Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@Ken: I know everyone has their own definition of urbanism, and that's fine, but yours seems to be, "Freeze Georgetown in a way that satisfies the "multi-generational community" that has lived there for decades, and use zoning and other laws to make sure the demographics don't change. Ever." Also, you seem to object to the higher density that student-occupied housing brings to the area.

I really don't see this as a debate on urbainsm at all. Instead, I (and apparently many others) see it as another case of old money looking out for themselves and trying to preserve their own lifestyle and neighborhood. Which is fine - just admit it, and own it. This lame attempt to
stake a claim to the moral high ground on behalf of all the poor, oppressed Georgetown residents doesn't pass the smell test.

by dcd on Jan 18, 2011 1:37 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam