Links
Breakfast links: Speak for transit
Comments
Post a Comment
- WMATA presents options for SmarTrip negative balances
- Teens and young adults aren't mosquitoes
- You know you've arrived when...
- Combine the Circulator and Metro maps for visitors
- For state legislature in Montgomery County
- For Prince George's County offices
- Navy Yard sidewalks get sustainable stormwater systems
Smart Growth
Add jobs, retail, and housing for all income levels in walkable places like
Wisconsin Avenue, Brookland, and Minnesota-
Transit
Provide more alternatives to driving by expanding Metro capacity, building streetcar lines, and speeding up buses. Grow ridership through better maps and schedules from signs to mobile devices. Read posts »
Public Space
Our roadways are our most valuable public places. Design them to accommodate safe walking and bicycling. Locate plazas and public parks to create numerous focal points for human activity. Read posts »
Traffic
Design neighborhoods around grids instead of cul-de-sacs. Avoid building new freeways or widening existing ones which only induces further sprawl. Read posts »
Parking
Drivers create substantial traffic by circling endlessly for scarce parking. Use pricing to manage curb space and dedicate the revenue to providing alternatives to driving. Read posts »
Architecture
Preserve our row house neighborhoods and beautiful architecture that engages pedestrians visually and functionally. Eschew bad modernism that turns its back on the street and the starchitects that peddle it to "make a statement." Read posts »
Education & Safety
Make our urban areas desirable places for people and families of all ages with the highest quality education and safe neighborhoods for all. Read posts »




by J.D. Hammond on Oct 26, 2009 9:37 am
It might make more sense to direct the green line to Westphalia, rather than zigzagging light rail.
by цarьchitect on Oct 26, 2009 10:12 am
by rdhd on Oct 26, 2009 10:17 am
by Froggie on Oct 26, 2009 10:54 am
by Matt R on Oct 26, 2009 12:16 pm
A large number of residents around the EM Metro own not one car, but multiple cars.
What is ironic is than a majority of these residents consider themselves "progressive" or "democrats" along the party line issues- yet they all buyinto the standard anti-city anti-density hysteria akin to the thinking of the 1950's.
We DO NOT NEED a huge garage at Hines;
WE DO NOT NEED more surface parking in the neighborhood;
WE DO NEED more density
WE DO NEED dedicated bikeways
WE DO NEED improved and easier pedestrian access to Metro- w/o planting hedges or obstructions to make it harder to cross PaAve or to take shortcuts
WE DO NEED new streetcars around Capitol Hill/Nay Yard - which is AGAINST the wishes of the CHRS/ NIMBY elitists who all want a suburbia in the city for their cars.
by w on Oct 26, 2009 12:42 pm
http://www.pgplanning.org/Projects/Ongoing_Plans_and_Projects/Transportation/Master_Plan_of_Transportation.htm
Firstly, the PL is intended more as a feeder into Metro; not necessarily a line you'd want to ride past many stops. Hence, a connection into the Metro Lines beyond New Carrollton is a must -- especially if destined for National Harbor.
The plan does mention looking into Metro links at Branch Ave or Suitland. Suitland could be a bit of a haul, with numerous potential stops before the end destination of National Harbor. Branch Ave would likely entail running directly along the Beltway. The latter isn't too shabby if you want to go straight to NH, but you miss some potential ridership in the higher-density areas to the north of the Beltway.
I've been exploring three different alignments: one is essentially PG Co's plan of a circumferential Purple Line station. Another is a line out of Southern Ave which picks up the Forest Heights area. Another is out of King St, which also stops by P&R's at Eisenhower Ave before crossing Woodrow Wilson & continuing along my circumferential or turning toward NH.
One thing to possibly keep in mind (though I haven't explored cost or ridership yet) is a potential extension beyond NH down toward Indian Head... I foresee any master planned transit lines terminating in NH without a way out, in case there was ever a desire for one.
I'm still working on working out some technical issues with all three as well as the potential interlocking between all three alignments... I'll try and upload those next onto my website.
by Bossi on Oct 26, 2009 2:07 pm
by sara on Oct 26, 2009 10:29 pm
by David Alpert on Oct 26, 2009 11:29 pm
http://philatransport.blogspot.com/2009/10/preview-of-southern-pg-co.html
Oops, turns out I had also been eying up Suitland for a line out to NH... must've gotten my stations mixed up. I spotted somewhere in their study mention of continuing south toward Charles County, but I can't recall seeing anything about continuing into Virginia.
If there was still intention of heading into Virginia, I'd still be curious to see how they intend to hit NH and get across the Woodrow Wilson Bridge... that's been keeping me scratching my head for a couple weeks now.
by Bossi on Oct 27, 2009 12:20 am