the initial presentation and therefore didn't participate. I believe my only involvement was to ask a question about the intent of a phrase, which was then changed because it could be interpreted in way other than how its author meant it.

I am amazed you are arguing that an area is residential because the White House is nearby. Calling an area residential is not just about whether at least one person lives there. It's about whether businesses there need to be restrained in their impacts because we believe that residents deserve some protection from those impacts.

The White House is not impacted by what goes on at 16th and K. It's a fortress, I'm sure it has soundproofing, there's a park in between, and if anything the White Houses impacts the area (through motorcades), as opposed to being impacted by it.

by David Alpert on Jul 19, 2010 2:27 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam