Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I respectfully and strongly disagree, cminus. Sekou was only briefly considered to be in a leading position. Some would say this time period was anytime before the ethics scandals erupted. Others have suggested the time period was only tightly around the time of his appointment by the DCDSC. Either way, it was clear that--while Sekou himself is a very decent and ethical person--allies burdened him. Furthermore, he failed to use his interim Council seat to take clear, let alone bold, action on the biggest issue on the voting public's minds: ethics. Words and commitments at various forums were never translated into something in the hopper at the JAWB. As a result of all this, I would argue that Sekou's support began to erode long before it ever had the opportunity to actually build.

by Joel on Apr 27, 2011 12:02 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam