Government
Stepping it up for America
Over in the other Washington, DC, the one that's a curse on the lips of every politician running on a platform of change, advocacy groups on both sides of the transportation issue are gearing up for a fight that will determine the future shape of our settlement patterns, our future impact on the environment, and the success of our cities and towns: the mega transportation spending bill.
Streetsblog covered the launch yesterday of Build for America, a plan to revitalize our economy through investment in the transportation infrastructure we need now and will need in the future. And that doesn't mean new roads highways freeways expensive high-speed sprawl-inducing auto-only infrastructure, but greener transit that saves Americans from dependence on foreign oil and spending most of their income on gas.
At yesterday's press conference in New York, Representative Jerrrold Nadler, who represents most of the West Side of Manhattan and sits on the Transportation Committee, said, "If we do it right, it will help us get out of the very deep recession we're going into. If we don't do it right, it will make the recession deeper and reduce our competitiveness."
Right now, the nation's attention is riveted on McCain-Obama and Congressional races. Those will have an enormous impact on transportation Still, once the election is over, the hard work will begin for the Transportation for America coalition, which according to Roll Call will spend $4 million on the campaign. Five-point plans, press conferences and a Web site are a good start, but we'll need more to beat the power of the highway lobby.
We'll need a broad-based movement comprising citizens, bloggers, celebrities, economists, columnists, community organizers, unions, businesses, local governments, and more. Once Americans' and our elected officials' attention turns from the election to the harder work of governing, we'll need that movement to break through the clutter of bad proposals that throw money at bailing out unsustainable development patterns. T4America has the money and the right ideas. Hopefully they can mobilize the nation to pull off a real change in our transportation spending priorities.
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- PG planners propose bold new smart growth future
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Prince George's County struggles to get trails right







I believe they mean no new highways.
Comming from and referring to Washington DC and New York, that of course has no credibility.
Some very powerful people must hate the highways, particularly Jesuit run Georgetown and of course Catholic University of America.
http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/search/label/highway%20routing%20mysteries
http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2007/02/sampling-of-attitudes-towards-dc-i-95.html
On the flip side, I am favorably impressed with the California hi speed rail initiative.
http://goodspeedupdate.com/2008/2262
I would love to see that along the eastern coast, contrary to what REASON magazine (which I often agree with) writes.
by Douglas Willinger on Oct 16, 2008 12:55 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Oct 16, 2008 12:58 pm • link • report
Since this is a campaign about a federal bill, "roads" in this case refers to federally supported thoroughfares.
Slightly OT: Apparently the legal definition of "highway" includes all thoroughfares, and most parking lots too. Researchers use "highway" to mean all thoroughfares. Meanwhile the popular term for all vehicular thoroughfares is "road." Gotta love lawyers and traffic engineers.
by Laurence Aurbach on Oct 16, 2008 1:37 pm • link • report
Interesting the Feds were making these claims at the same time they introduced the use of the terms "highway" and "city" with regard to fuel economy figures.
Instead of "highways" I should have said "freeways" (as defied as free of at grade crossings).
by Douglas Willinger on Oct 16, 2008 1:46 pm • link • report
I think the Congress is fatally flawed on these issues. One needs only to see the acres of parking lots around the House and Senate (despite the close proximity of many transit modes) to see how our lawmakers think you ought to get from point A to point B.
Frankly it makes me ill to think of all the do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do laws they propose, while doing nothing to discourage the bad practices of their own employees.
by Reid on Oct 16, 2008 2:12 pm • link • report
I-66 tunnel beneath K Street?
I-395 tunnel extension along Catholic University of America?
NYC Westway?
NYC Canal Street Bypass Tunnel?
Midtown Manhattan Express Tunnel?
New Haven Route 34 Freeway Tunnel to Derby Street?
What is her list of such projects?
by Douglas Willinger on Oct 16, 2008 2:23 pm • link • report
http://cos-mobile.blogspot.com/2007/11/build-cross-brooklyn-tunnel_02.html
http://cos-mobile.blogspot.com/2007/12/build-cross-sound-tunnel.html
Where is Nancy Pelosi on any of these, and for that matter the hi speed rail proposal for California (and for the east coast)?
by Douglas Willinger on Oct 16, 2008 2:27 pm • link • report
by Lou DC on Oct 20, 2008 10:16 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Oct 21, 2008 8:50 am • link • report
Add a Comment