Transit
Metro will delay SmartBenefits changes by one year
Metro will postpone SmartBenefits changes for one year, iMetro reports.
General Manager John Catoe announced the decision last night at the Prince George's budget forum, which iMetro also attended. He reports that Catoe said Metro reached the decision on Tuesday. The "three purse" system will not go into effect January 1 after all, and the old system will stay in effect throughout 2010. Metro can then spend the extra year finding a better solution to the IRS issues.This is good news. Unfortunately, it might be too late for some, as many employees had to make their January elections already, and some companies canceled their SmartBenefits program entirely. Hopefully Metro plans to put out a press release about this today, and proactively communicate this to employers.
Update: According to another attendee at that meeting, Catoe also said that Metro got permission from the IRS to keep unused SmartBenefits in the employee's "purse" instead of refunding it to employers. The IRS is requiring the separate purses, but not the "use it or lose it" provision, bearing out what some commenters said. The IRS further gave Metro permission to delay implementation for one year.
As we've discussed before, the delay might alleviate the immediate SmartBenefits problem, but while Metro was working on this system which they can't even launch, other changes that could have opened up valuable options for closing next year's budget gap got delayed without notice. I hope Catoe will address this issue and explain how they will involve the public to a larger extent in the design of the SmartBenefits system for next year and other SmarTrip features.
Comments
Post a Comment
- WMATA presents options for SmarTrip negative balances
- Teens and young adults aren't mosquitoes
- You know you've arrived when...
- Combine the Circulator and Metro maps for visitors
- For state legislature in Montgomery County
- For Prince George's County offices
- Navy Yard sidewalks get sustainable stormwater systems
Smart Growth
Add jobs, retail, and housing for all income levels in walkable places like
Wisconsin Avenue, Brookland, and Minnesota-
Transit
Provide more alternatives to driving by expanding Metro capacity, building streetcar lines, and speeding up buses. Grow ridership through better maps and schedules from signs to mobile devices. Read posts »
Public Space
Our roadways are our most valuable public places. Design them to accommodate safe walking and bicycling. Locate plazas and public parks to create numerous focal points for human activity. Read posts »
Traffic
Design neighborhoods around grids instead of cul-de-sacs. Avoid building new freeways or widening existing ones which only induces further sprawl. Read posts »
Parking
Drivers create substantial traffic by circling endlessly for scarce parking. Use pricing to manage curb space and dedicate the revenue to providing alternatives to driving. Read posts »
Architecture
Preserve our row house neighborhoods and beautiful architecture that engages pedestrians visually and functionally. Eschew bad modernism that turns its back on the street and the starchitects that peddle it to "make a statement." Read posts »
Education & Safety
Make our urban areas desirable places for people and families of all ages with the highest quality education and safe neighborhoods for all. Read posts »




Of course, Metro could launch all the upgrades at once or use this grace period to get someone to write several lines of code to do it. Heck, some rider could volunteer their services to get the upgrades going.
by Jason on Nov 19, 2009 10:20 am
by ah on Nov 19, 2009 10:34 am
by charlie on Nov 19, 2009 11:23 am
What ever happened to the claim that the IRS requires this, now, no questions asked?
by Tim on Nov 19, 2009 11:39 am
by James M on Nov 19, 2009 12:03 pm
by Jasper on Nov 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Now if they'd stop punishing bus riders by charging additional fee to transfer to and from the subway.
by terkel on Nov 19, 2009 1:48 pm
Of course, maybe James M and I work at the same company.
by scarpy on Nov 19, 2009 2:14 pm
by Interested on Nov 20, 2009 8:04 am
@terkel: What do you mean by "punishing bus riders"? Paper transfers have been eliminated, but SmarTrip users get a discount transferring both ways.
by Matthias on Nov 20, 2009 3:03 pm
And there was a hidden fare hike with the transfers; Metro did not mention anywhere of the rail to bus fare going from $.35 to half of the bus fare they just mentioned the bus to rail transfer and hid the other details.
It is also a punishment say if someone has a pass; one previously could use a pass on the train and get a transfer in the station and pay 35 cent for bus now the would either have to use rail pass & pay full fare on bus or buy two passes one for rail and another for the bus.
by KK on Nov 23, 2009 5:10 pm
by interested on Nov 24, 2009 9:13 am