Bicycling
Just put on a coat, already: Cyclists in a strange land
Imagine visiting a city where the populace steadfastly refused to wear sweaters or coats despite a cold climate.
You might tell your friends incredulous stories about how much people complain about being cold while ignoring an obvious solution. You might take pictures of the enormous three-story space heaters the city placed along its waterfront to let people enjoy the outdoors, and marvel at the ugliness and environmental waste of the practice. Why would the residents of this city endure such painful conditions at such cost to their city and their planet while ignoring such a simple alternative?This sounds absurd, but scarcely more absurd than the way bicyclists talk about American cities. At Cities, Bicycles, and the Future of Getting Around, a panel discussion last week sponsored by the Brookings Institution, Congressman Earl Blumenauer posed what he called the "universalist bicycle mantra": "How many people, right at this moment, are stuck in traffic on their way to ride a stationary bicycle in a health club?"
Why, indeed, would people endure stifling traffic just to hop on another form of transportation that goes nowhere? How is this not similar to walking around outside without a coat while complaining of the chill? What are people thinking? Children can't get to school on their own, while childhood obesity skyrockets. Yet the evident solution to bicyclists, as simple as putting on the sweater, is simply to ride to school. Yet few do.
Musician David Byrne, author of The Bicycle Diaries, illustrated the absurdity every bicyclist sees in our cities through a slide show. He showed pictures of downtown Austin, Texas and Nashville, Tennessee, where giant highway overpasses soared above desolate landscapes below. He showed a streetscape from Houston, Texas, at 11:00 am, with only a single person visible across several blocks. "There was a group of people around the corner," he said. "They were the smokers." Some scenes could have depicted one of many American cities. "I'm not sure where this is," he said, showing a picture of large parking lots separating the occasional tall building. "Maybe Indianapolis." There's no life visible, "unless you consider the car a form of life."
Nevertheless, the average resident of these cities sees little unusual in these scenes. When driving, we see the broad brush of the buildings and the other cars; we tend not to notice a lack of pedestrians, especially when they are rare. When we travel on a bicycle, however, a city devoid of life seems utterly bizarre, and the populace's blithe acceptance of this status quo even stranger.
Yet numerous early- to mid-twentieth century thinkers actively promoted this vision as an ideal. Byrne showed slides from Hugh Ferriss's visions from the 1920s of giant skyscrapers amid lifeless voids, Frank Lloyd Wright's Broadacre City of huge skyscrapers amid lifeless voids, Buckminster Fuller's plan for Harlem of huge skyscrapers amid lifeless voids, and of course, the most well-known of all, Le Corbusier's Ville Radieuse of... you guessed it. Corbusier's plan was considered "enlightened," Byrne noted, "because it had little green patches in the middle."Why can't we just put on the coats? Why can't people cycle in the numbers common in many European cities? Blumenauer and Byrne know why: bicycle infrastructure. We don't have enough of it, at least outside Blumenauer's hometown of Portland, Oregon. Its residents drive 30% less than in Houston, the Congressman said. They spend $2,500 less per year on transportation than the national average, and keep that money in the local economy instead of sending it overseas in oil payments. According to Blumenauer, Portland's bicycle share has increased 400% for less than the cost of one mile of freeway.
New York City Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan revealed one of the most vexing absurdities of all: federal rules that make it extremely difficult if not impossible to build good bicycle infrastructure. For a city to build a bicycle lane requires a detailed air quality conformity analysis and a long checklist of approvals, she explained, and requires the involvement of the state DOT. "There are no national street designs that accommodate best practices" in bicycle lane design, she added.
DC's new protected, contraflow bike lane on 15th Street, NW is in no manual, added Sadik-Khan. Nor are bike boulevard markings, lanes painted with a color, or even bicycle signals. Wherever cities have built such projects, they're in spite of accepted industry standards. "My favorite 5-letter word is PILOT," she said; most of New York's greatest successes in bicycle infrastructure have been officially pilot programs, like the protected lane through Midtown Manhattan which increased bicycling by 46% in that area.
In Sadik-Khan's experience, getting approval to spend federal money on a project has typically been the most difficult part of the project, more even than the oft-vehement opposition from neighbors. Blumenauer, too, feels that opposition is not the major obstacle to progress, noting the over 180 members of the Congressional Bicycle Caucus. What are the obstacles, asked moderator Bruce Katz, Brookings Vice President and director of the Metropolitan Policy Program? Some people are "nervous about change," Blumenauer noted, but worse is the "dysfunctionality of the system."
Led by Sadik-Khan, the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) launched Cities for Cycling, an effort to create a new manual for street design that includes good bicycle infrastructure. They hope to make bicycle lanes, protected lanes, bike boulevards, bike signals and more official parts of a 21st-century version of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the bible of traffic engineers that currently enforces design around cars instead of people.
Blumenauer has another prescription: Political organizing. He called on those who support bicycle infrastructure to defend officials like DDOT head Gabe Klein as he tries to build lanes like that on 15th Street or one on Pennsylvania Avenue near the Capitol that Blumenauer has been pushing for. If just five people email a council member about a bicycle lane, Klein added from the front of the audience, that can make an impact. (And now, we know that's true; your emails on Riggs and South Dakota triggered a change.)
If a small group can make a difference, the next questioner hoped to: He pointed out that Brookings itself has no bicycle parking at its Massachusetts Avenue headquarters, and a sign on the door prohibits bicycles inside. A law in New York just took effect requiring office buildings with cargo elevators to accommodate bicycles if the companies leasing space want to let employees bring bicycles into the office; Sadik-Khan noted that safe, indoor bicycle parking is the leading obstacle for people to bike to work. For his part, Katz promised to look into the issue. Local cyclists will be keeping an eye on their progress.
Cross-posted at Next American City.
Comments
Post a Comment
- WMATA presents options for SmarTrip negative balances
- Teens and young adults aren't mosquitoes
- You know you've arrived when...
- Combine the Circulator and Metro maps for visitors
- For state legislature in Montgomery County
- For Prince George's County offices
- Navy Yard sidewalks get sustainable stormwater systems
Smart Growth
Add jobs, retail, and housing for all income levels in walkable places like
Wisconsin Avenue, Brookland, and Minnesota-
Transit
Provide more alternatives to driving by expanding Metro capacity, building streetcar lines, and speeding up buses. Grow ridership through better maps and schedules from signs to mobile devices. Read posts »
Public Space
Our roadways are our most valuable public places. Design them to accommodate safe walking and bicycling. Locate plazas and public parks to create numerous focal points for human activity. Read posts »
Traffic
Design neighborhoods around grids instead of cul-de-sacs. Avoid building new freeways or widening existing ones which only induces further sprawl. Read posts »
Parking
Drivers create substantial traffic by circling endlessly for scarce parking. Use pricing to manage curb space and dedicate the revenue to providing alternatives to driving. Read posts »
Architecture
Preserve our row house neighborhoods and beautiful architecture that engages pedestrians visually and functionally. Eschew bad modernism that turns its back on the street and the starchitects that peddle it to "make a statement." Read posts »
Education & Safety
Make our urban areas desirable places for people and families of all ages with the highest quality education and safe neighborhoods for all. Read posts »





by CJ on Dec 15, 2009 3:40 pm
by NikolasM on Dec 15, 2009 4:08 pm
by longley on Dec 15, 2009 4:23 pm
by Alex B. on Dec 15, 2009 4:29 pm
Is the 'sykscaper amid lifeless void' the model for the plan at pg plaza posted earlier?
by Bianchi on Dec 15, 2009 4:31 pm
by David Alpert on Dec 15, 2009 5:01 pm
I wholeheartedly agree that it is ridiculous to design our cities so that people can't get exercise. I've puzzled over the "driving to go exercise" phenomenon for a long time. And when I was growing up in Pennsylvania, I couldn't articulate what I didn't like about our area, but I know now that it was the lifeless voids and high-speed roadways that made it unpleasant. As longley points out, we can't expect people to bicycle (or walk) by choice when so many roads are hostile to non-motorists.
The urban environment looks different from various perspectives. A skyline that looks impressive from a distance may give way to a hostile jungle of concrete speedways and lifeless voids once you're in its midst. A road that seems quite nice to drive on may seem barren and dangerous when you're on foot.
We need officials who have first-hand experience as pedestrians and cyclists. That makes a world of difference in the way infrastructure is planned.
by Matthias on Dec 15, 2009 6:29 pm
As a side note, walking will only get you so far. To REALLY drop the weight, you need to do a lot more robust aerobic activity...jogging, biking, etc etc. And the gym helps in this regard because there are other machines (rowing machine and ellipticals) that you can use for cross-training.
by Froggie on Dec 16, 2009 6:56 am
I think it has something to do with the fact that DC is borderline a southern city, and so people don't feel that they should HAVE to dress warmly....well, take a clue from reality people, and you will be much more comfortable (and healthy) spending time outside
by Ariela on Dec 16, 2009 7:49 am
After living in the upper midwest for a while, my tolerance to cold weather has increased, maybe a lot of it is psychological. In some places, people start to where shorts when it's 55 degrees out and I'm fine with a hoody at 40 or so.
by Vik on Dec 16, 2009 9:06 am
Having grown up in the upper Midwest, it's definitely psychological. Since living here, I've found myself getting 'soft' when it comes to cold weather when I visit the family. But compared to most out here, it's nothing.
I think the best example I have of that was going to an ultimate frisbee tournament in Florida one January. The teams from the Midwest were running around shirtless, basking in the sun, enjoying the relatively warm weather. The local Florida kids had on pants, long underwear, hoodies, etc.
There's also probably some self-selection bias at work, too.
by Alex B. on Dec 16, 2009 9:29 am
Le Corbusier was to architecture what Pol Pot was to social reform.
And, I've lived in American cities and been to the killing fields.
by EZ on Dec 16, 2009 9:48 am
by NikolasM on Dec 16, 2009 11:08 am
by Froggie on Dec 16, 2009 11:19 am
by w on Dec 16, 2009 12:41 pm
by Stanton Park on Dec 16, 2009 2:26 pm
you are one of the few who seem to "get it".
Absolutely- these are the ideal bike lanes- protected from car traffic and being "doored".
Unfortunately the city seems to be reluctant to install these kinds of bike ways - in my opinion it is because they are too timid and fear upsetting certain Northern Virginian congressmen who have the DC budget veto in their pockets.
This is very sad.
Pennsylvania Avenue should have a auto- protected bike ways it's entire length on both sides of the street.
by w on Dec 16, 2009 2:38 pm
by Bianchi on Dec 16, 2009 2:52 pm
by Jason on Dec 16, 2009 3:07 pm
by w on Dec 16, 2009 4:03 pm
thanks w.
by Bianchi on Dec 16, 2009 4:33 pm
I get to close my eyes, listen to music, relax and pedal away. No need to have my hands on the handlebars or worry about turning.
by J on Dec 16, 2009 5:48 pm
Yes, put on that "sweater" and go drive your bicycle in traffic. Provided you integrate with vehicle traffic and follow the basic principles of traffic operation, no harm will befall you. Moreover, you are much more likely to be injured or killed on bikeway. If you feel uncomfortable bicycling in traffic, take a traffic cycling class, preferably one that includes on-road instruction.
by Allen Muchnick on Dec 20, 2009 4:01 pm