Politics
Greig: The DC Council and Ward 2 need a fresh start
The District of Columbia is at a turning point. The strategically important issues for our city's future are broader now than they were 20 years ago.

Fiona Greig, Ward 2 Council candidate
This is particularly true for Ward 2 where I live with my husband and daughter. It's time to think more boldly about our future as a city and to pivot to a broader strategic agenda.
Unfortunately, our council too often holds the city and my ward back through a focus on yesterday's challenges and successes. Instead, members should be asking what are the issues that must become central to the Council's agenda going forward?
There are many, but foremost amongst them is growing the tax base by retaining families, creating smarter government and ending conflicts of interest on the council.
20 years ago the city was hemorrhaging residents and attracting few new residents to take their place. This damaged our tax base, and contributed to our fiscal problems.
Today, attracting new residents isn't a problem One would expect that the DC Council would have pivoted to focus on schools, parks and walkable, livable communities. Yet we still have councilmembers who see parks and transportation as constituent services, not as the linchpins to improving our city's fiscal position. We have councilmembers who disengage from education issues instead of holding the Mayor accountable for outcomes in their Ward.
In Ward 2, parents aren't asked by their councilmember what would convince them to send their kids to their public schools. Their councilmember isn't engaged in the discussion on middle schools, despite the fact that half the elementary schools in Ward 2 feed into a middle school (Shaw) with 29% reading proficiency.
20 years ago the city was mired in bloated, slow-moving agencies that couldn't deliver basic government services. Today, DC agencies generally deliver the services that residents pay for with their taxes.
The challenge for the future is to deliver more with less through smarter government. Yet we still have councilmembers who believe that 5% across the board cuts will make government more efficient. Instead, we must look to re-engineer government processes to squeeze out waste and fraud in a targeted way.
Earlier this year, KPMG warned in an audit that conditions at the Office of Tax and Revenue were ripe for continued theft, and sure enough another theft was discovered last month. My own councilmember refuses to hold hearings on the conditions at the Office of Tax and Revenue, which is under his oversight. He says, "My job is to do oversight. It's not to catch people who are stealing".
Our council won't be able to effectively address this new strategic agenda while it's mired in the ethics scandals that have so tarnished the city's past. With this next election, it's time to send a message that conflicts of interest are no longer tolerated and that ethics scandals are not just embarrassing to the Council, but, more importantly, to residents.
My councilmember has not offered any ethics legislation and has said the problem the Council is facing "is not because the laws need changing." I couldn't disagree more. Even the General Counsel for the Board of Elections and Ethics says that "the ethics laws of the district are not sufficient."
Do you believe that the DC Council needs a bolder vision for the future? What do you believe the strategic issues are that the council must address?
Come out and let me know what you think tonight, Thursday, October 27th, 6:30 pm at Stoneys (1433 P Street, NW). I'll be there with others who want to move past ethics scandals and yesterday's news and start talking about the future of the District of Columbia.
Fiona Greig is a prospective candidate for the DC Council from Ward 2. The views in this article are hers and do not necessarily represent those of Greater Greater Washington. We invite all candidates running for the DC Council to share their views with our community, but reserve the right to edit posts to fit our content and format rules. If you are a candidate and would like to submit an article, please contact endorsements@ggwash.org.
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- PG planners propose bold new smart growth future
- Prince George's County struggles to get trails right
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger






by oboe on Oct 27, 2011 10:33 am • link • report
by Steven Yates on Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am • link • report
You could elect Gandhi and no one would care about the needs of Ward 2 residents.
by eb on Oct 27, 2011 11:24 am • link • report
by pagodat on Oct 27, 2011 11:37 am • link • report
Southwest (at least the part people live in) is in Ward 6.
by Steven Yates on Oct 27, 2011 11:40 am • link • report
I'm a supporter of cycletracks, so the about face was welcome to me. However, it was clear that Evans does not do his own legwork or form his own opinions before making calls for drastic changes or roll-backs of progressive initiatives. He was responding to the cries of a minority of well-connected residents who were irrationally furious about the change in their neighborhood, despite its many tangible and obvious benefits.
Even a cursory visit to see the cycletrack in action would have demonstrated its value, but he only bothered to do that after he'd made a huge issue of calling for it to be torn out, and only then because WABA went to him about reconsidering his ill-informed position. Not what we need in elected leaders.
I hope Ward 2 goes in a different direction than Evans.
by Will on Oct 27, 2011 11:42 am • link • report
I would be interested how the Council is preparing for the potential reduction in Federal funding that in large part sustains our economy. Will that be addressed through further reduction in services? Greater increases in revenue? Where will that revenue come from?
by DCster on Oct 27, 2011 12:01 pm • link • report
My statement from a couple of posts ago stands.
by Jasper on Oct 27, 2011 12:04 pm • link • report
by shaw guy on Oct 27, 2011 12:05 pm • link • report
god, david and ken - be a little more obvious......
by Left4Dead on Oct 27, 2011 12:05 pm • link • report
Fiona Grieg is a prospective candidate for DC Council in Ward 2.
A couple of thoughts:
Do parents making let's say, 100k combined income, mostly send their kids to DCPS or private schools? Conversely, is the practice of parents fleeing (postkids) as prevalent as it has been in years past?
Is the city's fiscal position really in a bad place? How do parks help that?
Forget the Councilmember, why is Natwar still there and why have DC residents not called for his head?
Also, voting for a specific candidate won't move us past the ethics scandals. Amending/implementing the current rules will likely work better. Talking about ethics (or lack thereof) is fun. Let's pass/enforce laws.
by HogWash on Oct 27, 2011 12:42 pm • link • report
Well presumably Ward 2 residents care about Ward 2's problems, and since Ward 2 residents are the ones choosing who is going to be the Ward 2 councilmember, then I would think bringing up Ward 2 problems is in fact quite germain.
Also, Ward 3 is much more wealthy than Ward 2, as a matter of average and median wealth/income. Ward 4 might be more wealthy than Ward 2 as well, but I'm not sure of that.
by TM on Oct 27, 2011 12:55 pm • link • report
This woman definitely isn't living in the same city I live in. Were it not for Jack Evans and his capable staff, it would be even harder to get the basics done around here.
An example in my case was my ordering of a new trash can and new recycling bin. I'd been alerted by neighbors that if I was going to replace my cracked can and broken bin that I'd better do it before the cut-off for no-charge replacements. (Which was something like Monday, April 25.) I put my order in on line on April 24th .... and then the wait began. I gave it 2 months and called 311 and was referred to the person responsible for delivering the new cans ... and told they'd just arrived at their warehouse and that I'd be getting mine 'within the week'. Well, another 4 weeks went by and I still hadn't gotten them. I called again and this time I was told that I 'have to wait my turn' ... with a side remark being that since I'd ordered before the cut-off date for free replacements, they'd fill mine only after they'd filled the paid requests. I waited a couple more months ... and decided to contact Jack Evans constituent services person for Ward 2, Andrew Huff ... This was on a weekday afternoon ... a Monday. The next morning my two new cans were sitting by my front door ... " Problem solved ... but only by calling Jack Evan's Office.
YES, the executive branch should get their act together and make the system work. But it doesn't. And until such time that it works we are fortunate to have a Councilmember like Jack Evans who knows that his constituents are looking for service and aren't looking for words.
Now if Fiona Greig really believes "DC agencies generally deliver the services that residents pay for with their taxes, she's either not lived here very long or maybe doesn't need to deal directly with the city on a daily basis. Although I don't know who anyone who owns a car in the District or has to deal with getting city services for their houses (including getting permits) wouldn't understand we still have a real problem here in terms of city services.
Maybe she thinks because we have a couple bike paths around that "DC agencies generally deliver the services that residents pay for with their taxes. I dunno, but I have to seriously question her capabilities for running for this office if she doesn't understand the problems.
by Lance on Oct 27, 2011 1:00 pm • link • report
What issues have you had with owning a car in the District? We have a car, and have actually been thrilled at the improvements (over 10 years, so I can't pin them to a specific Mayoral administration) in automating the license and registration renewal with online services. And even the inspection center in Southwest seems to operate much more smoothly than it used to. Same thing with online payment of parking tickets.
In 6+ years, we haven't come across a single issue.
So now you know "someone who owns a car in the District" who doesn't see any problem with those services.
Other agencies still have some issues, but we've actually gotten pretty decent responses from DPW as well, when we were dealing with recycling collection issues (stemming, I think from confusion about houses in our alley that have private trash collection vs. those that have public collection).
by Jacques on Oct 27, 2011 1:41 pm • link • report
by aaa on Oct 27, 2011 1:55 pm • link • report
by FoggyRez on Oct 27, 2011 2:05 pm • link • report
I think this says more about the dynamics of the race than two dozen debates or a thousand position papers ever could.
by oboe on Oct 27, 2011 2:09 pm • link • report
Overall my DMV experience hasn't been bad, but last time I went (on a Wednesday morning, not a typically busy time) I had to wait 45 minutes in line. Also, there seems to have been a policy change that allows employees to wear street clothes. That is unacceptable for taxpayer-facing jobs.
by Phil on Oct 27, 2011 3:05 pm • link • report
Now should the Councilmembers be having to use their resources to make up for the shortcomings of the executive branch? Of course not. But the point is that for someone to say that 'DC agencies generally deliver the services that residents pay for with their taxes' is more than a little worrisome. A good chunk of a councilmember's time is spent making up for the problems in the executive branch ... possibly the majority of it when you take into account oversight hearings and the like which usually turn out to be much more than just 'oversight'.
by Lance on Oct 27, 2011 3:51 pm • link • report
by Phil on Oct 27, 2011 4:05 pm • link • report
Nothing like waiting until the last minute and then wondering why things don't go smoothly...
by Marian Berry on Oct 27, 2011 4:14 pm • link • report
Constituency service is everything. That keeps you in office for a long, long time. Any evidence Jack is slacking?
by charlie on Oct 27, 2011 4:53 pm • link • report
Bingo. These are the sorts of issues that any councilmember (or Congressperson, for that matter) who cares even a little about being reelected stays on top of. Not sure why @Lance thinks Evans' eventual (hopefully soon) replacement would ignore these issues.
by oboe on Oct 27, 2011 4:54 pm • link • report
Evans has generally served Ward 2 well. He takes care of the constituent issues that keeps him in office. I suppose his staff is largely to thank for that.
In any case, it seems that Fiona has already peaked and said hardly a thing.
by Fred Phelps on Oct 27, 2011 8:11 pm • link • report
I never said she would ignore them, I said that by her own words:
""DC agencies generally deliver the services that residents pay for with their taxes"
it's obvious she doesn't understand the formidable obstacles the residents of this city face on a daily basis when trying to navigate the bloated and inefficient bureaucracy we call 'City Hall'.
In or
by Lance on Oct 27, 2011 10:46 pm • link • report
by Lance on Oct 27, 2011 10:51 pm • link • report
by Rich on Oct 27, 2011 11:09 pm • link • report
On could just as easily (and in fewer characters) call this candidate Fiona, or Grieg, just as we call "that man she's running against" Jack, or Evans.
by David Alpert on Oct 28, 2011 8:54 am • link • report
On a substantive note, as a parent (not in Ward 2, obviously) I agree 1000% about schools, parks, and walkable communities. If you can convince voters you can deliver on these priorities, you will be a shoo-in. The problem is that the incumbent is very powerful and can deliver. It's just that he'll probably deliver more reliably for developers than for parents/homeowners.
Not trying to discourage her, but Evans is a good politician. This is an uphill battle. Just ask Councilmember Weaver.
by Ward 1 Guy on Oct 28, 2011 9:14 am • link • report
by Jasper on Oct 28, 2011 10:09 am • link • report
Retaining families is a city issue and very much a Ward 2 issue. Wards 5 & 6 have made a great deal of progress over the past year and a half and others need to learn from them and follow suite. Like his kids, I attended private schools in the 80's and 90's. That was the 'only option' he and my parents saw for us (and for those that don't know, he was a single dad of three for numerous years before his recent marriage. He did his best as a fulltime single parent as any parent would). But my kids are DCPS students and I'm not backing down on holding anyone accountable. I live in Ward 2 because I'm fortunate that I live in the house I grew up in. I can't afford private schools and I refuse to look towards charters. I choose to invest in my community and the schools.
I offered to hold educational forums for Evans and Grieg in my house and invited a broad spectrum of people that included parents and non-parents (GGW included). As President of the Urban Neighborhood Alliance we have also offered to hold open forums on all topics to Evans and Greig (I met her last night and extended the offer).
People can argue all over the forums and infer the better candidate, or they can hold both accountable and start asking the hard questions at public venues. I see to many people in this city jump the gun without being well informed or researching the history of their neighborhoods and communities. Do you know who your ANC is? Do you know what they do? Do you know what your neighborhood was like 5, 10, 15 years ago? Do you know that Georgetown and Anacostia were at times the wealthiest African American neighborhoods in DC? Take a gues which was first before that population was forced to move out. See a parrallell in gentrification or the flee to the burbs for many ethnic groups?
Loyalities should lie with the best option in a candidate ready to lead in a progressive way to bring DC back to the rich city it once was decades ago. I welcome all to stop personal attacks on each other and direct the energies towards the questions that need to be asked.
* UNA is a newly formed group and our website is still under conctruction. If you would like to attend one of our open and public forums for Evans and (hopefully) Greig in January or February, please go to the following link for updates: http://www.unadc.org/una/Events_Get_Involved.html
by Lee Granados on Oct 28, 2011 12:04 pm • link • report
While I strongly believe that incumbents need to be challenged and should never run unopposed, I also think that candidates should not run just for the sake of running.
I don't question Ms. Greig's commitment to public service, but I find this "manifesto" to be shallow. If she is truly interested in making substantive changes, then running for At-Large would be a better venue. Ideally she ought to leave the cushy comfort of georgetown and move to ward 5 and unseat a truly unfit politician, but I realize that that is too much to ask.
by petardimmy on Oct 28, 2011 1:14 pm • link • report
He was the first Councilmember to call for a Mayoral takeover of the schools and was by far the strongest supporter of Michelle Rhee. The School Modernization Act, which we can thank for our recent renovations came directly from Evans. Bottom line is that he knows how to get things done and maneuver the DC bureaucracy. Greig most certainly does not.
Look up the voter records for 2008 and 2010. Ms. Greig, despite being a registered Dem in Georgetown, did not even vote! How is that for community involvement?
by William Folk on Oct 28, 2011 2:01 pm • link • report
Voting is so last century. Did she comment on blogs?
by charlie on Oct 28, 2011 2:10 pm • link • report
Has she commented under her own post?
by Jasper on Oct 28, 2011 3:22 pm • link • report
Evans has done neither despite plenty of opportunity. Over $100 million has gone missing from DC coffers under Evans' chairmanship of council's Finance and Revenue committee.
by LongTimeRez on Oct 28, 2011 4:43 pm • link • report
by fiona will lose if she supports campus plan on Oct 29, 2011 7:54 am • link • report
It would also be useful to hear if she had been meeting with a Councilmember's staffer and an employee of a non-profit group before she decided to run for the Ward 2 seat. Was that what motivated her to run for office since she's never played any previous role in the public sphere?
by Fritz on Oct 29, 2011 1:53 pm • link • report
What does that matter?
If Grieg truly has not voted in any election since she's lived in DC, that's really not good.
Are there relevant elections in DC then? Most go unopposed - even in the primaries. In the last election a council member got voted in by less than 2% of Washingtonians. Honestly, the Chinese even try to get people to show up for their single-option elections. In DC, even that goes too far.
by Jasper on Oct 30, 2011 10:09 pm • link • report
by Geoffrey Hatchard on Nov 1, 2011 6:51 am • link • report
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/looselips/2011/11/04/who-will-ward-2-candidate-fiona-greig-raise-money-from/
by ontarioroader on Nov 5, 2011 5:37 pm • link • report
by Sandra Brooks on Mar 20, 2012 10:48 am • link • report
Add a Comment