Greater Greater Washington

COG climate change report briefing tomorrow

Climate experts from the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) are briefing the DC Council tomorrow about COG's Climate Change Report. Produced by a steering committee co-chaired by Councilmember Mary Cheh, MoCoCo's Nancy Floreen and Fairfax's Gerry Connolly (likely the next Congressman from NoVa), the report gives 78 recommendations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the Washington region.


Photo by Simone Ramella on Flickr.

After listing the clear and overwhelming evidence for global warming caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, it divides recommendations into those for energy consumption (heating, lighting, commercial operations, residential appliances, etc.) and transportation and land use. Since 30% of emissions come from transportation (the report claims), 30% of the recommendations cover reducing vehicle emissions and VMT.

Transportation-related recommendations include incentives for buying hybrids, shifting short trips from driving to other modes, promoting car sharing, mixed-use and transit-oriented development, transit expansion, bicycle and pedestrian paths, focusing new development around walkable areas, and more good ideas.

Of course, the real issue is implementation. At the same time MoCoCo's Floreen and Roger Berliner, Prince George's Councilmember Camille Exum, and Maryland Department of the Environment officials were devising these recommendations, Maryland was hard at work blowing most of the state's transportation budget on the ICC, which violates nearly every recommendation in the report. Prince George's is putting their development far from transit. Virginia is doing a bit better in the policy department by pushing for Dulles Metrorail and many smaller transit improvements, but is also pouring huge money into widening the Beltway, which will surely not reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

These projects have been on the board for many years. If regional officials are serious about curbing climate change, they need to step up and start pushing different priorities. Mary Cheh and Tommy Wells plan some environmental legislation this fall, and I look forward to that. We should expect Floreen, Berliner, Exum, Connolly, Fairfax's John Foust, Loudoun's Andrea McGimsey, Alexandria's Del Pepper, Falls Church's David Snyder, and all the other members of the Climate Change Steering Committee to put their votes where their mouths are and change the course of transportation spending and land use decisions in DC and, especially, the suburbs.

You can hear more about the report tomorrow (Tuesday), from 10 am to noon at the Wilson Building (1350 Penn. NW), Room 412.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time
Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

David Alpert is the founder and editor-in-chief of Greater Greater Washington. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He now lives with his wife and daughter in Dupont Circle. 

Comments

California has a great law in allocating transit funding in accordance to CO2 emission reductions, as was posted earlier on this site. Our area's state and local governments can pass similar laws. We should also look for other CO2 "plays" in other sectors that are already affected by government funding, so they can be targeted also.

We should also not lose sight of the national security issue involved in fossil fuel imports. Our money is going to support terrorists, Russian tyranny, Hugo Chavez and his minions, and so on. We would not be fighting in Iraq if it were not for its and its neighbors' oil. The first Gulf War was all about oil. The current one is a direct result of the first one. Meanwhile, we are fortunate to have a thoroughly corrupt and incompetent Iranian government. Otherwise, it would be more stable and making even more trouble than it is now.

by Chuck Coleman on Aug 26, 2008 9:18 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or