Greater Greater Washington

Politics


The Ward 4 council race is crowded. Will it be competitive?

The race to represent Ward 4 on the DC Council is shaping up to be a crowded one. Whether or not it will also be competitive remains to be seen. At least 7 candidates are vying to unseat councilmember Muriel Bowser, who is running for her second full term.


Photo by Wayan Vota on Flickr.

Bowser was first voted onto the council in a 2007 special election to fill the seat vacated by Adrian Fenty when he was elected Mayor. She secured Fenty's endorsement and beat out 18 other candidates with 40% of the vote. Ward 4 voters then elected her to a full term in 2008 with 75% of the Democratic primary and 97% of the general election vote.

Bowser currently chairs the Council's Committee on Government Operations as well as the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. She also recently took over as the DC Council's representative on the WMATA Board of Directors.

On her website, which has not been updated to reflect her current committee chairmanship, She highlights her work on Pepco oversight, healthcare, and foreclosure reform.

If fundraising is any indicator, Bowser will have a distinct advantage. She raised over $63,000 in advance of the October 10 filing deadline and has $140,000 on hand. She will face two challengers who have shown fundraising prowess, or the willingness to fund themselves, and several more who have run for the DC Council in the past.

Max Skolnik, a relative newcomer to Ward 4, has been active in local issues for some time. He represented the Southwest Waterfront as an ANC commissioner from 2004-2008 and runs Kid Power Inc., which operates academic, nutritional, and service learning programs around the city. His campaign is based on three E's: Education, Economic Development, and Ethics.

Skolnik is a first-time council candidate, but has shown some fundraising and organizing skill. He raised over $26,000 before October 10, recently testified in front of Bowser's committee hearing on ethics reform, and has hit the streets of Ward 4 to spread his message. The question is, will he have the energy and talent to present a robust challenge to the incumbent?

Renee Bowser (no relation to Muriel) first ran for the Ward 4 seat as a member of the Statehood Green Party in the 2007 special election. She registered as a Democrat this time around and has jump started her campaign by taking out significant loans, totaling more than $26,000.

Bowser has a long resume. She works as a union lawyer and served 3 terms as an ANC commissioner including a stint as the chair of ANC 4D. Her platform is based around economic development, education, constituent service, and statehood. She has proved willing to commit financially and gotten some press. Her challenge will be translating these efforts to support at the polls.

Another two-time candidate, Baruti Jahi, came in a distant second to Bowser in 2008. He is focused on seniors, public safety, education, economic development, and reigning in waste in city government. Jahi has struggled to raise money this cycle and may find it difficult to make his voice heard in a crowded race.

Several other candidates have declared their intentions to run. Judi Jones ran against Bowser as an independent in 2007, Keith Jarrell is just getting his campaign started, and perpetual candidate Calvin Gurley appears to be taking a non-traditional route to spread his message.

The major storylines in this race are beginning to emerge, as Muriel Bowser attempts to tackle the task of ethics reform, which has been the hot button issue this year. Her post as chair of the Government Operations Committee gives her the opportunity to make sense of the mess of bills introduced by other council members and propose comprehensive ethics legislation.

If she is able to pass an ethics reform bill, Bowser will blunt a major line of criticism as well as tout a signature piece of legislation. Her opponents have begun to position themselves as good government reformers, but will have to find another angle if Bowser herself becomes one before the election.

Bowser's opponents haven't focused all of their efforts on ethics. Other major issues at play appear to be education, economic development, and constituent service. But, Bowser is a proven politician with all the advantages of incumbency. If one of her opponents hopes to stand out they are going to have to work tirelessly, communicate effectively, and, probably, get lucky.

Matt Rumsey moved to D.C in 2005 to pursue a degree in History at American University. Originally from Connecticut, he has had no intention of leaving D.C. since he moved to Columbia Heights in the summer of 2008. He now lives in Ward 5. He currently works at The Sunlight Foundation. Views here are his own. 

Comments

Add a comment »

If one of her opponents hopes to stand out they are going to have to work tirelessly, communicate effectively, and, probably, get lucky.

A fair assessment.

by The Brightwoodian on Nov 14, 2011 1:05 pm • linkreport

Bowser likely will crush these people. They don't have the organizational heft to compete.

Effective with the 2007 special elections, Fenty and Gray successfully "reorganized" the ward electionspace in respective elections in W4 (Bowser) and W7 (Alexander) so that the campaigns couldn't really exist outside of the Growth Machine arena of real estate development dominated campaign financing.

I was hoping that Renee Bowser would have won the 2007 election to demonstrate the ability of a somewhat independent politics within the city political arena. It wasn't to happen. And I doubt it will this election cycle either.

Similarly, the crushing of the Republican candidate in the 2008 at large election, it shows that being outside of the traditional funding systems makes success very difficult. (The Republicans were too smart by half to dump Schwartz in favor of a more conservative candidate. That might have been their last hold on a council seat.)

And not having neighoborhood track records will doom the candidacy of people like Max, who hasn't done much of anything within the ward.

by Richard Layman on Nov 14, 2011 1:06 pm • linkreport

Damn, forgot to include this:

all the more reason to use ranked choice voting systems, plus to have maybe 2 councilmembers per ward.

http://www.acgov.org/rov/rcv/

by Richard Layman on Nov 14, 2011 1:08 pm • linkreport

I live in Ward #4 and will probably vote for Bowser. I think she has done a decent job here and has been relatively scandal-free. I do wish she could do something, though, in regard to that Triangle Park at 4th Street, Cedar Street, and Blair Road NW near the Takoma Metro Station. I also wish Georgia Avenue NW could have more upscale restaurants, but that should be forthcoming in the next 5-10 years.

by Rain17 on Nov 14, 2011 1:44 pm • linkreport

I fear that Richard is right. I will not be voting for Bowser - her constituent services are terrible, and she has done nothing about economic development. But her ability to raise funds, along with the fact that she's one of the only councilmembers not accused of serious ethics violations, likely means she will win.

Rain17 is right that development will come to Ward4. But it will be in spite of Bowser, not because of her.

by dchs on Nov 14, 2011 2:45 pm • linkreport

Muriel is the only serious candidate.

I haven't seen or heard from Max, Baruti, or Renee since I moved to Ward 4 in 2007. I've heard too much from Keith and Calvin - they're nut jobs.

Muriel has done well from my view. Could she have done better? We all could've. Yet she's doing good and doing it clean. That counts for a lot to me.

by Wayan on Nov 14, 2011 10:24 pm • linkreport

A long time ago, Keith was the chair of ANC6A, during its transition from really bad to great. He was at the tail end of the bad, trying to improve it, but without the vision and intellectual heft and consistency to make change. Change eventually came about in part by redistricting, and a group of people committed to making the change.

I agree with Wayan's assessment. Baruti is involved in various stuff around Brightwood, wrt the Walmart, Ward 4 Thrives, etc. Renee has been involved with Statehood-Green Party for some time.

But Muriel has the natural advantage of going to all the meetings she goes to (which are a lot), plus staff.

by Richard Layman on Nov 15, 2011 6:20 am • linkreport

The ethics review of the board of itself left a bad taste in my mouth. And to my understanding Ms. Bowser, at then end, fell into line so that these guys could keep their perks such as prime spaces at games, lavish cars, and trips with our money. If I see her stand up for eliminating these entitlement wastes I would do it in a heart beat. Till then I will look closely at the others.

by Ward4Res on Jan 6, 2012 2:24 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or