Greater Greater Washington. The Washington, DC area is great. But it could be greater.

Traffic


I'm so proud of you!

I wouldn't have believed it once upon a time, but the comment sections of DC area blogs have started to talk about transportation and urban planning issues in a much more thoughtful and knowledgeable way. Thanks to the skills you've honed and knowledge you've picked up here and on the many other excellent urbanism-related blogs in the area, when something pops up on a blog like DCist that oversimplifies a transportation issue, you quickly set things straight with extremely intelligent comments.

This morning, DCist Editor Sommer Mathis included the Arlington HOT lane lawsuit in her morning roundup. As happens not infrequently in blogs' link summaries (including ours here), snark and pith beat out thoughtful policy analysis, and the four-sentence summary ended up framing the issue in terms of the natural but incorrect reaction many have to freeway traffic: it's crowded, so we need more lanes.
Poor Arlington. Looks like it's come down with a bad case of the NIMBYs! The County filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday in an effort to stall plans for high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes on interstates 95 and 395, citing air pollution concerns. Gotta wonder if that means Arlington is happy with the status quo on Shirley Highway, which is generally a parking lot. The state of Virginia has actually already delayed installing these lanes, however, due to the weakened bond market, so looks like Arlington won't have to worry about trying out variable congestion pricing for a while anyway.
My point isn't to hassle Sommer, but to call out the amazing comments that followed. Right out of the gate RJ pointed out some of the ways HOT lanes are actually a terrible idea. Soon after was this totally-on-message piece from monkeyrotica. A year ago, he was one of DCists funniest and most prolific commenters; he has now added "great at refuting bad freeway projects" to the repertoire:
HOT won't accomplish anything but create more induced demand and generate cash for the private companies setting up the HOT tracking system. You'll have the same problems they're going to have once they finish widening 270: a mountain of debt, more traffic, and drivers will shave a total of 1-2 minutes off their commute times. I've got no love for the People's Republic of Arlington or NIMBYs, but in this case they're right to sue.
Commenter arglebargle added an entertaining twist, too: "I think they should expand 395 until it merges with 66... making a giant 395 + 66 = 461. This will solve all of Virginia's traffic problems for sure! (Until the 300 lanes on the new 461 need to merge into the same few 3-lane bridges going into DC.)" Tom, hryan4740, CSG's Stewart Schwartz, and others rounded out an excellent refutation of the HOT lane folly.

Now if only the Post's comment sections could be one percent as intelligent.

Comments

Well, you have to remember that Washington Post commenters aren't witty bloggers like DCist, but people who write letters to the editor (and probably get rejected).

by J.D. Hammond on Aug 20, 2009 4:25 pm  (link)

NIMBY is a B.S. term here, anyway. NIMBY refers to the attitude "I'm OK with X in general, but I don't want to live near it." Arlington is opposed to freeway expansion in general, not just freeway expansion in Arlington.

by GC on Aug 20, 2009 4:25 pm  (link)

DCist commenters, I mean. Sorry.

by J.D. Hammond on Aug 20, 2009 4:26 pm  (link)

As I pointed out before, there is no folly in the HO/T lanes concept. The folly is in VDOT's application of it here.

by Froggie on Aug 20, 2009 5:10 pm  (link)

monkeyrotica is the most brilliant commenter on any blog ever. the end.

by Ward 1 Guy on Aug 20, 2009 5:25 pm  (link)

i think i can see his ego growing from all the way over here...

by IMGoph on Aug 21, 2009 12:06 am  (link)

Guilty as charged for growing an ginormous ego...IN MY PANTS.

And the Washington Post commenters are Ph.D doctoral candidates compared to what you find on the WTOP comment threads. These people manage to blame everything from crab overharvesting to male pattern baldness on illegal immigrants. I don't WANT to read this stuff, but I just can't look away!

by monkeyrotica on Aug 21, 2009 6:29 am  (link)

I didn't like the way Sommer presented delays to H.O.T. lanes as spilt milk looking for some one to cry over it. I'd like to think we called her to task for missing the point about the damage these lanes cause and the more sensible alternative transportation options that should be giver emphasis. Coming from car ingesting LA she may view the ability to sit in traffic as a god given right, but the greater DC area won't solve traffic problems by putting more cars on the road. I also don't like the idea of toll roads in wealthy communities. A couple of bucks extra to get to work won't hurt the driver; it hurts the communities he drives into.

And oh yes; monkeyrotica knows how to put pen to paper.

by Over the River on Aug 21, 2009 7:38 am  (link)

Post a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (required, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)

or see below to post

To post your comment, please enter the two words in the box below to prevent spam:

Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it again next time

How can our region be greater?

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States license.