Report a Comment

David, I think this post was extremely sloppy. You ignored several main points of the scenario--particularly, like Michael said, that it is in no way a plan or even a proposal--it's a piece of analytical work to determine what the potential effects of aggressive land use changes, transit, and ONE TYPE of pricing scheme have on travel demand.

read the report. read the findings. the point is to *inform* policy--the report doesn't even sort of advocate implementing this as is--it's far too high level.

And lastly, while this is called an aspiration--it's still a scenario. It was meant to test ideas that the board has been talking about for years. The results are mixed--with different people finding different aspects favorable. As is the case with any study or plan.

by anonymous on Sep 15, 2010 8:04 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam