Public Spaces
Are abandoned newspaper boxes micro blight?
It's been just a few years since graffiti sprawled across Washington's downtown buildings. While blight in DC used to be large-scale, marked by graffiti and vacant lots, improvements over the past several years mean that in many places around the city, we now look for blight with a microscope. Are abandoned newspaper boxes blight on this micro scale?
The December 9 article on DC's lack of newsstands elicited strong reader reactions about what does and does not belong on our city streets. From upper Connecticut Avenue to K Street to around the Anacostia Metro station, newspaper boxes in Washington are ubiquitous. And abandoned boxes are often seen as a subtle sign of urban disorder.
Across the city, newspaper boxes cluster together in numbers easily reaching into the double digits in a single location. The clusters reflect the diversity of locally-available publications, ranging from the Epoch Times and Washington City Paper to USA Today, El Tiempo Latino, and the Washington Blade. As a means of distribution, newspaper boxes are critical to any publication. But when jumbled together haphazardly in nearly every corner of the city, are they adding to or detracting from the streetscape?
An unscientific canvas of downtown shows that boxes are distributed indiscriminately, sometimes on the corner while other times curbside in the middle of the street. Large concentrations are bunched outside most Metro stations. In upper Northwest and parts of Capitol Hill, they are frequently lined up outside of coffee shops. Elsewhere throughout the city, they hover near bus stops, frequently commandeered as additional ad hoc seating.
There are nearly 30 boxes outside of the Metro Center entrance at 12th & G. At least three metal boxes, Our Town, Falls Church Free Press, and the Rock Creek Free Press, appear to be abandoned. A quick check of Rock Creek Free Press's website confirms, "The September 2011 edition will be our last. After 5 years, 50 issues, the Rock Creek Free Press has printed its final edition." Their boxes outside of Metro Center and Gallery-Place entrances, however, remain.
Only one block down the street at the 13th & G Metro Center entrance, there are over 30 boxes, a dozen battered and vacant. From the looks of it, the box for Our Town is being used as makeshift storage locker for a homeless person's blanket, rather than newspapers.
Who is responsible for newspaper boxes?
Stocking or not stocking boxes is an independent decision by each publisher, but an inactive newspaper box has a similar effect on public space, albeit on a smaller scale, as that of a vacant storefront. In its own way, a vacant box is representative of physical and intellectual blight.
Earlier this year, Arl Now documented two of the usual suspects in vacant boxes: the publications Apartment Showcase and For Rent. In March, Prince of Petworth pondered who regulates boxes.
While DDOT's Public Space Policy Division has jurisdiction to regulate the abandoned boxes, removing the boxes from the streets clearly isn't very high on the city's priority list. "Just look around," said a man standing next to the line of boxes bordering the street at the 7th & F NW entrance to the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station.
Boxes at Metro stations fall under WMATA's jurisdiction, beyond DDOT's reach. If the buildup of years-derelict boxes outside many stations is any indication, Metro isn't clamoring to clear things out, either.
Vacant boxes in Anacostia
Although there are 5 boxes for The Washington Post and a solitary box for The Washington Times outside the Anacostia Metro, it has been weeks if not months, maybe a year or more, since they have been stocked, according to my independent observations and those of many morning commuters.
Up and down MLK and Good Hope Road, sometimes across the street from each other, are the omnipresent yellow stand-up boxes of The Express. The boxes are usually empty, with bundles of the paper instead resting on the front doorsteps of buildings around the neighborhood.
At 14th & Good Hope Road, outside of the Anacostia Warehouse Market, a Washington Post box is vacant and chained shut. "I don't know how long it's been there, but it's probably close to whenever the paper started," said Earl Johns, an Anacostia resident as he entered the market. As an indefinite indication of its age, the daily paper is priced at a quarter.
What to do about vacant boxes
Given their negative influence on the urban fabric, it is worthwhile to explore potential ways to address abandoned boxes. In other cities, people have gotten creative. There have been examples of boxes serving as flower pots> for guerrilla gardeners. Some have hosted small "parties"; others have featured benign street art dioramas.
In Boston, two friends launched an experiment in "direct reciprocity" by making one abandoned box a 24-hour dropbox that dictated, "1. Leave an item; 2. Take an Item; and 3. Don't be a Stranger." People have even suggested using old boxes as grills. In Toronto an arts organization, the 24 Hour Box Guerrilla Art Makeover Project, has taken up the cause of beautifying grimy boxes.On New York City's Upper East Side a long-standing community group has worked with the city for years to remove abandoned "newsracks" from cluttered sidewalks. In 2004, New York enacted a law revising existing regulations of newsracks. In DC, no such laws appear to be on the books, and if they are, they are not enforced.
While many communities in the city suffer from structural unemployment and smothering rates of illiteracy, it is understandable the dumping of newspaper boxes has been ignored.
Of course, some see the boxes as an important part of the landscape. According to one Howard University student, "They make the outside of the metro more colorful. Without the boxes you'd be bored."
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- PG planners propose bold new smart growth future
- Prince George's County struggles to get trails right
- Bikeshare and better health go together











by DowntownLawyer72 on Dec 15, 2011 2:43 pm • link • report
Wasn't always so. If I remember right,the primary recycling company in the area is owned by the Post.
by charlie on Dec 15, 2011 2:57 pm • link • report
If DC chooses not to ban them, then they should at least charge a fee (with a stamp or tag affixed to the box) for use of public space. (The fee can be modest, but given that WaPo customers have to pay sales tax at a newsstand or a drugstore, but the paper pockets the entire coinage at a box, it is certainly something that is feasible for newspaper boxes.) The problem, though, is not the Post or other paid newspapers -- it is the proliferation of the other boxes -- assigning a cost for the public space use would help to control their number and placement.
by Sarah on Dec 15, 2011 3:10 pm • link • report
by selxic on Dec 15, 2011 3:11 pm • link • report
by Donnie on Dec 15, 2011 3:19 pm • link • report
Do you not understand the difference between newsstands and news boxes?
by JustMe on Dec 15, 2011 3:24 pm • link • report
Require a permit to put a newspaper box on the street. I'm actually kind of shocked that this isn't already the case.
The permit should cost $250, broken out into a $50 administrative fee, and a $200 deposit that the city will return if you remove the box.
If you abandon the box, that extra $200 covers the cost of removing the thing.
You could establish some sort of system to determine if boxes are actually abandoned. I'd propose requiring the box owners to affix a new decal to the box on a yearly basis, similar to how car inspection/registration stickers work.
If your box doesn't have a current decal on it, it gets yoinked, and you lose the $200.
Also, I feel that BIDs should be allowed to purchase those multi-unit boxes that you see in other cities, and force newspapers within those jurisdiction to use them.
by andrew on Dec 15, 2011 3:28 pm • link • report
by MrTinDC on Dec 15, 2011 4:14 pm • link • report
The program did require a lot of coordination across the various newspaper publishers (i.e., not to sue the BID on 1st Amendment grounds).
I could not find the article about how the pilot went. I do not think that it is still in effect.
by Mitch Wander on Dec 15, 2011 4:23 pm • link • report
by Bossi on Dec 15, 2011 4:44 pm • link • report
by Doug on Dec 15, 2011 4:58 pm • link • report
by HogWash on Dec 15, 2011 5:19 pm • link • report
DC's outsized press diversity is a huge strength that helps grow our many diverse communities and increase our intellectual capital. We need to continue encouraging tiny publications to color our streets.
by MCX on Dec 16, 2011 3:40 am • link • report
by John Muller on Dec 16, 2011 4:26 am • link • report
What would happen if someone moved a box to a dumpster?
by Bloomingdale on Dec 16, 2011 6:37 am • link • report
Golden Triangle did condo boxes (Uniform look in one structure), however that is pricy and takes all the maintenance responsibility from the individual companies. I prefer corrals that group existing boxes together safely, preventing tipping over or being moved.
The are new regulations that came out, probably two years ago that specifically detail what to do with "hazardous and damaged" boxes. Hazards being places, like crosswalks, bus stops - those regulations were put out by DDOT. However, the process definitely favors the newspapers.
by Scott P on Dec 16, 2011 7:10 am • link • report
I rather value freedom of the press.
That said, a free permit renewable annually would be a start. If the permit isn't renewed then the city can remove the box. (Use a sticker to denote a valid permit)
by ah on Dec 16, 2011 8:16 am • link • report
by RE on Dec 16, 2011 8:17 am • link • report
by Sarah on Dec 16, 2011 9:27 am • link • report
by Challenger 3 on Dec 16, 2011 11:24 am • link • report
Thanks for getting rid of street junk.
BTW - these abandoned jersey barriers have been at this location for more than 15 years!!! (http://g.co/maps/kr7mu) They used to have a DDOT identifier on them, although that could have worn off by now. I worked in the building behind them from 1994-2003 and they were there the whole time.
I called the city once to see what could be done, and they claimed they were there for a reason. . .safety they claimed. Ha.
I was tempted to paint "FREE" on them to see if they would be taken away, but never got up the nerve.
There must be thousands of these kinds of neglected blight problems. Each one degrades the urban experience just a little, with the total effect being large.
Thanks for this post.
by Steve O on Dec 17, 2011 12:53 am • link • report
The box looks like (standard appearance criteria)
The box is place to avoid blocking pedestrian pathways
The box is never placed curb-side of a pedestrian pathway.
Violators will have their boxes removed and destroyed. No argument about fees, no repo-men required to shake down for fees, just black-and-white criteria.
No concern about "free" speech either - this wouldn't affect the box contents.
by S.R. Yaffe on Dec 18, 2011 4:29 pm • link • report
Add a Comment