Sustainability
Novel rooftop house is attractive. Is it practical?
An unconventional entry in this year's Solar Decathlon brings low-footprint home design to city rooftops. It has pleased the crowds, but not the judges because it has two significant drawbacks: comfort and up-front cost.
This year's Solar Decathlon is being held in West Potomac Park, near the Franklin D. Roosevelt Memorial. The event will wrap up this Sunday, and you can see this home and others if you head down to the event.
Team New York, comprised of students from City College of New York, brings to this year's Decathlon (sponsored by the US Department of Energy) an innovative attempt to embrace an oft-neglected urban surface. Their "Solar Roofpod" is a 746-square-foot home specifically intended to be built on top of the existing flat roofs of the four- to ten-story buildings that cover much of the Big Apple.
"Solar Roofpod" may not be winning in the Solar Decathlon's ratings, but the inventive design has sparked plenty of talk about the feasibility of its premise. At less than 800 square feet, the home resembles in size many Manhattan apartments, but claims to reduce utility expenses by $2,500 annually by generating 11.6 megawatt hours of electricity per year through its solar panel system.
Situated on a rooftop, the home has direct access to light, wind, and water, which the team claims will help reduce overall energy costs in conjunction with the energy-conserving design. The module doesn't neglect to take its "host building" into account either: a steel beam Dunnage Garden built around the home helps protect the building below from absorbing the pod's radiation, and provides space for a rooftop garden.
Despite Team New York's obvious ingenuity, its current standing at number 18 out of 19 participating teams doesn't bode well for the potential feasibility of the project on a larger scale.Although not all of the ten judging metrics have been scored yet, TNY did not fare well on Affordability, coming in second to last with a rating of 61.4 out of 100 possible points. Affordability is an extremely significant metric in this contest, as the Decathlon touts "cost-effective, energy-efficient, and attractive" home design ideas. Though, perhaps unsurprisingly, the judges' dismal score hasn't hurt the public's impression of the Solar Roofpod. Team New York is currently in second place in the People's Choice Awards, in which the public votes on their favorite house.
From an urban planning perspective, the Solar Roofpod offers a space-conscious solution for building new single-family units in an already fully-developed neighborhood and promotes greater use of solar photovoltaic panels and rooftop gardens. There may not be much room in New York's densely packed streets to build new detached townhouses, but there's certainly open space available on top of its existing buildings to give an individual, or perhaps a couple, room to stretch out.
Solar Roofpod's popularity seems to indicate willingness on the part of Americans to suspend their disbelief and imagine what a city like New York might look like if, on top of large office and apartment buildings, one might be able to look up and see a diminutive home. But because of its shortcomings in practicality and livability
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Parklets give every block a little park








by Tim on Sep 28, 2011 12:33 pm • link • report
by Jon on Sep 28, 2011 12:39 pm • link • report
by Lance on Sep 28, 2011 12:40 pm • link • report
by IsoTopor on Sep 28, 2011 1:52 pm • link • report
The idea for Solar Roofpod is that the small footprint allows construction of living space on a much larger roof without the necessity of building another floor. On especially large roofs, multiple units may be deployed. See http://ccnysolardecathlon.com/
Unfortunately for TNY, half of the competition has been decided and the team fell into the near-bottom in almost all of them, including dead last in comfort. Too bad, too, because I think it's a great prototype design, but as indicated, too limited for larger deployment.
by Jack Love on Sep 28, 2011 2:50 pm • link • report
by Jack Love on Sep 28, 2011 2:56 pm • link • report
The entry from Parsons The New School for Design and Stevens Institute of Technology, called EmpowerHouse, will become a home for a family in the Deanwood section of Washington.
by Jack Love on Sep 28, 2011 3:04 pm • link • report
by tom veil on Sep 28, 2011 3:50 pm • link • report
by beatbox on Sep 28, 2011 4:41 pm • link • report
New Zealand was a close second. Southern Hemisphere, represent!
The Purdue house was probably the largest and most conventional, which would please a lot of people, but I found it suburbia-bland. It might be the first in the decathlon's history to feature a garage, but it looks like a mobile home on the outside. Also, the fact that one of the team members didn't know what "ADA compliant" means was a bit off-putting.
by Banksy on Sep 28, 2011 4:53 pm • link • report
by Anonymous on Sep 29, 2011 12:35 am • link • report
by Dan Maceda on Sep 29, 2011 10:01 am • link • report
Current practice for housing mechanical systems (HVAC, Boilers, etc.) for mid-rise and high-rise buildings is to house equipment on the roof. And even if things like chillers and boilers are in the basement, the cooling towers are inevitably place up on the roof. But by most measures the most valuable real estate for a typical commercial/residential mid-highrise building is at the top.
Take a look at this image comparing two buildings with completely different approaches to rooftop use:
http://goo.gl/2uah4
The roofpod goes part way towards addressing the issue, but really, who wants to live on top of a building with a bunch of mechanical equipment - or worse yet, loud fans spinning all the time.
A far better solution - both for property value and efficient energy use is something like the District Heating concept or a Combined Heat and Power plant at the building or nearby.
For local generation, utilizing parking spaces for equipment is a far better use of space: they are are low-value real estate that never pay for themselves anyways (esp. in a place like NYC).
by Bilsko on Sep 29, 2011 10:43 am • link • report
by Mike on Sep 29, 2011 12:04 pm • link • report
Add a Comment