Greater Greater Washington. The Washington, DC area is great. But it could be greater.

Government


Bowser, Bulger get WMATA Board, Wells gets planning

The WMATA Board, which has already had most members change in the last year, will see even more turnover as Kwame Brown plans to strip Tommy Wells of his seat along with the transportation committee today.


Photo by thisisbossi on Flickr.

Muriel Bowser would instead represent the DC Council as a voting member, Freeman Klopott reported. Bowser currently chairs the regional Transportation Planning Board. Kwame Brown also recently nominated lobbyist Tom Bulger to replace Michael A Brown as an alternate on the WMATA Board.

In addition to getting oversight of libraries, parks and recreation, Wells would gain oversight of the Office of Planning, says Mike DeBonis. Bowser has transportation expertise and a demonstrated commitment to Metro, and OP is an important agency to oversee. But both moves undermine Brown's stated rationale for rearranging the committees.

The vote hasn't yet been taken. Keep telling Kwame Brown and the council what you think by calling Brown's office at (202) 724-8032 and emailing the council.

Brown, and his number two Mary Cheh, claimed this morning that the change is not vengeful but rather an attempt to better align committees with subject areas. Cheh oversees environmental issues, and she said Brown wants to reunite the environment with public works and transportation. All three were part of a single committee before 2008.

According to Wells, Brown offered the WMATA Board seat to Cheh as well, but she turned it down. If his goal really were to unite policy areas under one committee, he'd have pushed Cheh to either take the seat or not take the committee. Or, if his motive hadn't been payback, he could have just let Wells keep his seat.

Having oversight of planning could give Wells the opportunity to help OP move forward on its zoning rewrite and continue or even expand its good work on neighborhood plans around DC. But OP needs Wells' oversight far less than DDOT, WMATA, the Taxi Commission, and the other transportation agencies do.

And if unifying the Department of the Environment with transportation in a single committee makes sense, it would make even more sense to put it with planning and parks, both of which have a significant environmental impact as well. A Committee on Planning, the Environment, Parks and Recreation seems even more logical than a Committee on Public Works, the Environment, and Transportation.

It still seems evident that this move was motivated more by politics than common sense. That's why Tom Sherwood called Brown's justification for the transportation change "paper thin."

Wells and the other new members of the Board went through many days of orientation to learn the ins and outs of WMATA's operations, budget, policies and safety issues. In doing so, several have said they built up strong working relationships that can foster regional cooperation. Bowser will now have to learn the same material over from scratch, but without the camaraderie that Wells developed. Again, DC will lose momentum, expertise, and relationships, all because of Brown's pique.

Last year, the WMATA Board came under criticism for members acting parochially, which most everyone knew was code for Jim Graham (ward 1)'s penchant for favoring Ward 1 transportation projects. In the last budget, Bowser showed a very parochial attitude toward city programs, focusing entirely on her own ward. Will she do the same on the WMATA Board, pushing needed transportation enhancements for Ward 4 but at the expense of other parts of the city?

Bulger's son ran Brown's Ward 3 operation in his campaign for chair. The Council held roundtable on the nomination last week, but seems never to have posted it anywhere on the Council site; I have an automated system that monitors the calendar for changes, and the word "Bulger" didn't appear until Sunday when it popped up as part of today's Committee of the Whole agenda.

Bulger runs Government Relations, Inc., a federal lobbying firm, which used to lobby for Fairfax County (but does not today). Bulger also told me he was involved with pushing Congress to pass the current federal transit benefit.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington. He has had a lifelong interest in great cities and great communities. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Could GGW (or someone) please post the vote breakdown? It would be helpful to know how individuals actually sided on this one. Thanks!

by Mike on Jul 12, 2011 12:01 pm  (link)

In addition to getting oversight of libraries, parks and recreation, Wells would gain oversight of the Office of Planning, says Mike DeBonis.

Interesting ... so getting oversight of as important a function as the Office of Planning is 'retribution'?

by Lance on Jul 12, 2011 12:01 pm  (link)

Are Bulger and his son any relation to James "Whitey" Bulger, Billy Bulger and the Mass. clan?

by Bob on Jul 12, 2011 12:05 pm  (link)

Lance, the short answer is yes, giving this new committee assignment is payback. There has never been a mid-session reshuffling of a committee chairmanship of this type before. Any mid-session changes in the past were made b/c someone had charges or allegations pending. Tommy ran that committee very well and has clean
hands.

by Mike on Jul 12, 2011 12:14 pm  (link)

Best guess is it's throwing a bone to Wells (and maybe us). It's a meaningful bone, but still just a bone; OP basically is doing great on its own and just needs the Council to leave it alone. DDOT/DCTC/WMATA have major legislative needs.

by David Alpert on Jul 12, 2011 12:16 pm  (link)

@ David Alpert, "A Committee on Planning, the Environment and Parks and Recreations seems even more logical than a Committee on Public Works, the Environment and Transportation"

I will disagree with this, strongly. Explicitly linking the Environment to the two major programmatic areas that significantly affect it (for good or bad) can lead to significant improvement in environmental objectives because they can be made actionable at the department level that have the most day-to-day work and capital projects that create impact (other than DCWASA or whatever it is called these days).

by Some Ideas on Jul 12, 2011 12:35 pm  (link)

I would be interested in knowing what the IP addresses are of the commenters who support this. I wouldn't be surprised if it was city hall.

by anon on Jul 12, 2011 12:50 pm  (link)

The problem intact with Cheh in charge of transportation is that she'll bring a very Ward 3 view of transportation to it. If one of her constituents were to ask her what her proudest transportation achievements was, she'd probably cite the visitors parking pass program. Very popular there, but not exactly progressive. And on the environment, I think she also had a very Ward 3 mindset. Namely that being pro environment is more about keeping green space than conserving energy. Her fight for Klingle Road fits in with that. Nothing wrong in fighting to preserve green space, but it is often used as cover to fight all increases in residential density.

by TM on Jul 12, 2011 12:53 pm  (link)

What does this shift mean for the ongoing 10 year University plans of GU and AU?

by GU Alumnus on Jul 12, 2011 1:10 pm  (link)

I called Chairman Brown's office to urge him to not go ahead with this, and emailed the members of the Council. I think Councilmember Cheh would gain more public respect if she reconsidered jumping at this "opportunity."

@David Alpert, thank you for engaging the public on this. I believe we are well past the point of "Hey, enough of this crap."

I hope Chairman Brown reconsiders his plan here.

by Dennis Jaffe on Jul 12, 2011 1:17 pm  (link)

Anon: If council staff are silly enough to post anonymously from council computers, and they don't realize their IP addresses are traceable...well. You know.

by Geoffrey Hatchard on Jul 12, 2011 1:30 pm  (link)

"What does this shift mean for the ongoing 10 year University plans of GU and AU?"

Absolutely nothing, it's not an issue for the Council and OP already had its say.

by Phil on Jul 12, 2011 1:56 pm  (link)

Any updates?

As for Geoffrey's comment, I think overall, incidents like these show us all how many people affiliated with Council simply do not exercise good judgment, regardless of context or forum. Why wasn't this proposal made until the last minute?

Is it too early or impractical to begin dicussing how citizens might recall the Council Chair?

by Mike on Jul 12, 2011 2:25 pm  (link)

The vote was 12-1, with Wells the lone dissenter.

by Rudi on Jul 12, 2011 3:07 pm  (link)


Politically this was a brilliant move for Brown. He just disciplined the Council, better secured his political base and checked the GGW Crew. Pacified his rivals. Then is going to duck out for the summer and ride-out any bad PR.

by W Jordan on Jul 12, 2011 5:03 pm  (link)

W. Jordan: "check the GGW crew"

Do so many LTR's think that this blog is akin to the drug running gangs in the city? DC loves it's little crews.

Garfield Terrace props ya'll.

by greent on Jul 12, 2011 5:24 pm  (link)


Most crews are not drug running gangs, just cliques of folk hanging out talking trash and having fun.

Brown just called the GGW Crew's political bluff. Don't get me wrong I am not overly pleased with CM Brown at this point but for different reasons.

by W Jordan on Jul 12, 2011 5:52 pm  (link)

I don't know what the political and interpersonal dynamics are between members of the city council, but considering that this change came with virtually no warning or public discussion and then passed 12-1 would seem to indicate pretty broad consensus on the council that Wells needed to be knocked down a peg or two. Kwame Brown is an embarrassment and I look very skeptically at anything he does. But everyone (besides the victim) voted for this. It looks like Tommy Wells has some serious fence-mending to do with his colleagues, and while his friends here certainly should not (and I'm sure will not) abandon him, they probably need to think about finding some more politically savvy champions as well.

by Peter on Jul 12, 2011 7:35 pm  (link)

If whacking Wells is a "brilliant move," then it's Kwame Brown's first of the year. He's a man under investigation by the US Attorney's Office for ethical lapses that might lead to criminal charges. He's the poster boy for DC politicos who treat their office as an entitlement and a cash cow. He's watching the political base that has made his career possible erode away, month after month, year after year, replaced by people smart enough and active enough to send him and his cronies packing.

by Matt W on Jul 12, 2011 7:38 pm  (link)


The GGW Crew needs to mature. GGW Crew rose to a level of influence by skipping steps and playing the same politics that now seems to be failing them. It's just how politics works. The GGW Crew was willing to go along with CM Graham as corrupt as his chairmanship was. Many of the things some in the GGW Crew support is as ethically challenged as the politicians they critique.

by W Jordan on Jul 12, 2011 8:52 pm  (link)

I support Councilman Wells. And I wrote to every council person this am.

The other folks may have won this battle but Wells will win the war. Oh yeah, and nearly everyone, good luck staying out of prison.

by H Street Landlord on Jul 12, 2011 9:15 pm  (link)

Maybe part of the GGW Crew's problem is that they keep expecting DC politics to act like a modern American city, with policy-based, utilitarian-directed, ideological coalitions instead of a Mexican-style mashup of panideological camarillas and ignored constituencies.

by ADW on Jul 12, 2011 9:53 pm  (link)


I'm not excusing the nonsense that goes on, but please grow up. The problem is that you, the GGW Urban Disney Crew, is as much a part of the problem the folk you point the fingers at. The biggest ethical problem facings this city is not some fancy SUV, but unchecked so-called gentrification.

by W Jordan on Jul 13, 2011 6:55 am  (link)

W Jordan, please enlighten us-- what is "unchecked so-called gentrification"?

by Mike on Jul 13, 2011 9:05 am  (link)

I'm not excusing the nonsense that goes on, but please grow up. The problem is that you, the GGW Urban Disney Crew, is as much a part of the problem the folk you point the fingers at. The biggest ethical problem facings this city is not some fancy SUV, but unchecked so-called gentrification.

This could've been written in DC's darkest days of the 80s or early 90s: "Sure the council is corrupt and ineffective, the schools are a morass of dysfunction, and people are getting mown down in the streets, but the *real* problem is...The Plan".

Compelling stuff.

by oboe on Jul 13, 2011 9:15 am  (link)

CM Brown. The war is on/ this don't look good

by Peter bug on Jul 13, 2011 9:31 am  (link)

WCP Loose Lips' critique of Kwame's maneuvering was excellent. It could have been a brilliant move -- if he had controlled the message. Now he's getting blistering editorials and a lot of negative buzz about. Wells got his martyr meme out first.

Now Cheh has mud all over her face. We'll see how her constituents respond to her BFF behavior with Brown.

by lou on Jul 13, 2011 10:15 am  (link)

This is a truly sad story and unfortunate cascade of events. It's even worse if Wells really did contact GGW who then ran with a story. I sincerely don't believe this latest series has helped the city in any measurable way. What is has done is deepened an ever increasing chasm.

Although it's clear that no one from this community cared, but how can you explain the fact that this was passed on a 12-1 margin? How is it humanely possible that Wells is the lone soldier/victim here? 12-1? Wasn't that the same ratio as when Marion Barry was censured?

This is sad.

Really Really Sad.

by HogWash on Jul 13, 2011 10:40 am  (link)

Oops!

Really Really Sad.

by HogWash on Jul 13, 2011 10:41 am  (link)

I emailed the council members explaining my disappointment and disgust at the fact that no one will stand up against this guy. The only response I have received so far was from Mary Cheh. Here is her reply:
Whoa. CM Brown had to reshuffle things because newly elected Vincent Orange had to be assigned a committee and arrangements had to be made to account for Mr Thomas losing his committee. CM Brown reconfigured committees along better functional lines including placing transportation and public works under the comm on the environment. Mr Wells has planning and parks and rec and libraries, feeding into his strenths in the planning, open space area.
The actions have to be viewed in light of the overall shifts, and even tho I understand CM Wells disappointment his portrayal that this was all about him is really not correct.
Regards
Mary Cheh

by Greg on Jul 13, 2011 12:56 pm  (link)

This is a truly sad story and unfortunate cascade of events. It's even worse if Wells really did contact GGW who then ran with a story.

In the words of Finley Peter Dunne, "Politics ain't beanbag." From this point on, Brown deserves whatever kind of fuckover that Wells can muster. Should be entertaining if nothing else.

by oboe on Jul 13, 2011 1:46 pm  (link)

Whoa. CM Brown had to reshuffle things because newly elected Vincent Orange had to be assigned a committee and arrangements had to be made to account for Mr Thomas losing his committee. CM Brown reconfigured committees along better functional lines including placing transportation and public works under the comm on the environment. Mr Wells has planning and parks and rec and libraries, feeding into his strenths in the planning, open space area.
The actions have to be viewed in light of the overall shifts, and even tho I understand CM Wells disappointment his portrayal that this was all about him is really not correct.

Wow. Gutless *and* dissembling. A winning combination.

by oboe on Jul 13, 2011 1:48 pm  (link)

I lived in Ward 4 from 2007 until last year and regularly rode the 52-54, S1-S9, and E2-E4 lines and never saw Bowser on the bus.

by DC Bus Rider on Jul 15, 2011 7:18 pm  (link)

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.

Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)

or see below to post

To post your comment, please enter the two words in the box below to prevent spam:

Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time