Greater Greater Washington

Transit


Montgomery councilmembers: Get moving on bus priority

Four members of the Montgomery County Council asked county officials to stop dragging their feet on bus priority, and implement or at least evaluate some fixes as soon as possible.


Photo by icantcu on Flickr.

In a recent letter, they praise the Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)'s work on Ride On, but criticize its unwillingness to pursue bus priority in the short term.

They ask MCDOT to work with state officials and WMATA to find high priority intersections ripe for signal priority or queue jumper lanes that would help buses avoid delays in traffic.

WMATA has been promoting ideas around bus priority for a number of years now. Quite simply, buses spend a fair amount of time in traffic, and that time costs a lot of money. Some of the growth in operating costs comes from more time in traffic. If buses can move more efficiently, it saves on costs and also improves the bus ride for everyone.

Traditional traffic engineering measures intersections and roads based on numbers of vehicles. If changing a signal timing would let more vehicles traverse the intersection, classic traffic engineering says make the change. But we really should be counting people. If one bus has 50 people and a change would help it move faster than 20 cars, giving the bus priority is the right move.

Montgomery County's DOT, notoriously one of the least progressive in the region, has been resistant to this thinking. When activists suggested a few intersections for signal timing, signal priority, or queue jumper lanes, MCDOT pooh-poohed them all but didn't suggest any alternatives of their own.

At a recent county council hearing on transit, MCDOT officials said that any of these fixes would "have to wait" until the county implements a comprehensive Bus Rapid Transit system, like the one being pushed by Councilmember Marc Elrich.

The council disagrees. In a letter to MCDOT and WMATA officials, councilmembers Hans Riemer and Nancy Floreen (at-large), council president Valerie Ervin (district 5, Silver Spring/Takoma Park), and Transportation, Energy, Infrastructure & Environment committee chair Roger Berliner (district 1, Bethesda/Potomac/Chevy Chase) asked MCDOT in effect to get off its butt and start doing something.

They ask MCDOT, Maryland State Highway Administration, and WMATA to generate a list of the highest priority intersections for bus priority fixes, to evaluate the possibility of changes, release that information publicly in a way that residents can review, and to generate a policy to guide such changes.

Kudos to the council for stepping up on this issue. Montgomery County is often one of the most progressive counties on many policies, but its transportation officials need some prodding to pursue solutions beyond just focusing on moving cars. They should take this letter to heart and get their staff, and the buses, moving.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

. . . The link to MCDOT's supposed "poo-poohing" doesn't seem to go to its intended place.

by Joey on Apr 22, 2011 2:10 pm • linkreport

Oops, typo in the article ID. Fixed.

by David Alpert on Apr 22, 2011 2:15 pm • linkreport

Joey - I don't know if this is the link David intended, but you can find some pooh-poohing here.

by Ben Ross on Apr 22, 2011 2:15 pm • linkreport

Here's some non-specific pooh-poohing by MC DOT (from the link provided by Ben Ross):
As stewards of the County's transportation system, we have a responsibility to serve all users, not only transit patrons, but also for motorists who depend on personalized transportation and convenience, pedestrians and cyclists, as well as the freight industry who rely on the transportation system to deliver their goods and services. Our charge is to provide a balanced, safe, effective and efficient transportation system that satisfies the needs of all users. The goals and objectives of each mode often compete or are in conflict with each other, and it is for that very reason that we attempt to provide a balanced set of policies and operational strategies to equitably serve all of our customers. I, and this Department, would not be faithfully serving our residents by discounting the transportation needs of one mode at the expense of another.
I.e., move vehicles, not people.

by Miriam on Apr 22, 2011 2:33 pm • linkreport

Rereading that quote, I find notable the contrast that is drawn between "motorists who depend on personalized transportation and convenience" on one hand and pedestrians and cyclists on the other. In what way is the transportation of motorists any more personalized than the transportation of pedestrians and cyclists? In what way is it more convenient (as opposed to faster)? It seems to me that pedestrian transportation is intrinsically more convenient, if slower, because you don't need to worry about parking or running out of gas. To the degree walking is less convenient in Montgomery County, it's because of policies that prioritize automobiles over pedestrians and make pedestrians wait longer than cars at intersections, fail to provide safe sidewalks, etc.

by Ben Ross on Apr 22, 2011 2:42 pm • linkreport

@Ben Ross

Because for decades "convenient" as defined by the people handing out money has come to be constricted to "as fast as possible" rather than the actual definition of the word.

You are right, walking, biking, transit, etc. are often as or more "convenient" than car travel but are slower.

by MLD on Apr 22, 2011 2:52 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or