Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Reading through the meeting notes with the citizenry they post on the site, I see no reason why they would require a library that "looks almost nothing like a traditional library." Either we listen to the design charette participants, who in their ideas, came up with some fairly conventional ideas about what a library should be. (suprise!)

While some comments were useful, making it an urban icon, making it URBAN not suburban, while others contradictory. Telling the designers to make a building urban and then requiring parking is just plain silly. The idea of logical balance is needed. Seems to me that the designers couldnt discriminate between what people really wanted and what some nimbys had to say and their own design predispositions.

by Boots on Jun 4, 2008 10:47 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam