Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Just a reminder (from the interview with CaBi in the fall): "The capital cost is about $5 million for 100 stations and the operations for 100 stations is about $2.3 million a year." and "Right now, the city covers all the costs"

It looks then like the 10,000+ annual members and the thousands of one day members are paying something like 1/3 the cost.

City taxes, then, would be paying for the rest. That would be property taxes (wow-my property is slightly more valuable because of the two bikeshare stations nearby) and sales taxes (oh, I just bought something at a store that I used CaBi to get to). That is, in many ways appropriate.

But, of course, it isn't clear that it is right.

It irks me, too, that my CaBi rides are subsidized. But what do you do? We are saddled with the free-for-a-half-hour model inherited from Paris. And there is ire to be had for suggesting an alternative. (As it is, no matter how much users use the system, CaBi is stuck with a fixed revenue base, because revenue is membership not usage.)

by egk on Apr 29, 2011 10:35 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam