Parking
H Street getting performance parking in March
Parking on H Street NE will continue costing 75¢ per hour from 7 am to 6:30 pm but increase to $2 per hour until 10 pm, under a performance parking program DDOT plans to launch in March.
Damon Harvey, DDOT's parking operations manager, and Councilmember Tommy Wells are co-hosting a meeting tonight to discuss the plan. It's 6:30-8 pm at Sherwood Rec Center, 640 10th Street, NE.
According DDOT's report, drivers will be allowed to park during the day for up to 2 hours, but there will be no time limit after 6:30. In addition, as at other performance parking zones, new restrictions will limit one side of surrounding streets, from G to I Street, 3rd to 15th, to drivers with Zone 6 parking stickers only.
Adjust rates regularly
The most important element of making any performance parking zone succeed is actually adjusting the meter rates up or down depending on demand. It took some time for DDOT to get data on occupancy rates in the existing performance parking zones, but even then, they didn't adjust meter rates very quickly or very often.
Performance parking depends on actual market-rate meter rates to succeed. It's not just a strategy to charge more money, but gives drivers a promise in return: You'll be able to find a space, even if it's more expensive.
DDOT Director Terry Bellamy argued at last year's oversight hearing that the ballpark district isn't the best place to try performance parking. Demand fluctuates so greatly around the baseball schedule. In Columbia Heights, Harvey argued against making any changes until streetscape construction concluded.
On H Street, the streetscape is done and demand is less dependent on specific events, so this is a good opportunity for DDOT to demonstrate that it can, and will, actually make a performance parking zone work by truly adjusting meter rates to match demand.
Charge for non-resident parking on neighborhood streets
DDOT can make the pilot work even better with one more simple change: Let people park on the neighborhood streets, but charge non-residents for the privilege.
A major objective of performance parking is to reduce circling. Just park at the meter for a few bucks instead of driving around looking for free spaces. But as long as one side of every street remains free for visitors to park, and both sides of streets more than a block away from H Street, many people will still try to find a spot in the neighborhood.
Now that DDOT has very successful pay-by-phone technology, they can easily put up signs on residential streets saying, "Drivers without Zone 6 stickers must pay with ParkMobile." Set a rate on the side streets that, like on H itself, ensures that every single space doesn't fill up.
With this, DDOT can apply such a restriction to both sides of the street, not just one. Residents will enjoy a high likelihood of finding spaces near their homes, and the neighborhood can raise extra revenue to pay for more improvements like more Capital Bikeshare stations, trash compactors, or maybe real-time screens.
Who's a resident?
Restricting parking on one side of each street to "residents" further exacerbates the silly effects of the current, large parking zones. A resident who lives 2½ miles away in Southwest Waterfront or Shaw will be able to park on residential blocks of H Street for free, while a resident of southeast Trinidad might be prohibited from parking 2 blocks from home.
Georgetown currently restricts parking to Zone 2 residents only on certain blocks for the O and P Street reconstruction. That made it really easy for me to park there one day I drove to Georgetown, but giving Dupont or Logan residents special privileges is not the point. If a policy is supposed to help residents park near their homes, then it should only apply to actual residents of the area.
It's long past time to set up zones that match actual neighborhoods, rather than the arbitrary and too-large ward boundaries. The Mayor's Parking Taskforce (that's Mayor Williams) recommended doing this 8 years ago (section 4.4.1).
An H street performance parking zone presents a great opportunity for DDOT, to demonstrate that it can capably manage a performance parking zone and achieve the policy objectives of ensuring some availability and reducing circling. Its stewardship of the other two zones has disappointed, but this zone lacks many of the obstacles of previous zones.
Given DDOT's reluctance in recent years to actually follow through on implementing its performance parking policies, it would be helpful for area residents and supporters of performance parking to attend the meeting tonight. It's at Sherwood Recreation Center, 640 10th Street, NE, from 6:30-8 pm.
Comments
- Community stories show the shift to a walkable lifestyle
- Young kids try to assault me while biking
- Focus transportation on downtown or neighborhoods?
- Some are pushing to limit sidewalk cycling
- Where is downtown Prince George's County?
- Metro bag searches aren't always optional
- Endless zoning update delay hurts homeowners







Wouldn't it be more efficient to just charge everyone the same.
by MW on Feb 16, 2012 3:47 pm • link • report
Everyone else must pay.
by MW on Feb 16, 2012 3:50 pm • link • report
Maybe someone who knows more about performance parking can correct my head-scratching, but until the streetcar is actually running to provide an additional transit option to H, will the lack of available alternative parking make circling even worse? My completely anecdotal impression is that driving is very much the preferred mode for prime-time visitors in search of dinner, drinks, concerts, etc.
If the goal is to shift more H Street patrons to transit, cool, but I think that plan needs a little more transit to really work.
by worthing on Feb 16, 2012 4:15 pm • link • report
I had no idea that this was actually recommended back in the Williams administration. Why no movement?
by chris on Feb 16, 2012 4:20 pm • link • report
by Richard Layman on Feb 16, 2012 4:37 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Feb 16, 2012 4:39 pm • link • report
by Geoffrey Hatchard on Feb 16, 2012 5:22 pm • link • report
by charlie on Feb 16, 2012 5:39 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Feb 16, 2012 5:46 pm • link • report
During work days, commuters from the other end of Zone 6 park in my 'hood and walk to the metro.
There are more cars parked on the street during the day than at night. New apartment buildings are only exacerbating the problem
by NY Ave Metro Parking on Feb 16, 2012 5:52 pm • link • report
by charlie on Feb 16, 2012 6:01 pm • link • report
This is particularly true for arts events at the Playhouse and Atlas, where in much of our weather, I don't want to arrive by bike. An effort to make the Hechinger Mall lot available would certainly help.
by Arl Fan on Feb 16, 2012 6:07 pm • link • report
by Turnip on Feb 16, 2012 8:53 pm • link • report
Using Parkmobile is completely voluntary. You can use a credit card, a debit card, or cash to feed one of the green kiosks. You might just as well complain about the city "forcing" you to pay a private company for valet parking. Totally voluntary. Those who wish to carry giant sacks of quarters around with them can knock themselves out.
by oboe on Feb 16, 2012 11:30 pm • link • report
Not according to the suggestion in the article:
Now that DDOT has very successful pay-by-phone technology, they can easily put up signs on residential streets saying, "Drivers without Zone 6 stickers must pay with ParkMobile."
by Falls Church on Feb 17, 2012 12:42 am • link • report
by jessica on Feb 17, 2012 8:06 am • link • report
True, and we could argue about the various issues that brings up.
Of course, local governments outsource many, many roles to private industry (that's just where we are today). It's just that in the case of, say, traffic photo enforcement the premium charged by the contractor isn't made explicit as in the case of Parkmobile. You can't "choose" your parking fee collector, but neither can you choose your photo enforcement company.
The simple answer to this is to allow parkers to walk to one of the many green kiosks on H Street, get a receipt, and put it in their windshield.
by oboe on Feb 17, 2012 10:30 am • link • report
One recommendation was that the RPP zones should correspond to ANCs, not to wards, and that RPP zoning would be throughout the ANC (or not), not block by block. The District Council has been unwilling to touch this issue. CM Graham is actually making an effort, here in Ward One, but DDOT is doing its best to nullify his effort. As far as DDOT is concerned, if you don't live on an RPP-zoned block, then you're not a resident, you don't get residential parking privileges, you don't get visitor passes. You are, as the Task Force reported eight years ago, "treated in the same way as a visitor or commuter".
by Jack on Feb 17, 2012 10:55 am • link • report
If the X2 starts running 50% more frequently, that could pick up some of the slack. If the streetcar winks into existence or the Hechinger Mall parking becomes available, another good adaptation. But if everything else stays status quo, area residents heading to Granville might choose metro-anchored Brasserie Beck for their mussels/Belgian beer needs, simply because they know they can get there and back without a challenge.
by worthing on Feb 17, 2012 2:38 pm • link • report
DDOT should take a look at what San Francisco did. They raised time limits to four hours or no time limit, and kept the same revenues. They wrote far fewer tickets, collecting more revenue directly from the meters. I bet that in general people would rather just pay the meter than deal with getting a ticket.
by Michael Perkins on Feb 17, 2012 2:46 pm • link • report
by Doug on Feb 19, 2012 12:15 am • link • report
This entire idea depends on enforcement. I wonder, nay doubt, that there will be any.
by goldfish on Feb 19, 2012 12:25 am • link • report
Add a Comment