Greater Greater Washington. The Washington, DC area is great. But it could be greater.

Development


Fight for your right for a vibrant Wisconsin Avenue

Tonight, the Cleveland Park ANC (3C) will debate the controversial Giant PUD at Idaho and Wisconsin. Both supporters and opponents of the PUD have been working to flood ANC Commissioners with letters. If you live in 3C, please email your Commissioner to ask him or her to support the Giant, and attend tonight's meeting at 7:30 at the Second District Police Station on Idaho Avenue (at Newark St) McLean Gardens Ballroom, 3811 Porter St (near Wisconsin).


Wisconsin Giant today. Photo from the developers.
Residents have been hotly debating this project on the neighborhood email list. Unlike many past debates, numerous residents have written in support of the Giant. For example, one resident wrote,
There are truly hundreds of citizens and residents of our neighborhood who, though quiet, would like nothing more than to see the new Giant store and accompanying project started and completed at the earliest possible time. We are all disgusted with the present state of Wisconsin Avenue in our neighborhood. Most of us no longer walk or shop anywhere near the area and cannot understand why or how the authorities have allowed it to be like this now for over two years. Nor do we believe the continuing professional critics of the project should be allowed still once more to succeed in getting further delays.

No project of this magnitude will or can ever be perfect or acceptable to everyone. The critics are well aware of this, but nonetheless continue with their multipronged efforts, obviously hoping to still further delay if not thwart the project altogether. Please do not let them do so again. Nothing would more demoralize the neighborhood than to see the deplorable state of that area allowed to continue for any longer than it takes for Giant to carry out its current plans.

Another resident tried to put this debate in context:
I have been in the CP neighborhood for some 42 years. During this time, I have witnessed numerous innovations that have generated great heat, some light, and usually an improved community. ...

Common to these innovations over the years were their very newness, the opposition of a small group in the community willing to turn out for meetings, the silence of the great majority in the community not attending meetings, concerns and reservations that usually have not come to fruition, and eventual acceptance resulting in community betterment.

I see the same situation with the proposed expansion of our Giant, now going into the ninth year of discussion. We hear constantly from a small group of dissidents: Cars will be speeding down my street, my basement will suffer structural damage, parking will be insufficient, it will be a destination Giant, even though there are several larger stores within two miles, and other issues you have heard and read on the ListServe.

It is time to move forward. I think the vast majority of our community wants us to move this project with all haste, even though they don't attend the meetings.

Jeff Davis, organizer of the pro-project organization Advocates of Wisconsin Avenue Renewal (AWARE), wrote,
The difference this time is that the vast "silent majority" is no longer silent. A group of neighbors has joined together to stand up to the small group of naysayers and to speak up for the Giant PUD Application.

Others, of course, see the past fights that blocked development as successes. Exhibit A is Cleveland Park's Metro stop, where riders emerge from the escalator in the midst of a "historic" parking lot on an anemic commercial strip. Wrote one pleased resident,

Community activists got a provision in the Comprehensive Plan stating that Cleveland Park at Connecticut should not have the same high level of development as other metro stop neighborhoods. That provision was vital in blocking the high rises [proposed for this area] ... where the Park and Shop stands.
That poster and others wrote about anti-development fights over the Wardman Houses, the Tregaron Estate, McLean Gardens and more. Some of these do represent historic resources worth saving, in whole or in part. But as in many neighborhoods, those who want to preserve the historically valuable often find common cause with those who simply wish to oppose everything. In Cleveland Park, both have grown strong. Another resident reacted with disgust to this sentiment:
I'm sorry folks, but I am really not interested in all these self-congratulatory e mails about Cleveland Park's successes in discouraging higher density developments in your neighborhood. ...

I also recall well the fight you all led against the Giant's last PUD proposal. ... That "victory" was what led to the design with a "blank wall" on Wisconsin. One of the people who had been most vociferous at ANC meetings ... was on television complaining about Giant's plans to do what she had been asking for all along.

Frankly, I am sick of having my neighborhood shopping area being the pathetic, woebegone collection of outdated buildings and empty shops that it is now. I'd even be happy to see more restaurants there. I want the wonderful, friendly staff at my neighborhood market to have a modern facility that will make their work easier and will give the many shoppers who live west and south of Newark & Wisconsin the kind of first-rate grocery store & shopping district that we deserve.

The fireworks will start tonight at 7:30 at the Second District Police Station on Idaho Avenue (at Newark St) McLean Gardens Ballroom, 3811 Porter St (near Wisconsin). The "silent majority" must speak up and let the Commissioners know that a new store and a mixed-use corner is right for the neighborhood.

Comments

David, thanks for posting this but tonight's ANC meeting, according to an email from Trudy Reeves, an ANC Commissioner, "will meet at the McLean Gardens Ballroom - 3811 Porter St at the fountain - parking on the street and in the Giant parking lots on Newark St." The time is still 7:30.

by Ben on Jan 21, 2009 12:17 pm  (link)

I don't want to hijack the discussion thread (though I suspect there's already been plenty discussed about this subject elsewhere). However, I'm curious: are there any pro-development/pro-density ANCs in DC? I get the impression that ANCs tend to be the vehicle for local NIMBYs to preserve the status quo.

by Steve on Jan 21, 2009 12:42 pm  (link)

nine years?!?

Wow. That's a long time. I feel so sorry for the Cleveland Park section. Your neighborhood clearly has the demographics to support a better retail environment. It is just sad that a few who hate everything want to ruin it for everyone. What's the old saying about 5% of the people causing 95% of the problems?

by Cavan on Jan 21, 2009 1:21 pm  (link)

Probably closer to 10. Hopefully the political landscape, and the fact that supporters are becoming organized, will change the face of this, and other projects going forward.

by William on Jan 21, 2009 1:45 pm  (link)

@ Cavan

You're thinking of Pareto's 80/20 ratio.

by MPC on Jan 21, 2009 1:53 pm  (link)

I'll look that one up so I get it right next time I use it.

by Cavan on Jan 21, 2009 1:54 pm  (link)

Steve -- I think it's difficult to paint development with as wide a brush as you do -- asking if there are ANCs with a pro-development, pro-density position.

I think the question is are there deliberative ANCs, who are willing to consider both neighborhood and broader objectives simultaneously, who understand that there are constraints and compromises. As I have said since being pretty active in local issues since 2000 -- I am not against development, but I am definitely against bad development. That doesn't mean that I am anti or pro density. What is good development depends on the context of the site.

That being said, I think that ANC6A is exemplary. I don't agree with them always, but it's fair to say that they are against crappy development.

E.g., I had a difference of opinion with "them" over initial plans for a 6-7 story building at 8th and H to replace the H Street Connection. Initially, they were "against" a building this tall. (The site abuts the urban renewal era Capitol Towers which is probably 8 stories tall).

But the developer has since submitted plans that call for a mixed use project with high quality design on the first three stories that is complementary and compatible with the historic fabric that still remains on H Street and the abutting residential blocks. (I don't totally love what they've proposed, it's a lot like downtown office buildings such as the buildings at 12th and F Streets NW or the National Academy of Sciences building.)

And it appears that ANC6A believes this is a quality submission worth supporting, albeit with some back and forth still to come.

I am not familiar with all the ANCs in the city, mostly I know what's up with the Ward 5 and Ward 6 ANCs, with a smattering of knowledge of Ward 1 and Ward 4 ANCs, and in my experience, the post-2002 ANC6A is the best of the ANCs with which I am familiar.

They have standing committees. Standing committees have community members. (Many ANCs don't have standing committees and don't allow for community members who aren't elected ANC commissioners.)

Plus, they are likely the only ANC that allows non-elected community residents to serve as committee chairs. (Granted, some have criticized this as having people in positions of authority who aren't subject to the power of the electorate, but given the way that ANCs work, only the electorate within an ANC single member district has the ability to "punish" or "reward" and individual commissioner, not officers.)

This gives the ANC additional people-power, committed residents focused on community issues and representation.

Now, if ANC6A didn't have a working knowledge of and commitment to basic urban design principles, this could just as easily be a setup for the same kind of b.s. common to other ANCs (as I have joked before, you can have 279 great commissioners or 279 hacks [when I tell this joke, I actually use the name of a former Mayor], and as someone else once said, many ANC Commissioners don't understand that they are supposed to be fair and committed to open and transparent processes).

Note too that the city doesn't provide an adequate training infrastructure for ANCs and civic associations, something I mean to address at some point... And also, it must be said that from time to time I provide technical assistance to various ANC6A matters if asked by certain people to assist...

by Richard Layman on Jan 21, 2009 2:48 pm  (link)

I live in Cathedral Court. We have dozens of neighbors who have grown very tired of constant delays on the Giant,by the efforts of a small minority of noisy neighbors, and we'll be rounding up some folks to attend the April 23 meeting.

by Michael Agosta on Apr 9, 2009 2:25 pm  (link)

I live in Cathedral Court. We have dozens of neighbors who have grown very tired of constant delays on the Giant,by the efforts of a small minority of noisy neighbors, and we'll be rounding up some folks to attend the April 23 meeting.

by Michael Agosta on Apr 9, 2009 2:26 pm  (link)

Post a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (required, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)

or see below to post

To post your comment, please enter the two words in the box below to prevent spam:

Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it again next time

How can our region be greater?

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States license.