Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I haven't ready any comments above, but my own 2 cents... 600' in many cases isn't too bad, but when you're carrying luggage (as at an airport you almost certainly are) then that can be a bit daunting. Also, the trek across a surface parking lot is never particularly pleasant or appealing, making even short distances seem rather longer.

However, I can also appreciate a need for cost savings where it makes sense to do so. That said, is there anything being planned to facilitate pedestrian travel between the station & terminal? I just did a quick skim of your write-up and didn't spot any mention, but I could certainly be missing it.

Moving walkways, ideally enclosed or at least covered, would certainly sway my opinion toward supporting such a realignment, but of course cost-savings considerations should also note long-term costs of any additional maintenance / operations of additional infrastructure geared toward moving people between station & terminal.

by Bossi on Aug 12, 2010 10:08 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam