Greater Greater Washington

Transit


Sarles responds on wheelchair access

WMATA CEO Richard Sarles sent along the following response to Deena Larsen, whose letter to the editor about navigating Metro in a wheelchair was the subject of an article by Miriam Schoenbaum last week. Ms. Larsen also sent us her reply, included below Mr. Sarles' letter.

Dear Ms. Larsen,

I read your Washington Post Letter to the Editor and Greater Greater Washington post, and want to let you know that we are working to try to improve to better meet the needs of all our customers.


Photo by Daquella manera on Flickr.

As part of our capital program to rebuild system safety and reliability, we are investing more than $100 million to rehabilitate or replace 22 elevators and 103 escalators on the Red, Blue and Orange Lines. After decades of inadequate maintenance and underfunding, Metro has a commitment from the jurisdictions in the region and the federal government to support our efforts to restore the system's state of good repair. While these improvements take time, and cause some inconvenience for customers, the benefits will be better reliability of elevators, escalators, and train service.

Meanwhile, during the Cherry Blossom festival in particular, Metro had technicians available to immediately assist with escalator and elevator issues at the Smithsonian, L'Enfant Plaza, Waterfront, Arlington Cemetery, Capitol South and Metro Center Metrorail stations. I have shared your concerns with Rail Operations management to learn exactly what transpired at Union Station and to determine how we can improve going forwardincluding making elevator wayfinding signage more visible.

Metro is considered one of the most accessible systems in the country, and every Metro station has an elevatorthere are no stations that require the use of steps prior to accessing an elevator. We have posted the locations of our elevators with the accessibility symbol on our Station Name signs about every 20 feet on platform walls and pylons. Also, for your future use, we have posted to the outside of every elevator a sign that provides the 24 hour elevator outage number, 202-962-1212 and 202-962-1825, which is the number to call for a shuttle if the elevator is out of service.

While our elevator reliability has been fairly goodgenerally over 95% of elevators are available each monthI also want to make sure you are aware of the tools we have when planning any future trips with us, including information regarding elevator outages. If you call 202-962-1100, we have people who are available to assist visitors with disabilities in advance of your trip. Also, you will soon see improvements on our website with better real-time information about elevators that are out of service for maintenance or repair.

I realize this information doesn't change the experience you had. But know that we are working to improve, and that our executives do travel through the system periodically with members of our Accessibility Advisory Committee so that we can see the system through the eyes of others.

Sincerely,

Richard R. Sarles
General Manager
and Chief Executive Officer


Dear Mr. Sarles,

I do appreciate your attention to accessibility issues. I would like to point out a few things in response to your letter and suggest some easy fixes to help disabled tourists.

1) While each station may have at least one accessible entrance, there are many station entrances that do require steps. Once you navigate these steps, you will find that the turnstiles do not accommodate wheelchairs (or strollers or ...). Then you have to undo all of that and try another entrancewhich may have steps lurking half way down the corridor. ALL of these non-accessible entrances should have signs saying "This is NOT the accessible entrance. The accessible entrance is (on the west side, one block up... etc.) Please also inform police staff, maintenance staff, and others about these entrances--a nice brochure/map would be lovely. I was directed down two non-accessible entrances by police men and by metro staff at the Union Station.

2) While you may well have staff stationed for breakdowns, there was no signage whatsoever on the Smithsonian exit elevator (from the blue line/metro station side). There was only a yellow gate. I spent 5 minutes just figuring out that it was broken and not some fancy way of doing the pass through the turnstile. This station in particular has its elevator far far away from staffin a dark corner on the far side of the track. Please instruct ALL metro staff that if there is an outage (even to clean up for a moment) to put up a sign:

"This is out of order. The nearest elevator is at __ station. Please call 202-962-1212 and 202-962-1825 for assistance." You could print up a stack of these things and keep them in the stationmaster's office.

This sign was NOT available at the Smithsonian elevator. To be fair, that was the only place that I searched in desperation for a number. And it may be on the elevator itself--but I could not get through the turnstile to get to the elevator. So, please, recheck to make sure that these signs are at:

  • Each turnstile/entrance to each elevator
  • Each elevator
  • Each restroom.

3) I may have been extremely unlucky, but there were no technicians available at the Smithsonian entrance between 4:35 and 5:20 pm on Monday April 4th. I also don't think the technicians were available earlier, because when the policeman and metro staff finally rescued me and got me and my wheelchair up the escalator, they spoke about having to do the same thing about 2 hours earlier. So, please check this availability. Again, I understand breakdowns. But not having a SIGN about the breakdown and an explanation of where to go is absolutely inexcusable!

4) "We have posted the locations of our elevators with the accessibility symbol on our Station Name signs about every 20 feet on platform walls and pylons." I was looking. I did not see one of these. However, I am in a wheelchair and therefore I am 3 feet tall. Could you make them larger? or eye level with a wheelchair? Or provide a printable brochure? Or have brochures available to give out to tourists? (If this is a cost issue, I am sure we can do some fundraising!) I will be in DC again May 13th and I will be happy to retrace my steps with someone.

5) I did go to your websiteand my impression was that if I were a DC resident, call this number, prove I am handicapped, go through more bureaucracy, and I might be able to get an accessible ride. In no way did I see that I as a tourist could also get help or directions or even a map. On your website, on the front page, please put a new section: Accessibility for tourists. In this section, put links to maps, phone numbers, etc. As taxis in DC charge $20 per ride for people in wheelchairs, the metro makes sense for a lot of handicapped touristswho need this information.

Thank you,
Deena Larsen

Greater Greater Washington occasionally posts letters that raise questions or make points we feel our readers would enjoy seeing and discussing. If you would like to submit a letter, please send it to letters@ggwash.org. If you have feedback on an article you would like to share with other readers, please post it in the comments section of that article instead. 

Comments

Add a comment »

@Mr. Sarles, I may have missed it, but I didn't see an "I'm sorry" or "we're sorry" or any real semblance of an apology... That would have been a good place to start.

by @SamuelMoore on Apr 25, 2011 12:25 pm • linkreport

Honestly after reading her response, I am not too sure of some of the details as she presented them. Personally, despite what she asserts, I have never see any metro entrance that did not have a handicap turnstile (actually two, one going each way). Also, the yellow barriers that metro uses to close off escalators and broken elevators are pretty clearly that and not fancy gates.

I understand everyone is not use to using mass transit, but there is only so much handholidng metro can do. Yes it would be nice if metro had enough staff to immediatly print out signs and post them on every broken piece of equipment as soon as they break, but that is not really feasible with its resources.

by nathaniel on Apr 25, 2011 12:37 pm • linkreport

@samuelMoore I dont see why Mr. Sarles needs to say I am sorry, its not his fault the systems isnt up to pair and on a said not DC is the only system in the country that has wheelchair access

by Jerome on Apr 25, 2011 12:38 pm • linkreport

@Jerome, he's the CEO - with it comes the responsibility for the entire system. Of course it's his job to apologize when that system fails miserably.

Nit-picking aside, I think that it's pretty obvious that the measures that Mr. Sarles BELIEVES are in place, aren't actually in place in all cases. Which, points (as usual) to WMATA management not doing their jobs.

by Ryan S on Apr 25, 2011 12:42 pm • linkreport

I'm not saying hand holding is necessary, and as a visually handicapped rider, I find the system adequate (a little dark perhaps). However Mr. Sarles was responding to her first letter of complaint to the editor. And anyone who read that would come to the conclusion that an apology, of some kind, was warranted.

Either way, the intern/PR person who wrote his response needs to do a better job at caring, and not listing off facts and figures so much...

by @SamuelMoore on Apr 25, 2011 12:50 pm • linkreport

I'd bet money that Mr. Sarles response is the same response to complaints from disabled riders that Catoe's PR people used, with minor adjustments...

by @SamuelMoore on Apr 25, 2011 12:52 pm • linkreport

@nathaniel, agreed. I wonder which station she is referring to. Granted I've not been through every station, but I have also never through an entrance that didn't have at least one wider, accessible gate and the station manager's swing gate.

by Mel on Apr 25, 2011 1:07 pm • linkreport

Why require people to call for help? Surely good signage would be a lot cheaper. Besides, you do not know you are going to need help until you get there.

by SJE on Apr 25, 2011 1:09 pm • linkreport

9 years ago I thought the whole DC area was doing a heck of a job providing accessibile everything....

then I ended up in a wheelchair.

And found:

I still need to do everything I did BC (before chair) and How Badly the "accessible stuff" is at being, well, accessible.

Until you've been on wheels long enough to have to get a new set of tires, you literally have no idea.

I certainly didn't.

by Hell_On_Wheelz on Apr 25, 2011 1:39 pm • linkreport

The signage for the Union Station elevator is borderline nonexistent (it's on the platform signs which is helpful if you're getting off of a train there but if, like Ms. Larsen, you're already in Union Station and looking for it, I can see how it would be hard to find). I think that her suggestions for a sign at non-accessible entrances telling riders the location of the accessible entrance is a good one, as is the idea for a poster that can be posted in front of a broken elevator explaining what to do/who to contact. The idea of a riders guide for disabled tourists is also a good one - for instance if tourists can call a number to help them plan what to expect ahead of time, that should be advertised more visibly on the website.

by grumpy on Apr 25, 2011 1:44 pm • linkreport

@nathaniel - "While each station may have at least one accessible entrance, there are many station entrances that do require steps. Once you navigate these steps, you will find that the turnstiles do not accommodate wheelchairs (or strollers or ...)." Key words, at least one accessible entrance. Perhaps we should look harder at ALL of the 2 stations she named entrances to she if she is recalling correctly.
I get the felling most stations (mostly those outside DC) are very wheelchair accesable, and our poor visitor happened to come to two badly planned stations for the "wheelchair bound".

by Richard B on Apr 25, 2011 3:03 pm • linkreport

@richard B

I was actually taking issue with the line "you will find that the turnstiles do not accomodate wheelchairs (or strollers or..)" All metro stations I have seen have turnstiles that accomodate wheelchairs.

by nathaniel on Apr 25, 2011 4:18 pm • linkreport

@ nathaniel: I recently had a foot injury making it hard to walk. I was able to move around, although it cost more energy. I was surprised how hard it can be to move around in metro with an injury. I always though metro was very nice for handicapped people. It is not. You can navigate metro with a handicap, but it is much harder than you think. Signage is poor, and the extra time and distance involved is not to be underestimated. I thought I knew most stations well. But finding my way around looking for elevators and an eye-opening experience.

My advise to everyone who thinks metro is a breeze for handicapped people is to try it. Get yourself a crutch, hang a block to a foot, and see how far you get.

by Jasper on Apr 25, 2011 5:01 pm • linkreport

He responded. She responded better. Metro has seen a steep decline in service over the last number of years. Changes need to be made - perhaps including its leadership.

by David G on Apr 25, 2011 5:42 pm • linkreport

I don't doubt that Metro is extremely difficult to navigate in a wheelchair, but as many of the readers of this blog are normally so quick to do when it's at Metro's expense, let's look at other systems. The fact that EVERY Metro station is wheelchair accessible (when the elevators are working) is pretty impressive and uncommon. Metro does also provide some accommodation for getting around out of service escalators, but I recognize that shuttles are less than an ideal way to handle that problem. As to the information about elevator locations, that information is available on Metro's website for every station through Station Masters. When I first moved here, before I was really more familiar with Metro than most tourists, I figured out to look at Station Masters when I was trying to go somewhere new.

I'm sure this was a frustrating situation, but I think Metro deserves a lot more consideration on it than they've gotten.

by Dave on Apr 26, 2011 12:11 am • linkreport

And as for the literature she was asking about:
http://www.wmata.com/accessibility/doc/sd_tips_brochure.pdf

Which I assume you could probably even get Metro to mail you if you called for a printed version. It's not unreasonable to ask disabled riders to do a little research, by which I mean making a simple phone call or taking 5 minutes to look at the accessible section of the website, to orient themselves to the system. Frankly, I think every tourist ought to do it before they get here.

I think what's really going on here is rather than looking for a real solution, she was frustrated and wanted to complain.

by Dave on Apr 26, 2011 12:24 am • linkreport

I have taken trips with my bike on the metro exactly twice, and one of those times, I got so frustrated at the metro that I picked up my bike and carried it up some stairs (against metro policy). I can definitely see how those in wheelchairs (especially tourists in wheelchairs) would find metro use prohibitive.

by Andrew on Apr 26, 2011 5:17 pm • linkreport

I met with several officials of the WMATA and we toured the Union Station, Smithsonnian, Gallery Place, and Farragut West. This was enlightening for all: The WMATA officials saw that in several places, trees obscured the elevators, signs provided by escalators were not provided by elevators, and it is hard to manuever.

I saw that it is not an easy proposition to have signs for the 85 metro stations--and that sign stealing is a huge problem. So, this is an issue, and folks are working to address it...

by Deena Larsen on May 26, 2011 7:29 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or