Greater Greater Washington

Public Spaces


"Obama hates BORF" buffed from the Red Line

The graffiti scrawls of "Cool 'Disco' Dan" and "Gangster Chronicles" have disappeared from along the Red Line, faded memories for a generation of riders. The mark of "Borf," a more recent omnipresent oppidan vandal, is now vanishing, too.


Photo by Eric Petersen.

First proclaiming in red paint "Bush Hates BORF" a half dozen years ago on a white wall facing the Metro tracks just yards south of Takoma Station, "Obama Hates BORF" in purple paint appeared soon after the 2008 presidential election. Coinciding with the start of 2012, the wall's proprietor buffed years worth of accumulated graffiti, including Borf's dictum.

If any Metro rides are feeling nostalgic, the owner of the uptown canvas, Vision Lighting, Inc., isn't. "That wall doesn't impact our business, it's just ugly from the Metro. The parts of our building that our customers see when they drive up Vine Street, we paint that on a regular basis as quickly as the weather allows us to after they've tagged us," says Kerwood Barnard, Jr., President of Vision Lighting, a manufacturer of energy-efficient light fixtures.

Still a streaming barrage of flashes, dashes, and splashes of colors and messages, the state of the Red Line's graffiti in 2012 is a shadow of its former self. The line has been a railroad, originally the Baltimore and Ohio, since the mid-19th century, and thus has long been an industrial corridor.


Graffiti-strewn buildings neighbor the Rhode Island Avenue Metro station. Photo by the author.

In recent years, the Metropolitan Branch Trail and development between Fort Totten and New York Avenue have brought new attention to the corridor's aesthetic appeal. Large-scale service projects have painted murals, as part of Murals DC, within sight of the Red Line. With Rhode Island Row's opening imminent, it is only a matter of time before the graffiti-strewn warehouses on the opposite side of Rhode Island Avenue NE are cleaned up.

Ownership of public spaces that enclose the Red Line is scattered between CSX (which owns the outer tracks used by MARC, Amtrak, and freight trains), WMATA, and mostly private businesses. The DC Department of Public Works' jurisdiction is limited to graffiti visible from the street.

"In FY 11 we spent approximately $500,000 on graffiti abatement, which is consistent with what we have spent in the past," said Nancee Lyons, spokesperson for DPW. "Last year, we completed 6,155 abatements on public and private space. Just to give you some perspective, we have five dedicated folks dealing with graffiti, one fewer than in the past."

Barnard, who has owned the business for 23 years, doesn't expect the wall's bareness to endure. "The building is so popular that the police have done midnight surveillance." However, the inevitability that another name will the grab the imagination of Red Line riders doesn't interest Barnard. "It's nothing but vandalism. They might as well come here and smash our windows. It costs us money all the time. It ruins the community. What's the message?"

Passing the now-almost-bare wall on a Shady Grove-bound train.
John Muller is a local journalist and historian. His first book, Frederick Douglass in Washington, DC: The Lion of Anacostia, was published by The History Press last year. John is now at work on Mark Twain in Washington, DC.  

Comments

Add a comment »

"It's nothing but vandalism. They might as well come here and smash our windows. It costs us money all the time. It ruins the community. What's the message?"

I agree 100%

by MrTinDC on Feb 8, 2012 2:11 pm • linkreport

Nice article...we need some more retrospectives of DC graffiti on these websites...always an interesting read!

by Phil on Feb 8, 2012 2:12 pm • linkreport

Funny, in GGW-world it is OK to paint graffiti on other people's property, but if you don't shovel your sidewalk --- off with your head.

by charlie on Feb 8, 2012 2:28 pm • linkreport

Speak for yourself, charlie. I doubt many GGW readers are anywhere near okay with graffiti.

by jag on Feb 8, 2012 2:30 pm • linkreport

I'm with Obama/Bush on this one. I hate BORF too (and the other vandals). They're not exactly Banksy.

by Falls Church on Feb 8, 2012 2:31 pm • linkreport

@charlie:
Could you point out where in the article it says it's okay to paint graffiti?

by Matt Johnson on Feb 8, 2012 2:32 pm • linkreport

This is one of those issues that I simply can't bring myself to get worked up over....

If we want to complain about eyesores, let's talk about the abandoned industrial buildings by the traintracks instead of the graffiti that's painted on them.

by andrew on Feb 8, 2012 3:25 pm • linkreport

I live along the Red Line near the Uline Arena, which if I'm not mistaken is serving primarily as a parking garage. There is graffiti on the arena, but I'm more put off by the billboards that Douglas Development Corp still has illegally hung on the side of the building.

They just tore down a couple of other billboards at NY and Florida, as well. Frankly I think that the billboards are a much larger affront to the aesthetic quality of the Red Line area.

And I certainly don't endorse graffiti; I certainly would like to see the Red Line cleaned up. But I would definitely admit that it has a cultural place in the city. I'll never forget counting how many "Cool Disco Dan" tags I saw taking the Red Line to my doctor's office as a kid. But if that cultural attribute of the city is to be retained, it should be through sanction murals, not vandalism.

by Dave Murphy on Feb 8, 2012 3:40 pm • linkreport

This is one of those issues that I simply can't bring myself to get worked up over....

If we want to complain about eyesores,

Graffiti isn't about eyesores. It's about the "broken window" theory of crime prevention.

If you're not familiar with that theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory

by Falls Church on Feb 8, 2012 4:04 pm • linkreport

Dave: Regarding those billboards on the Uline, I reported last year that DCRA had fined Douglas Development and told them to take the signs down.

I've been following up with DCRA occasionally on this topic, and it appears that the entire process has been dragged into a bureaucratic black hole by Douglas. I'd put the odds of the billboards actually coming down (and Douglas actually following the law) at near zero, unfortunately.

by Geoffrey Hatchard on Feb 8, 2012 9:31 pm • linkreport

Did they get rid of "Crotch Rot USA," which you used to be able to see from Blair Road north of Kansas Ave? I haven't been down there in a while. I remember a nice F*** the Police nicely displayed across from the Catholic U. dorms, too. Ah, riding on the Metro....

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rolenz/4298351927/

by Gary on Feb 8, 2012 11:23 pm • linkreport

I endorse graffiti I think it's great. I can't believe we waste $500,000 a year to destroy free public art. It'd be one thing if it was some nice architecture being vandalized or someones house, but these are the backs of warehouses. Usually just plain brick and cement walls, I think the graffiti enhances them. Gives the city character.

by Doug on Feb 9, 2012 12:42 am • linkreport

DOUG'S GOT THE RIGHT IDEA!

by BORF HATES YOU on Feb 9, 2012 3:53 pm • linkreport

YAY DOUG! Broken Window theory.....pffffft what a croc [deleted for violating the comment policy].
Cant stop wont stop. They can try though. Or you could focus that money towards something far more beneficial.....? Understandable to an extent, but abandoned broken down buildings? Come on now. If you don't like it don't look at it. Graffiti is part of urban culture in case some of you haven't been around for the past five decades.

by maketimecount on Feb 10, 2012 2:19 am • linkreport

Some graffiti is cool and has character, and if it's on an industrial building abutting a rail line, who cares?

Other graffiti is some moron with a spray can tagging a public mural or on the side of someone's house. Not cool.

"Obama Hates BORF" is somewhere in the middle. Not sure what I think of it. It sure isn't very artistic.

by MLD on Feb 10, 2012 8:18 am • linkreport

As some of the other commenters have alluded, it's difficult to define what makes some graffiti good and some not. I think it's a combination of location, content, and artistic-ness. The Brookland-CUA station has some interesting stuff - there is a Michael Jackson tribute, and some cartoon cats that I like. But the giant "F*CK THE POLICE" tag that appeared on a warehouse near Fort Totten (I think) a few months ago - not so much. I also get upset when I see graffiti covering public murals - I mean, have some respect. Seriously.

Anyway, I am inclined to agree with Doug - some graffiti is ugly and offensive, but overall, I think the cops and the city have much better things to do.

by Rebecca on Feb 10, 2012 10:54 am • linkreport

Having grown up in a rural area free from the burden of graffiti, I much prefer the graffiti. I think it's unfortunate that the proprietor says he'd rather the vandals smash their windows, since that's the preferred method of vandalism in rural areas and we always say at least graffiti might catch the eye.

The commissioned murals look stupid. The one just outside Takoma station looks stupid. The environment. It's important. It oughta be preserved. Cool. Graffiti with a message. Awesome. Interesting. Stupid.

Maybe I'm just some stupid country bumpkin but I liked the graffiti and don't know why they painted over the good ones when they're only going to be replaced with crumby ones.

Whitewash Brookland, #### SEAN TAYLOR + TOP CAT

by Toonces on Feb 10, 2012 7:31 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or