Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I have a few comments, coming from both Montreal and New York and seeing the cycle tracks in both places. First, I believe the proposed configuration in DC will get a LOT of people to use bikes. It creates a slow biking environment that is protected from car traffic, connects to destinations and other cycle tracks, and provides an obvious return route. That said, the narrow 2-way design will create a slower biking environment. You simply can't ride at a fast speed without hitting other bikes. Thus, in Montreal, the slower, more cautious riders (parents, kids, older folks, etc.) all use the cycle tracks, and those that want to bike fast use other streets. Thus, it appears that the narrower, 2-way design both encourages more people to try cycling, and slows down the cycling environment, benefiting pedestrians and the public perception of cyclists. The DC plan should function similarly, and appears to address some of the safety issues of the Montreal design.

In NYC, they are still having a lot of problems will asshole bikers terrorizing pedestrian while riding in the new cycle tracks. This makes it more difficult to build more cycle tracks.

I am very curious to see the plans for the bus stop. NYC avoids the issue altogether, while both Montreal and Vancouver build a bus stop with a raised crosswalk across the cycle track. The plans here show nothing, which is a non-solution.

by Jacob on Sep 11, 2010 12:14 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

Which rules in the comment policy do you believe the comment violates?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment is name-calling or berates, belittles, or interrogates others.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Comment is getting into an aggressive argument with another.
Comment is trolling.
Comment is off topic.
Commenter is impersonating someone else or switching handles.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.

Enter any other information you think would be helpful to us:

Your name:
Your email:

Sorry, your computer has been blocked due to suspicious activity. If this is an error, we welcome having you comment; please contact us using the email address in the upper right and we will re-enable your comment ability right away. Thanks!
Administrator pagespam