Government
Bowser, Bulger get WMATA Board, Wells gets planning
The WMATA Board, which has already had most members change in the last year, will see even more turnover as Kwame Brown plans to strip Tommy Wells of his seat along with the transportation committee today.
Muriel Bowser would instead represent the DC Council as a voting member, Freeman Klopott reported. Bowser currently chairs the regional Transportation Planning Board. Kwame Brown also recently nominated lobbyist Tom Bulger to replace Michael A Brown as an alternate on the WMATA Board.
In addition to getting oversight of libraries, parks and recreation, Wells would gain oversight of the Office of Planning, says Mike DeBonis. Bowser has transportation expertise and a demonstrated commitment to Metro, and OP is an important agency to oversee. But both moves undermine Brown's stated rationale for rearranging the committees.
The vote hasn't yet been taken. Keep telling Kwame Brown and the council what you think by calling Brown's office at (202) 724-8032 and emailing the council.
Brown, and his number two Mary Cheh, claimed this morning that the change is not vengeful but rather an attempt to better align committees with subject areas. Cheh oversees environmental issues, and she said Brown wants to reunite the environment with public works and transportation. All three were part of a single committee before 2008.
According to Wells, Brown offered the WMATA Board seat to Cheh as well, but she turned it down. If his goal really were to unite policy areas under one committee, he'd have pushed Cheh to either take the seat or not take the committee. Or, if his motive hadn't been payback, he could have just let Wells keep his seat.
Having oversight of planning could give Wells the opportunity to help OP move forward on its zoning rewrite and continue or even expand its good work on neighborhood plans around DC. But OP needs Wells' oversight far less than DDOT, WMATA, the Taxi Commission, and the other transportation agencies do.
And if unifying the Department of the Environment with transportation in a single committee makes sense, it would make even more sense to put it with planning and parks, both of which have a significant environmental impact as well. A Committee on Planning, the Environment, Parks and Recreation seems even more logical than a Committee on Public Works, the Environment, and Transportation.
It still seems evident that this move was motivated more by politics than common sense. That's why Tom Sherwood called Brown's justification for the transportation change "paper thin."
Wells and the other new members of the Board went through many days of orientation to learn the ins and outs of WMATA's operations, budget, policies and safety issues. In doing so, several have said they built up strong working relationships that can foster regional cooperation. Bowser will now have to learn the same material over from scratch, but without the camaraderie that Wells developed. Again, DC will lose momentum, expertise, and relationships, all because of Brown's pique.
Last year, the WMATA Board came under criticism for members acting parochially, which most everyone knew was code for Jim Graham (ward 1)'s penchant for favoring Ward 1 transportation projects. In the last budget, Bowser showed a very parochial attitude toward city programs, focusing entirely on her own ward. Will she do the same on the WMATA Board, pushing needed transportation enhancements for Ward 4 but at the expense of other parts of the city?
Bulger's son ran Brown's Ward 3 operation in his campaign for chair. The Council held roundtable on the nomination last week, but seems never to have posted it anywhere on the Council site; I have an automated system that monitors the calendar for changes, and the word "Bulger" didn't appear until Sunday when it popped up as part of today's Committee of the Whole agenda.
Bulger runs Government Relations, Inc., a federal lobbying firm, which used to lobby for Fairfax County (but does not today). Bulger also told me he was involved with pushing Congress to pass the current federal transit benefit.
Comments
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- Understanding can help cyclists, drivers better share the road
- Half-hour Metro headways are not acceptable
- "Degree density" maps show region's east-west divide
- Give up your seat on the bus or train to those in need
- Planners are the new public health officials
- Anti-transit ideology endangers Silver Line







by Mike on Jul 12, 2011 12:01 pm
Interesting ... so getting oversight of as important a function as the Office of Planning is 'retribution'?
by Lance on Jul 12, 2011 12:01 pm
by Bob on Jul 12, 2011 12:05 pm
hands.
by Mike on Jul 12, 2011 12:14 pm
by David Alpert on Jul 12, 2011 12:16 pm
I will disagree with this, strongly. Explicitly linking the Environment to the two major programmatic areas that significantly affect it (for good or bad) can lead to significant improvement in environmental objectives because they can be made actionable at the department level that have the most day-to-day work and capital projects that create impact (other than DCWASA or whatever it is called these days).
by Some Ideas on Jul 12, 2011 12:35 pm
by anon on Jul 12, 2011 12:50 pm
by TM on Jul 12, 2011 12:53 pm
by GU Alumnus on Jul 12, 2011 1:10 pm
@David Alpert, thank you for engaging the public on this. I believe we are well past the point of "Hey, enough of this crap."
I hope Chairman Brown reconsiders his plan here.
by Dennis Jaffe on Jul 12, 2011 1:17 pm
by Geoffrey Hatchard on Jul 12, 2011 1:30 pm
Absolutely nothing, it's not an issue for the Council and OP already had its say.
by Phil on Jul 12, 2011 1:56 pm
As for Geoffrey's comment, I think overall, incidents like these show us all how many people affiliated with Council simply do not exercise good judgment, regardless of context or forum. Why wasn't this proposal made until the last minute?
Is it too early or impractical to begin dicussing how citizens might recall the Council Chair?
by Mike on Jul 12, 2011 2:25 pm
by Rudi on Jul 12, 2011 3:07 pm
Politically this was a brilliant move for Brown. He just disciplined the Council, better secured his political base and checked the GGW Crew. Pacified his rivals. Then is going to duck out for the summer and ride-out any bad PR.
by W Jordan on Jul 12, 2011 5:03 pm
Do so many LTR's think that this blog is akin to the drug running gangs in the city? DC loves it's little crews.
Garfield Terrace props ya'll.
by greent on Jul 12, 2011 5:24 pm
Most crews are not drug running gangs, just cliques of folk hanging out talking trash and having fun.
Brown just called the GGW Crew's political bluff. Don't get me wrong I am not overly pleased with CM Brown at this point but for different reasons.
by W Jordan on Jul 12, 2011 5:52 pm
by Peter on Jul 12, 2011 7:35 pm
by Matt W on Jul 12, 2011 7:38 pm
The GGW Crew needs to mature. GGW Crew rose to a level of influence by skipping steps and playing the same politics that now seems to be failing them. It's just how politics works. The GGW Crew was willing to go along with CM Graham as corrupt as his chairmanship was. Many of the things some in the GGW Crew support is as ethically challenged as the politicians they critique.
by W Jordan on Jul 12, 2011 8:52 pm
The other folks may have won this battle but Wells will win the war. Oh yeah, and nearly everyone, good luck staying out of prison.
by H Street Landlord on Jul 12, 2011 9:15 pm
by ADW on Jul 12, 2011 9:53 pm
I'm not excusing the nonsense that goes on, but please grow up. The problem is that you, the GGW Urban Disney Crew, is as much a part of the problem the folk you point the fingers at. The biggest ethical problem facings this city is not some fancy SUV, but unchecked so-called gentrification.
by W Jordan on Jul 13, 2011 6:55 am
by Mike on Jul 13, 2011 9:05 am
This could've been written in DC's darkest days of the 80s or early 90s: "Sure the council is corrupt and ineffective, the schools are a morass of dysfunction, and people are getting mown down in the streets, but the *real* problem is...The Plan".
Compelling stuff.
by oboe on Jul 13, 2011 9:15 am
by Peter bug on Jul 13, 2011 9:31 am
Now Cheh has mud all over her face. We'll see how her constituents respond to her BFF behavior with Brown.
by lou on Jul 13, 2011 10:15 am
Although it's clear that no one from this community cared, but how can you explain the fact that this was passed on a 12-1 margin? How is it humanely possible that Wells is the lone soldier/victim here? 12-1? Wasn't that the same ratio as when Marion Barry was censured?
This is sad.
Really Really Sad.
by HogWash on Jul 13, 2011 10:40 am
Really Really Sad.
by HogWash on Jul 13, 2011 10:41 am
Whoa. CM Brown had to reshuffle things because newly elected Vincent Orange had to be assigned a committee and arrangements had to be made to account for Mr Thomas losing his committee. CM Brown reconfigured committees along better functional lines including placing transportation and public works under the comm on the environment. Mr Wells has planning and parks and rec and libraries, feeding into his strenths in the planning, open space area.
The actions have to be viewed in light of the overall shifts, and even tho I understand CM Wells disappointment his portrayal that this was all about him is really not correct.
Regards
Mary Cheh
by Greg on Jul 13, 2011 12:56 pm
In the words of Finley Peter Dunne, "Politics ain't beanbag." From this point on, Brown deserves whatever kind of fuckover that Wells can muster. Should be entertaining if nothing else.
by oboe on Jul 13, 2011 1:46 pm
The actions have to be viewed in light of the overall shifts, and even tho I understand CM Wells disappointment his portrayal that this was all about him is really not correct.
Wow. Gutless *and* dissembling. A winning combination.
by oboe on Jul 13, 2011 1:48 pm
by DC Bus Rider on Jul 15, 2011 7:18 pm
Add a Comment