Transit
Metro's real reason for eliminating paper transfers
Metro is eliminating paper transfers as of January 4th. According to this presentation before the Customer Service Operations and Safety (CSOS) Committee of the WMATA Board, 25% of bus riders use a bus paper transfer and 2% use a rail paper transfer, compared with 6% of riders who use a SmarTrip card to transfer between buses.
If you only read the official press releases, you'd get the impression that the principal reason Metro is doing this is to save money on printing the paper transfers, since that aspect of it has a dollar figure attached to it:SmarTrip® also makes transferring easier. And it saves Metro - and you, our customer - money on paper and printing. That's why we're discontinuing the paper transfers.However, according to the presentation, that $350,000 savings is dwarfed by two other effects: more payments by riders who don't use SmarTrip, and reduced fraud. Between the two, Metro expects to bring in $5 million more per year in revenue.Eliminating paper transfers will save Metro about $350,000 a year for the cost of paper and printing, plus expenses associated with the repair and maintenance of the old transfer machines in stations. It also is expected to minimize fraud and abuse of paper transfers by individuals who sell or give away their transfers to other riders, and reduce assaults on bus operators by riders who have disputes with operators about transfers.
Some people just won't end up getting a Smartrip card, despite their increasing availability and Metro's efforts to distribute them. Riders without SmarTrips will have to pay full fare when transferring.
As for fraud, paper transfers are frequently resold on the black market, either individually or by the book. More people board Metrobus using a paper transfer than there are cash riders. Meanwhile, there are only one-third as many SmarTrip transfers as SmarTrip cash transactions. Does this imply that two-thirds of paper transfer uses are fraudulent? That seems almost impossibly high.
Other transit systems realized huge revenue gains when they eliminated paper transfers. According to Metro, Boston earned $14 million more in revenue after making the change, and Chicago $17 million. Metro is looking forward to a net revenue gain of $9 million over two years after accounting for the cost of SmarTrip cards, customer communications and other expenses.
Metro should just level with the community and say that some people are defrauding the system to the tune of almost $5 million per year. That buys a lot of SmarTrip cards.
Cross-posted on Infosnack.
Comments
Post a Comment
- WMATA presents options for SmarTrip negative balances
- Teens and young adults aren't mosquitoes
- You know you've arrived when...
- Combine the Circulator and Metro maps for visitors
- For state legislature in Montgomery County
- For Prince George's County offices
- Navy Yard sidewalks get sustainable stormwater systems
Smart Growth
Add jobs, retail, and housing for all income levels in walkable places like
Wisconsin Avenue, Brookland, and Minnesota-
Transit
Provide more alternatives to driving by expanding Metro capacity, building streetcar lines, and speeding up buses. Grow ridership through better maps and schedules from signs to mobile devices. Read posts »
Public Space
Our roadways are our most valuable public places. Design them to accommodate safe walking and bicycling. Locate plazas and public parks to create numerous focal points for human activity. Read posts »
Traffic
Design neighborhoods around grids instead of cul-de-sacs. Avoid building new freeways or widening existing ones which only induces further sprawl. Read posts »
Parking
Drivers create substantial traffic by circling endlessly for scarce parking. Use pricing to manage curb space and dedicate the revenue to providing alternatives to driving. Read posts »
Architecture
Preserve our row house neighborhoods and beautiful architecture that engages pedestrians visually and functionally. Eschew bad modernism that turns its back on the street and the starchitects that peddle it to "make a statement." Read posts »
Education & Safety
Make our urban areas desirable places for people and families of all ages with the highest quality education and safe neighborhoods for all. Read posts »




by Adam on Nov 3, 2008 8:50 am
by Melissa on Nov 3, 2008 9:39 am
by Transport on Nov 3, 2008 9:42 am
by Reid on Nov 3, 2008 9:44 am
WMATA did cite other reasons for the move to Smartrip and no paper transfers (get rid of rail transfer machines, faster boarding, fewer conflicts between riders and operators over "questionable" transfers), but they devoted more slides to the revenue impact than any other effect.
by Michael P on Nov 3, 2008 10:23 am
by Lance on Nov 3, 2008 11:08 am
See here:
by Michael P on Nov 3, 2008 11:15 am
by Dharm on Nov 3, 2008 12:08 pm
nearly everyone gets on with a transfer. it would not surprise me if 2/3 were frauds.
by sean on Nov 3, 2008 12:54 pm
by Distantantennas on Nov 3, 2008 3:14 pm
by Alex B. on Nov 3, 2008 3:25 pm
I doubt WMATA would be able to keep an enforcement program going for long without accusations of (1) racism or (2) being too harsh on poorer people. Not that the poor or minorities would cheat any more than average, just that it would be hard to avoid such accusations.
Would WMATA be able to fine someone $500 for transit fare stealing and make the fine stick?
by Michael P on Nov 3, 2008 4:14 pm
There are ten in a pack some students dont use the pass because not economical, some have parents that drive them to school some times etc. what happens to them is metro going to have 20 in a pack now because i recall lots of students catching more than one bus to get to school.
So this does disadvantage some riders, and since metro wants to get rid of it to save money how about dropping the fare back to $ 1.25
by KK on Nov 3, 2008 4:37 pm
by Dharm on Nov 3, 2008 5:06 pm
and it also effects school students because alot of them use school tokens and if you pay witha school token you get a transfer if thats dicontinued they would have to pay with a token then if need to catch another bus pay with another token that would be 4 tokens preday. If they raise they amount of tokens for 10 to 20 that issue would be solved otherwise the people who are mostly affected would be students and the parents of students that use school tokens since the cost to get to school would go up.
by kk on Nov 3, 2008 5:15 pm
The fact is in the transit industry away from paper transfers (in some cases away from transfers period) and towards higher cash fares. In London, the peak cash fare is almost four times the Oyster prepaid fare. In Chicago, the cash bus fare is $0.50 higher than the prepaid fare and you get no transfers unless you prepay. In Houston they got rid of ALL their passes and fares except for the ones the federal government requires (reduced fares for the elderly and disabled). If you use their smartcard and prepay, you get five rides free after fifty rides and free transfers. If you pay cash, well you pay and pay and pay. Why are any of these cities any different from Washington? You need to justify why a an agency with the lowest fare recovery ratio amongst bus systems of its general size should lower fares.
by Dharm on Nov 3, 2008 5:28 pm
Hell the passes also add to paper waste since there infact also made of paper. Why not just go completly plastic other systems can do it or do it partly like you stated with Oystercard in greater london but we cant even seem to do that.
I didnt say they had to lower really just make it equal period however that is thats there call. Hell i dont care if they make it $ 1.50 why not have all fare regarding the bus the same $1.25, 1.35, 1.50, 2.00 whatever.
There are alot of other ways that they waste besides paper, ink etc. Have all fares the same price would say in confusion to passengers, save on ink for signs that state the different fares if its one set then that means less ink and there are quite a few other ways reprinting bus schedules for no reason other than cosmetic changes, Everytime one thing changes like adding another name to a station you have to change, they had to change a bunch of other crap like bus schedules for buses that serve the station, rail maps etc.
If you include other divisons like the rail the brown and how much that would cost that would add a whole lot of paper waste in terms of maps on trains, in station, the small maps etc.
They can solve one way of paper waste but they dont stop the rest so there will still be paper waste with or without they need to look at all
by kk on Nov 3, 2008 6:11 pm
by Adam on Nov 3, 2008 6:54 pm
by Michael P on Nov 3, 2008 8:22 pm
by Mackenzie on Nov 4, 2008 5:24 pm
by Jeannette on Jan 4, 2009 9:09 pm