Report a Comment

@Jamie That is how it should be: the people who have a legitimate complaint should be addressed directly. Those who do not, should not be taken seriously.

But that happens to be exactly how it is now ... I know that at least 2 of the 5 protestants are within easy shouting range of the patio. They can see (and hear) it from the fronts of their homes. Additionally, the neighborhood's civic association, which has an interest in all parts of the neighborhood, and how changes affects its residents was a party to the V.A.

You're saying that the people who have a legitimate complaint should be addressed directly but what you're maybe not connecting the dots to is that the V.A. is their only way of doing this ... Do you really think Hank's would take their concerns into account if Hank's could get licensed without the input from these neighbors? What would incentivize Hank's to do so?

by Lance on Dec 1, 2010 1:05 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam