Links
Breakfast links I: Peds, bikes, trees and parks
Have a tip for the links? Submit it here.
Comments
Post a Comment
- WMATA presents options for SmarTrip negative balances
- Teens and young adults aren't mosquitoes
- You know you've arrived when...
- Combine the Circulator and Metro maps for visitors
- For state legislature in Montgomery County
- For Prince George's County offices
- Navy Yard sidewalks get sustainable stormwater systems
Smart Growth
Add jobs, retail, and housing for all income levels in walkable places like
Wisconsin Avenue, Brookland, and Minnesota-
Transit
Provide more alternatives to driving by expanding Metro capacity, building streetcar lines, and speeding up buses. Grow ridership through better maps and schedules from signs to mobile devices. Read posts »
Public Space
Our roadways are our most valuable public places. Design them to accommodate safe walking and bicycling. Locate plazas and public parks to create numerous focal points for human activity. Read posts »
Traffic
Design neighborhoods around grids instead of cul-de-sacs. Avoid building new freeways or widening existing ones which only induces further sprawl. Read posts »
Parking
Drivers create substantial traffic by circling endlessly for scarce parking. Use pricing to manage curb space and dedicate the revenue to providing alternatives to driving. Read posts »
Architecture
Preserve our row house neighborhoods and beautiful architecture that engages pedestrians visually and functionally. Eschew bad modernism that turns its back on the street and the starchitects that peddle it to "make a statement." Read posts »
Education & Safety
Make our urban areas desirable places for people and families of all ages with the highest quality education and safe neighborhoods for all. Read posts »




Another blog maintenance question: I keep having to do the captcha every time I open a new browser. Can that be fixed?
by Reid on Nov 10, 2009 9:28 am
by David Alpert on Nov 10, 2009 9:30 am
by David Alpert on Nov 10, 2009 9:33 am
That said, the police escort shouldn't be holding up traffic at lights to let the riders cross. Of course, if they didn't, the ride would take longer, rack up more man-hours of labor from the police, and WTOP would be writing about that instead.
by Brian S on Nov 10, 2009 9:38 am
by Ugh on Nov 10, 2009 10:01 am
In the scenes with a whole bunch of cyclists, one could even say that they define the "normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing" which would mean they're not restricted to riding as close as practicable to the curb. Although they're still not allowed to ride more than two abreast.
by thm on Nov 10, 2009 10:07 am
http://www.thewashcycle.com/2008/10/biking-on-the-1.html
by Local on Nov 10, 2009 10:24 am
by chARlie on Nov 10, 2009 10:27 am
by Canaan on Nov 10, 2009 10:36 am
1) I've noted quite a few cars parked in the "visibility space" along 15th street. Very disappointing. Those spaces are just marked as boxes like the rest of the parking. There needs to be diagonal stripes in them to really drive home that it is not a parking space.
2) All those leaves in the bikeway! I nearly lost it twice last night on my way down 15th to Whole Foods. How are they going to keep that lane leaf-free?
3) The ped-fatalities study is BS if it can't list deaths per capita or per walk trip. Raw numbers are worthless.
4) Fenty is an arrogant, imperious little child. He needs to spend more time working with the city council and less time training for bike races. Is he our mayor or our mascot?
by michael on Nov 10, 2009 10:42 am
by Fritz on Nov 10, 2009 11:04 am
As for 15th Street: leaves, acorns, parked cars, granite curbs. No thanks.
by crin on Nov 10, 2009 11:41 am
by Froggie on Nov 10, 2009 11:51 am
2) I agree, Michael, on the leaves. It's perfect for homeowners, though, since no parked cars to ruin the piles!
by ah on Nov 10, 2009 12:03 pm
Cut down all the trees?
by Ugh on Nov 10, 2009 1:27 pm
Do give the study an actual read if you have some time; I think you'll find your concerns are both addressed. You can actually just read the full summary online and view the tables without having to download and read the whole thing.
To answer your question @chARlie, NYC is the deadliest city based on the sheer numbers. Of all the traffic fatalities there, pedestrians make up more than 30%, which is staggeringly high. (And we have metros ranked that way in one table to show top 10 share). For the pedestrian danger index, which we calculated to compare metro to metro, NYC is much safer because of the huge percentage of people walking to work, the high population, and the relatively low frequency of pedestrian deaths. It's certainly much safer to walk all the time in Manhattan that is to walk everyday on the outskirts of Orlando. So we show it both ways so the NYC folks don't think "oh, it's no big deal." Because more than 600 peds died in the last two years there. And that IS a huge deal, though relatively safer than Orlando.
@Michael, the study does list deaths per capita, using our index measure (PDI) to show the relative danger based on percentage of people walking to work.
Unfortunately, there's no other reliable dataset measuring trips on foot other than the percentage who walk to work. Even the regular American Community Survey data has a huge margin of error and would make comparisons impossible.
Check out the methodology if you are more interested in the details. http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/methodology/
Hit me up if you have more questions.
by Steve Davis on Nov 10, 2009 1:40 pm
And I love 15th Street, or i used to.
by Jazzy on Nov 10, 2009 8:12 pm