Greater Greater Washington

Public Spaces


Are abandoned newspaper boxes micro blight?

It's been just a few years since graffiti sprawled across Washington's downtown buildings. While blight in DC used to be large-scale, marked by graffiti and vacant lots, improvements over the past several years mean that in many places around the city, we now look for blight with a microscope. Are abandoned newspaper boxes blight on this micro scale?


Newspaper boxes wrap the 12th & G Streets Metro Center entrance. Photo by author.

The December 9 article on DC's lack of newsstands elicited strong reader reactions about what does and does not belong on our city streets. From upper Connecticut Avenue to K Street to around the Anacostia Metro station, newspaper boxes in Washington are ubiquitous. And abandoned boxes are often seen as a subtle sign of urban disorder.

Across the city, newspaper boxes cluster together in numbers easily reaching into the double digits in a single location. The clusters reflect the diversity of locally-available publications, ranging from the Epoch Times and Washington City Paper to USA Today, El Tiempo Latino, and the Washington Blade. As a means of distribution, newspaper boxes are critical to any publication. But when jumbled together haphazardly in nearly every corner of the city, are they adding to or detracting from the streetscape?

An unscientific canvas of downtown shows that boxes are distributed indiscriminately, sometimes on the corner while other times curbside in the middle of the street. Large concentrations are bunched outside most Metro stations. In upper Northwest and parts of Capitol Hill, they are frequently lined up outside of coffee shops. Elsewhere throughout the city, they hover near bus stops, frequently commandeered as additional ad hoc seating.

There are nearly 30 boxes outside of the Metro Center entrance at 12th & G. At least three metal boxes, Our Town, Falls Church Free Press, and the Rock Creek Free Press, appear to be abandoned. A quick check of Rock Creek Free Press's website confirms, "The September 2011 edition will be our last. After 5 years, 50 issues, the Rock Creek Free Press has printed its final edition." Their boxes outside of Metro Center and Gallery-Place entrances, however, remain.


Photo by author.

Only one block down the street at the 13th & G Metro Center entrance, there are over 30 boxes, a dozen battered and vacant. From the looks of it, the box for Our Town is being used as makeshift storage locker for a homeless person's blanket, rather than newspapers.

Who is responsible for newspaper boxes?

Stocking or not stocking boxes is an independent decision by each publisher, but an inactive newspaper box has a similar effect on public space, albeit on a smaller scale, as that of a vacant storefront. In its own way, a vacant box is representative of physical and intellectual blight.

Earlier this year, Arl Now documented two of the usual suspects in vacant boxes: the publications Apartment Showcase and For Rent. In March, Prince of Petworth pondered who regulates boxes.

While DDOT's Public Space Policy Division has jurisdiction to regulate the abandoned boxes, removing the boxes from the streets clearly isn't very high on the city's priority list. "Just look around," said a man standing next to the line of boxes bordering the street at the 7th & F NW entrance to the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station.

Boxes at Metro stations fall under WMATA's jurisdiction, beyond DDOT's reach. If the buildup of years-derelict boxes outside many stations is any indication, Metro isn't clamoring to clear things out, either.

Vacant boxes in Anacostia


Old and vacant Washington Post box outside Anacostia Warehouse Market. Photo by author.

Although there are 5 boxes for The Washington Post and a solitary box for The Washington Times outside the Anacostia Metro, it has been weeks if not months, maybe a year or more, since they have been stocked, according to my independent observations and those of many morning commuters.

Up and down MLK and Good Hope Road, sometimes across the street from each other, are the omnipresent yellow stand-up boxes of The Express. The boxes are usually empty, with bundles of the paper instead resting on the front doorsteps of buildings around the neighborhood.

At 14th & Good Hope Road, outside of the Anacostia Warehouse Market, a Washington Post box is vacant and chained shut. "I don't know how long it's been there, but it's probably close to whenever the paper started," said Earl Johns, an Anacostia resident as he entered the market. As an indefinite indication of its age, the daily paper is priced at a quarter.

What to do about vacant boxes

Given their negative influence on the urban fabric, it is worthwhile to explore potential ways to address abandoned boxes. In other cities, people have gotten creative. There have been examples of boxes serving as flower pots for guerrilla gardeners. Some have hosted small "parties"; others have featured benign street art dioramas.


Courtesy of The Pop-Up City.
In Boston, two friends launched an experiment in "direct reciprocity" by making one abandoned box a 24-hour dropbox that dictated, "1. Leave an item; 2. Take an Item; and 3. Don't be a Stranger." People have even suggested using old boxes as grills. In Toronto an arts organization, the 24 Hour Box Guerrilla Art Makeover Project, has taken up the cause of beautifying grimy boxes.

On New York City's Upper East Side a long-standing community group has worked with the city for years to remove abandoned "newsracks" from cluttered sidewalks. In 2004, New York enacted a law revising existing regulations of newsracks. In DC, no such laws appear to be on the books, and if they are, they are not enforced.

While many communities in the city suffer from structural unemployment and smothering rates of illiteracy, it is understandable the dumping of newspaper boxes has been ignored.

Of course, some see the boxes as an important part of the landscape. According to one Howard University student, "They make the outside of the metro more colorful. Without the boxes you'd be bored."

John Muller is a local journalist and historian. His first book, Frederick Douglass in Washington, DC: The Lion of Anacostia, was published by The History Press last year. John is now at work on Mark Twain in Washington, DC.  

Comments

Add a comment »

Something does need to be done about this. But there are bigger issues like elected city officials bring indicted.

by DowntownLawyer72 on Dec 15, 2011 2:43 pm • linkreport

Much like the plastic bags the post uses, or the constant, never-ending junk newspaper advertising supplement they shove into my mailbox, newspaper companies are never called out on their environmental impact.

Wasn't always so. If I remember right,the primary recycling company in the area is owned by the Post.

by charlie on Dec 15, 2011 2:57 pm • linkreport

These boxes clutter and sometimes obscure public space. People don't value the "free" contents of boxes, so their contents are often dumped out and litter the public space. Some boxes are so poorly stocked/maintained that they function as trash containers.

If DC chooses not to ban them, then they should at least charge a fee (with a stamp or tag affixed to the box) for use of public space. (The fee can be modest, but given that WaPo customers have to pay sales tax at a newsstand or a drugstore, but the paper pockets the entire coinage at a box, it is certainly something that is feasible for newspaper boxes.) The problem, though, is not the Post or other paid newspapers -- it is the proliferation of the other boxes -- assigning a cost for the public space use would help to control their number and placement.

by Sarah on Dec 15, 2011 3:10 pm • linkreport

The boxes should be converted into sidewalk vending machines/food heat lamps operated by food truck owners.

by selxic on Dec 15, 2011 3:11 pm • linkreport

But... but.. but... but I thought that newsstands were needed to make DC a more lively and iconic place. Why not newspaper boxes? And we could really use more beeper dealers and fax cafes while we're at it!!

by Donnie on Dec 15, 2011 3:19 pm • linkreport

but I thought that newsstands were needed to make DC a more lively and iconic place.

Do you not understand the difference between newsstands and news boxes?

by JustMe on Dec 15, 2011 3:24 pm • linkreport

Here's an idea:

Require a permit to put a newspaper box on the street. I'm actually kind of shocked that this isn't already the case.

The permit should cost $250, broken out into a $50 administrative fee, and a $200 deposit that the city will return if you remove the box.

If you abandon the box, that extra $200 covers the cost of removing the thing.

You could establish some sort of system to determine if boxes are actually abandoned. I'd propose requiring the box owners to affix a new decal to the box on a yearly basis, similar to how car inspection/registration stickers work.

If your box doesn't have a current decal on it, it gets yoinked, and you lose the $200.

Also, I feel that BIDs should be allowed to purchase those multi-unit boxes that you see in other cities, and force newspapers within those jurisdiction to use them.

by andrew on Dec 15, 2011 3:28 pm • linkreport

Yes! Abandoned newspaper boxes (as well as rusty, beat up, poorly-maintained ones) ARE blight! They generally get stuffed with trash, knocked over, sprayed with graffiti, covered with stickers, and you can never get rid of them. They're nothing more than giant pieces of litter that are impossible for a good samaritan to easily remove. I usually pick up trash on the street and put it in the nearest receptacle, and I've even gone so far as to discard abandoned orange cones and half-empty sandbags from long-finished construction projects (Columbia Heights streetscape, anyone?) but just can't do anything about the abandoned newspaper boxes by the Metro station in Columbia Heights. This is a legitimate quality of life issue. Thank you to the author of this post for raising it!

by MrTinDC on Dec 15, 2011 4:14 pm • linkreport

There was a pilot program by the Georgetown Partnership (Business Improvement District) a few years back to provide standardized boxes in limited, specified locations. The intent was mostly to preserve finite sidewalk space for peds.

The program did require a lot of coordination across the various newspaper publishers (i.e., not to sue the BID on 1st Amendment grounds).

I could not find the article about how the pilot went. I do not think that it is still in effect.

by Mitch Wander on Dec 15, 2011 4:23 pm • linkreport

Wonder how much they're worth as scrap metal... perhaps send a message or two to the box's owner that they restore it & start using it again within so many days; otherwise it gets tagged with a bright official sticker that says it's free to whomever wants it. If experience serves me well from the college days: even the valueless plastic ones found homes in area dormitories.

by Bossi on Dec 15, 2011 4:44 pm • linkreport

If they bother you so much take a pair of bolt cutters down there, liberate the box, and deliver it to the nearest dumpster. I'm sure people have some way of dealing with them though or we'd have many many more abandoned ones than 2 or 3 amongst 20. Finding one from a paper that just closed down in September 2011 isn't all that alarming. It hardly seems like something the city council needs to waste it's time passing laws about. We don't need a law for every little thing. These machines have been around since the 1950s and society seems to have been able to function fairly well so far without these regulations. The way newspapers are going there probably won't be any at all left in 10 years anyway.

by Doug on Dec 15, 2011 4:58 pm • linkreport

@John, the boxes at Anacostia have been routinely empty for at least 2-3 years, and that's being modest.

by HogWash on Dec 15, 2011 5:19 pm • linkreport

I used to edit a community college newspaper. We were dying for some real newspaper boxes - those things are pricey. Ought to be a crime to throw them away or leave them to rot. If you know of a long-abandoned one, alert a grateful NOVA or MC.

DC's outsized press diversity is a huge strength that helps grow our many diverse communities and increase our intellectual capital. We need to continue encouraging tiny publications to color our streets.

by MCX on Dec 16, 2011 3:40 am • linkreport

@Hog, that's my guess, too. Thinking back to when I started to really notice the emptiness of Ana station's boxes was around summer/fall 2009. Maybe they've been stocked once or twice since then, but I really can't say for sure. Who really knows...

by John Muller on Dec 16, 2011 4:26 am • linkreport

Just curious if anyone has tried calling 311 and asking to have a specific box or boxes removed? Do they know who to send you to? Do they say there is a process similar to declaring a home vacant?

What would happen if someone moved a box to a dumpster?

by Bloomingdale on Dec 16, 2011 6:37 am • linkreport

Newspaper boxes, abandoned or not are a blight on the sidewalks that would benefit from regulatory reform, as the base rules haven't changed for decades.

Golden Triangle did condo boxes (Uniform look in one structure), however that is pricy and takes all the maintenance responsibility from the individual companies. I prefer corrals that group existing boxes together safely, preventing tipping over or being moved.

The are new regulations that came out, probably two years ago that specifically detail what to do with "hazardous and damaged" boxes. Hazards being places, like crosswalks, bus stops - those regulations were put out by DDOT. However, the process definitely favors the newspapers.

by Scott P on Dec 16, 2011 7:10 am • linkreport

Require a permit to put a newspaper box on the street. I'm actually kind of shocked that this isn't already the case.

I rather value freedom of the press.

That said, a free permit renewable annually would be a start. If the permit isn't renewed then the city can remove the box. (Use a sticker to denote a valid permit)

by ah on Dec 16, 2011 8:16 am • linkreport

@soctt p "Newspaper boxes, abandoned or not are a blight on the sidewalks" I'm with you there. It is not just abandoned ones, but I find boxes tipically obstructing the sidewalk, specially at street crossings, traffic light posts, bus stops and so on. If there is no regulation or permit needed to set one up, can I just pick one up and dump it at ft totten? Aren't they just street litter then?

by RE on Dec 16, 2011 8:17 am • linkreport

Andrew's proposal is a very good basis for addressing the problem. While I'm sensitive to First Amendment concerns, this doesn't mean free, unfettered access to obstruct and litter the public space, an ymore than it means a right to free access to a printing press, paper and ink. (And aren't most start-up, alternative papers on line, anyway?).

by Sarah on Dec 16, 2011 9:27 am • linkreport

Empty news boxes are sometimes used for quick storage of drugs and weapons. Furthermore, they crowd sidewalks making pedestrian traffic more difficult.

by Challenger 3 on Dec 16, 2011 11:24 am • linkreport

@MrTinDC

Thanks for getting rid of street junk.
BTW - these abandoned jersey barriers have been at this location for more than 15 years!!! (http://g.co/maps/kr7mu) They used to have a DDOT identifier on them, although that could have worn off by now. I worked in the building behind them from 1994-2003 and they were there the whole time.

I called the city once to see what could be done, and they claimed they were there for a reason. . .safety they claimed. Ha.

I was tempted to paint "FREE" on them to see if they would be taken away, but never got up the nerve.

There must be thousands of these kinds of neglected blight problems. Each one degrades the urban experience just a little, with the total effect being large.

Thanks for this post.

by Steve O on Dec 17, 2011 12:53 am • linkreport

Some communities have strict architectural standards so stringent that McDonalds has to operate without the golden arches. Why can't municipalities use that strategy for sidewalk furniture including newspaper boxes? Let the purveyors of such material do what they want so long as...
The box looks like (standard appearance criteria)
The box is place to avoid blocking pedestrian pathways
The box is never placed curb-side of a pedestrian pathway.
Violators will have their boxes removed and destroyed. No argument about fees, no repo-men required to shake down for fees, just black-and-white criteria.
No concern about "free" speech either - this wouldn't affect the box contents.

by S.R. Yaffe on Dec 18, 2011 4:29 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or