Greater Greater Washington. The Washington, DC area is great. But it could be greater.

Development


Wheaton developer builds small, but thinks big

While County Executive Ike Leggett wants to give developer B.F. Saul $40 million of public funds to build on public land in downtown Wheaton, one developer's been building here with minimal help from Montgomery County for decades.


Buildings developed by Greenberg in downtown Bethesda.

His name is Leonard Greenberg, and since the mid-1980's, his company Greenhill Capital has acquired nearly a third of downtown Wheaton, waiting for a real estate boom. When it passed him by, he decided to keep waiting while hatching bigger and grander schemes for the area.

“A believer in ‘city’”

I haven't always been kind to Greenberg's work, but after having a lengthy phone call with him earlier this week, I think it's time to offer his side of the story.

Greenberg grew up in the DC area, living briefly in Wheaton during the 1950's. After working for a Boston-based real estate investment firm on their D.C.-area projects, he struck out on his own and founded Greenhill Capital in 1974. In the 1980's, he's began buying and developing properties in Wheaton, anticipating the opening of a new Metro station.

"It was the last [central business district] that was scheduled to be developed" after Silver Spring, Bethesda and Friendship Heights, says Greenberg. "Plus, it was human scale. And there's something about the small proprietors."

MetroPointe
New apartments like these on Georgia Avenue, says Greenberg, will help local businesses in Wheaton.

Most of Greenberg's properties in Wheaton are single-story retail buildings, many of which were designed by Rockville architect Steven Karr. But he's always itched to do something greater. As he told the Gazette last week, Greenberg sees Wheaton as the next Adams Morgan, a vibrant hub for entertainment, shopping and culture. Not only that, but he knows how to do it.

"I'm a johnny-one-note. I've been saying this for 25 years, to get people on the street. I'm an urbophile. I'm a believer in 'city.' I get it."

If Greenberg had his way, he'd change liquor licenses to allow up to 75% of a venue's total sales to be alcohol, drawing bars and clubs. He wants a "county sponsored lease plan and economic program" to fill empty stores with theatres, artists and even university ventures. And he would've made sure that businesses displaced by redevelopment stayed in the area, unlike Barry's Magic Shop, which was condemned by the county to build a pedestrian walkway and received $260,000 to move to Rockville.

Finally, Greenberg would build lots of housing, both downtown and in surrounding neighborhoods, to create more foot traffic that can support local businesses. He's not convinced that B.F. Saul's plan to build offices over the Wheaton Metro will pencil out. "It costs as much to build in Wheaton as it does in Friendship Heights, but the rent multiplier is significantly higher," he explains.

In other words, tenants will pay more for an office in Friendship Heights than in Wheaton, no matter how nice it is. Meanwhile, rents for apartments in Wheaton are the same as those elsewhere in the county. "The county will have to heavily subsidize that office building," Greenberg told me on Monday, two days before Leggett's announcement.

After our talk, I e-mail Greenberg to ask what he thought about the $40 million subsidy B.F. Saul could receive. "Development would have occurred in Wheaton with bolder (even traditional urban) planning, but the county was too lazy and too anti-business for change to naturally evolve," he replies. "We never considered a [government] subsidy ... on any of our other projects."

“We're not apologizing”

Sidewalk, Triangle Park
Triangle Park, a shopping center developed by Greenhill, shown in 2010 before being leased.

According to Greenberg, any attempts to take Wheaton beyond the strip mall have been stifled by local opposition and red tape. "Boy, do I try to do more and better there," says Greenberg, "and you cannot imagine the resistance we have."

In 1990, the county passed a plan for downtown Wheaton that instituted a "Retail Overlay Preservation District." The district was supposed to protect small businesses while ensuring that new construction was of high quality. However, by limiting the density of new development and requiring that all new buildings be reviewed by the Planning Board, even ones that complied with the zoning code, it actually repelled investment.

"I absolutely abhor what the county has been doing all these years" in Wheaton, says Greenberg. "What they needed to do is have more density, more people to walk and support the urban core."

Upon buying the Anchor Inn restaurant at Georgia Avenue and University Boulevard in 2004, Greenberg envisioned redeveloping it with new housing and shops. It was the height of the real estate boom, when new apartments and townhouses were being built at the edges of downtown Wheaton. However, his proposal to build a 600,000 square feet mixed-use development on the site went nowhere because the county took too long to finish a new plan for the downtown, which was finally approved last year. "They wouldn't repeal the overlay district" in time, he grumbles.

In a Gazette article from 2006, Greenberg lamented that Wheaton "missed the train" on the economic boom. Instead, he built what zoning allowed: the smaller Georgia Crossing project, a series of one-story retail buildings that one resident called underwhelming.

"In the 1950's and 60's, Montgomery County was the standard by which suburbia was to be developed," Greenberg says. "The Wedges and Corridors [Plan], blah blah blah. But as we became more urbanized, they . . . tried to impose suburban standards on urban locations, without consideration to alleys and deliveries and urban edge and human scale, doors at the urban edge and creating a liveliness that was required."

That said, Greenberg isn't doing terribly well in Wheaton. He calls me out for using the above photo of Triangle Park, a shopping center at the intersection of Ennalls Avenue and Veirs Mill that he rebuilt after a large fire in 2008. The photo was taken in 2010 and shows the complex when it was new and empty. "That space has been leased for 18 months," says Greenberg. "We're getting mid-$30's [the leasing rate per square foot] and the parking lot is always full."

Not all of his tenants have been happy, though. In 2010, several disgruntled former tenants complained to the Gazette of broken contracts and unfairly high rents. One of those tenants was Eddie Velasquez, whose DeJaBel Café at Georgia Crossing opened in 2008 and closed 14 months later. Greenberg says it's simple why DeJaBel closed.

"If you owned a coffee shop, when would you open?" he asks me. "I guess 6 or 7 am, for people going on their way to work," I say.

"He opened at 9," Greenberg replies. Nonetheless, Greenhill got Velasquez a liquor license so the cafe could stay open at night, but even that wasn't enough to keep them in business. Cavan Wilk, suggests that it was a lack of foot traffic that killed DeJaBel Café, which wouldn't have been a problem if Greenberg had been able to build apartments on top.

"We're not apologizing" for the work Greenhill does, Greenberg says. "Think about the jobs we've created. We start people in businesses and we keep people in business."

“No one asked me to do it”

Where Haagen-Dazs Used to Be, Woodmont Avenue, Bethesda
Greenhill Capital developed this office and retail building in downtown Bethesda, shown in 2009.

One place where Greenberg sees the county doing something right is in downtown Bethesda, where Greenhill Capital's headquarters are located. The difficulty of doing business elsewhere in the county, whether it's Wheaton's retail overlay district or limits on procuring liquor licenses, sends people here, Greenberg says.

Not surprisingly, the handful of projects Greenhill has built here are much better than those in Wheaton: buildings close to the street, a mix of uses, and little aesthetic flourishes here and there. And no parking lots.

On Cordell Avenue, a pizzeria he developed features trompe l'oeil, or an optical illusion of fountains along the sidewalk. "No one asked me to do it," Greenberg says. "I did it." Over at Woodmont Avenue and Elm Street is what Greenberg calls "the Haagen-Dazs building" after its former ground-floor tenant, which has since moved down the street. The building remains a nice, and fully-occupied, piece of urbanism: it's a mix of retail and office space, has lots of windows facing the street, and a little plaza in front that is occasionally used for concerts.

Then there's the Edgemoor, shown at the top of the post, a complex of condominiums and townhomes on Montgomery Lane that was developed by Greenberg and built by three local builders. He rattles off a list of high-end features: "Real copper gutters and downspouts, slate roofs on the end units, oak doors," he says. "And until they screwed it up, Georgian gardens. I had these really nice Georgian gardens, but they took out all of the benches." Greenberg also lives in the high-rise building, which looks like an old-school New York apartment house.

"I wanted something between the Dakota and the Plaza," he says.

Yet these accomplishments generally go unnoticed east of Rock Creek Park, where Greenberg's reputation (including on this blog) is as an unscrupulous landlord and purveyor of strip malls. "Nobody talks about the stuff that we've given or the contributions we've made," he says. "To put your name on the line for a construction project is far different than throwing spitballs at it."

As a result, Greenberg is content to wait. "We got so frustrated with the process [in Wheaton] that we said we'll go forward and we'll wait for the next generation to take it to the next level," he says. "We are constrained by a non-business friendly environment, and Montgomery County's paid the price for that. Developers are not willing to take the risk."

And they'll sit on their substantial holdings in Wheaton until everyone else comes around. "We have enough ground for 1.5 million square feet" of development under current zoning, he says. "We're interested in the right kind of deal. We're not interested in selling."

He adds, "We'll see if Wheaton's time is now."

Dan Reed writes about planning issues in eastern Montgomery County and is interested in how people, especially young people, experience the urban realm. He grew up in Silver Spring and earned a double degree in Architecture and English at the University of Maryland. Dan is currently studying city planning at the University of Pennsylvania and lives in West Philadelphia. Since 2006, Dan has written his own blog, Just Up the Pike, about eastern Montgomery County. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Maybe Greenberg can take his plans and continue the (mostly) stalled development surrounding the Prince George's Plaza / "Mall at Prince George's" area. This region lacks many of the small businesses you'd find in Wheaton, but instead offers a Metro station surrounded by a few million square feet of big box retail and office space, dating back to the 1960s.

by Scott on Jan 20, 2012 1:00 pm  (link)

The two Greenhill projects in Bethesda you highlight happen to be the nicest Greenhill properties by far. It's not only east of Rock Creek where Greenhill scoops up properties to sit on while other developers do the heavy lifting. Look at some of their other properties in Bethesda. Greenhill just finished building a typical cinderblock example of disposable architecture next door to what will be a new high rise in Woodmont Triangle.

And if it is, as Mr Greenberg says, that the county keeps him from building anything of substance in Wheaton then how to explain the new Safeway project, the First Baptist Church project, and the Lowe Enterprises Computer Building retrofit?

As in that 2006 Gazette article you reference, Mr Greenberg tips his hand when he casually says, "we'll wait for the next generation." This is his M.O. And maybe this business model of buying up properties and waiting for development to happen around them is a necessary piece of the commercial property food chain - I don't fault anybody for making money if they play by the rules - but Mr Greenberg is disingenuous when he laments what he would build if only the county, the community, or the economy weren't standing in his way. Others are doing it in Wheaton right now – why isn't he?

by Dave in Wheaton on Jan 20, 2012 1:14 pm  (link)

B.F. Saul....wait for it..."The Other Guys"

by Fischy (Ed F.) on Jan 20, 2012 1:32 pm  (link)

After the ripping Greenberg took in the last piece, especially in the comments, this piece was probably due, to give a more balanced perspective. It owuld be nice, though, if the balance was struck in the piece. As for the office space question, what Greenberg isn't getting is that Wheaton offers a different market than Friendship Heights, but it offers a market nonetheless. Is the multiplier higher in Friendship? Surely so -- but I imagine the property valuation and taxes will capture some of that. It's not fair to say it costs the same to develop in Wheaton. It will be cheaper.

There are also a lot of businesses that would rather locate in Wheaton -- in part because of lower rents, but also because they will serve a different clientele and they also simply prefer the shopping and dining options in Wheaton.

by Fischy (Ed F.) on Jan 20, 2012 1:40 pm  (link)

Dan, maybe you should send this article to Rollin Stanley or Han Reimer in the county government

by mike on Jan 20, 2012 2:19 pm  (link)

@Dave in Wheaton

Almost all of the new construction that's taken place in Wheaton over the past ten years, and almost everything that's been proposed for the coming years, has been outside of the former Retail Preservation Overlay District, which restricted density while requiring extra site plan review. Naturally, that discouraged development. Check out this map:


View wheaton retail preservation overlay district in a larger map

Meanwhile, most of Greenberg's properties in Wheaton are inside the district, which was enacted in 1990. This is a map showing Greenhill projects designed by architect Steven Karr (who does most of Greenhill's designs):


View steven j. karr: east county's "town architect" in a larger map

So new development is happening in Wheaton, it's just avoiding the areas where new development is made more difficult.

by dan reed! on Jan 20, 2012 2:25 pm  (link)

What happened on the Anchor Inn property typifies everything that's wrong with suburban land use regulation. The development we want can only be built with special permission, but the development we don't want can be built "of right." The procedures for special permission are designed with only the ritziest neighborhoods in mind and are difficult and expensive, so development with lower rents is forced into the format we don't want. I happen to think that given land zoned for strip malls only (given the parking requirements, and the achievable rents in Wheaton) the strip mall that was built on the Anchor Inn property is actually about as good an urban design as was possible.

On the other hand, I have problems with several other Greenhill properties. The Haagen-Dazs building walls its retail off from the street behind fences. There is a strip mall near White Flint Metro where pedestrians approaching from the Metro are forced to walk a few feet on a dirt track - not a big deal, but putting down ten feet of concrete sidewalk is no big deal either.

by Ben Ross on Jan 20, 2012 2:40 pm  (link)

Wait a minute...

This guy buys and banks RE "waiting for a boom", then when DC has the largest real estate boom in its entire history, he "misses it"

"When it passed him by, he decided to keep waiting while hatching bigger and grander schemes for the area."

Why is this guy someone to admire when folks like Douglas Development get so much crap from the blogosphere for doing the "same.exact.thing.". Atleast Douglas isn't as inept as this guy seems to be by admittedly allowing a "boom" to go by and redevelops his portfolio when market economics allow.

by freely on Jan 20, 2012 3:00 pm  (link)

Someday, perhaps, Wheaton will be recognized for having the best suburban fake downtown.

by The Civic Center on Jan 20, 2012 3:25 pm  (link)

@Dan
Point taken. But the Retail Preservation Overlay District will soon be gone, so the proof will be in the pudding going forward. I'd be interested to hear his opinion of the new Sector Plan.

I am very glad to hear Mr Greenberg say he is a believer in city and an urbophile. And I'm really happy to hear he wants to do bigger things in Wheaton considering how much of it he owns. I think I mostly share the vision he describes for downtown. But, when he tells the Gazette that Wheaton will be up to his grandchildren to figure out and, in your interview, that "we'll wait for the next generation" – as a resident it really rubs me the wrong way.

With the Overlay gone, if any of those Greenhill strip malls get replaced with new vibrant, denser, mixed-use developments I will gladly eat my words.

by Dave in Wheaton on Jan 20, 2012 3:31 pm  (link)

As a former resident of Wheaton, I second Dave in Wheaton's words. I'll happily criticize Mr. Greenberg's work there. It was good hearing his side of the story. He does make excellent points about the poorly thought out retail overlay zone in the 1990 Sector Plan and how it affected his abilility to build better buildings.

If he sticks to everything he says, keep your eyes on Wheaton for when the new Sector Plan takes effect. It'll be the next real estate hot spot and our next vibrant downtown. I hope he's honest about his views for Wheaton. The area could really use it.

by Cavan on Jan 20, 2012 4:06 pm  (link)

Whether Mr. Greenberg really believes in this "grand scheme" will be seen in whether he cooperates with the upcoming development effort in Glenmont. Residents are sick of looking at that commercial slum known as the Glenmont Shopping Center (at Randolph and GA), and planners are rewriting the sector plan to focus on revamping that area. Greenberg owns property there and, in past years, has stood in the way of making any improvements (all property owners have to agree before anything can be done to that strip). Planners are now looking at rehabilitating the strip as a mixed-use development, which seems to be what Greenberg wants. I'm just hoping he doesn't demand outrageous densities and 20-story buildings...our roads still need to be able to support the traffic from a larger population.

by akb79 on Feb 5, 2012 10:54 pm  (link)

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.

Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)

or see below to post

To post your comment, please enter the two words in the box below to prevent spam:

Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time