Links
Afternoon links: Budget surprises
New revenue funds few priorities: DC's revenue estimates have risen by $77 million, but that's not enough to fund more police officers, affordable housing or any of the original conditional items after the council put green teams and Medicaid expenses ahead in the queue. (Washington Times)
Councilmembers should read amendments: The DC Council approved a huge smoking ban exemption at the last minute during the budget, but didn't mean to pass what they passed. Phil Mendelson may be the only one who actually read the language. Maybe they should avoid voting on things they haven't read in the future. (Smoke Free DC)
Residents obeying laws more: Great news: street sweeping and red light enforcement tickets are pulling in less revenue than expected because people are actually following the laws, stopping at lights, and moving cars out of the way for street sweeping. (WTOP)
NJ rep takes money from NJ rails: New Jersey Congressman Rodney Frelinghuysen added an appropriations amendment to cut all the HSR money awarded to the Northeast Corridor and use it for Mississippi River flood control. (Star-Ledger)
Return of the luxury train: A West Virginia resort is building a private luxury train that will travel once a week from DC to the resort and back. Round trip tickets will cost $650. (Charleston Gazette)
Women biking = the economy?: Why don't more women bike? Commonly cited reasons are "fear and fashion," but maybe it's really the economy (which could also partly explain why more women bike in DC than most places). (Grist)
So much for conservation: To lower gas prices, the Obama Administration decided to release 30 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserves. We might as well assume that a carbon tax or a gas tax increase is dead. (AP)
Hampshire-Cowen for TOD, solutions: New Prince George's WMATA Board member Artis Hampshire-Cowan wants to see more TOD in Prince George's, and otherwise, generally "want[s] to be part of the solution." (Post)
Council opposes Western Bypass: A Virginia town is speaking out against the Western Bypass. This particular one isn't the Outer Beltway DC area road lobbyists have been pushing, but a similarly sprawl-inducing freeway outside Charlottesville. (Daily Progress)
Have a tip for the links? Submit it here.
Comments
VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- Understanding can help cyclists, drivers better share the road
- Half-hour Metro headways are not acceptable
- "Degree density" maps show region's east-west divide
- Give up your seat on the bus or train to those in need
- Planners are the new public health officials
- Anti-transit ideology endangers Silver Line
Mon May 21
Wed May 23
12:00 pm Live chat with Matt Yglesias
Wed May 30
10:00 am Bike-ped safety enforcement hearing







by NikolasM on Jun 23, 2011 5:47 pm
While I'm all for the smoking ban, as I think it makes for a much more enjoyable evening out not having to worry about your neighbor lighting up, if these hotels are going to have events for smokers, it's only fair that these smokers get exempted as needed. For years everyone smoked everywhere ... and while it's not pleasant for non-smokers, they've never proved a link to cancer or anything else from second-hand smoke. I know it made it easier to pass the law if we all pretended it was 'for the employees', but let's not push this to irrational lengths. If a bunch of smokers want an event in a conference room they've rented, they should be able to do it every night of the year. It's about as fundamental a freedom for these folks as is that reporter's right to report.
by Lance on Jun 23, 2011 10:03 pm
by Michael Perkins on Jun 23, 2011 10:27 pm
by Matt Glazewski on Jun 24, 2011 6:52 am
What should they have done? The city center has been built out for decades and they area has had tremendous population growth. The area is still too small for rapid transit. If anyone has any bright ideas for dealing with that situation that don't involve road widening, I'd love to hear them.
by movement on Jun 24, 2011 7:02 am
by Lance on Jun 24, 2011 8:37 am
by Froggie on Jun 24, 2011 8:40 am
by Froggie on Jun 24, 2011 8:42 am
by ksu499 on Jun 24, 2011 8:58 am
For years everyone smoked everywhere ... and while it's not pleasant for non-smokers, they've never proved a link to cancer or anything else from second-hand smoke.
from www.cancer.gov:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/ETS
Does exposure to secondhand smoke cause cancer?
Yes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Surgeon General, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have all classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen (a cancer-causing agent) (1, 3, 5, 7).
Inhaling secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in nonsmoking adults (4, 5). Approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths occur each year among adult nonsmokers in the United States as a result of exposure to secondhand smoke (2). The U.S. Surgeon General estimates that living with a smoker increases a nonsmokers chances of developing lung cancer by 20 to 30 percent (4).
Some research also suggests that secondhand smoke may increase the risk of breast cancer, nasal sinus cavity cancer, and nasopharyngeal cancer in adults and the risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors in children (4). Additional research is needed to learn whether a link exists between secondhand smoke exposure and these cancers.
by JeffB on Jun 24, 2011 3:07 pm
I'd posted a link confirming that the claim that 3,000 deaths are caused by second hand smoke is from a study that has since been discredited ... But it seems to have disappeared! I will have to find it again.
by Lance on Jun 25, 2011 10:38 am
Add a Comment