Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Kara and others that support the plan are missing the primary point- The University has the burden of proof that its campus plan will not cause objectionable impacts to the community. Balance means nothing. History of how many students lived off campus in the 70s means nothing. The University's desire to raise revenue with additional students means nothing. Lower endowment relative to peers means nothing. The students desire to live off campus means nothing. It is all about the impact period, everything else is just fluff. It is not the community's job to find the solution, but the University. Satellite campus, not enough money- too bad, fix it. More on campus housing, not enough space- too bad, fix it. If it means reducing the number of students then- too bad. Stop jerking the community around with excuses, and use some of your so called intelligence to comply with the Zoning Laws.

by ignores the main issue on Jan 25, 2011 2:16 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam