Greater Greater Washington

Government


ANC boundaries still not final, shift in secret

The DC Council was supposed to codify the new Advisory Neighborhood Commission and Single Member District boundaries right after the first of the year. We are days away from March, and the council has not adopted these changes. Meanwhile, the boundaries continue shifting based on discussions behind closed doors.


Some changes to Ward 5 SMDs. See below for full version.

In Ward 5, for example, 3 blocks have shifted from one SMD to another, and the only apparent reason is that it keeps a local political family together.

That change tossed one block out of SMDs with its own neighborhood and forced it into an SMD with a separate neighborhood across a major road.

We discussed the redistricting process in Ward 5 at length in a series of posts at the end of 2011.

At the end of a public hearing on November 29, 2011, at the end of that hearing, Councilmember Jack Evans, co-chair of the council's subcommittee on redistricting, stated that he and his co-chairs, Michael Brown and Phil Mendelson, "will now sit down, take stock of where we are, and then move forward in anticipation of finishing this all up in a timely fashion by the end of the year."

Michael Brown added that the record would remain open until December 9, 2011, to allow for further comments from the public. They would mark up a bill (PDF) codifying the boundaries during the week of December 12, take a first vote on December 20, and the second and final vote "sometime in January."

Brown noted that ward boundaries had to be set by the end of the year, but the ANC and SMD boundaries did not have to be finalized until "the first part of the year."

But January has come and gone with no action. Months have passed, and these boundaries continue to change.

Ward 5 boundaries keep shifting

For Ward 5, we proposed a rational map in lieu of the flawed map from the office of former councilmember Harry Thomas, Jr. Shortly after the November hearing, our map was, for the most part, adopted.

In early February, the Office of Planning posted updated maps on a Google page which lists version numbers for each posted document. Strangely, instead of listing a new version number for the maps of wards 3, 5, and 6, the page still labels each one v.1, even though the time stamp is February 9 for these 3 wards, and December 16 for the others.

The earlier versions of these maps are no longer available to the public, though a copy of the Ward 5 map from December 16 is still available via this Greater Greater Washington post.


Image by the author from DC Office of Planning base layer.

The maps above shows the changes to Ward 5 boundaries in red. 3 blocks in the Carver-Langston and Trinidad neighborhoods, as well as one in Brentwood, have been shifted into different SMDs. One of these shifts appears to have been made to ensure that a local political family remains in one SMD.

Kathy Henderson, currently a candidate for the Ward 5 council seat and a former ANC commissioner, lives on the south side of L Street NE, while her daughter, India Henderson, lives across the street and is the current commissioner. The SMD boundary proposed on December 16 would have put them in separate SMDs, but the line has been shifted one block north to Lang Place NE. This necessitated shifting 2 other nearby blocks to keep the size of any Carver-Langston SMDs from falling below 1900 residents.

What is curious is that India Henderson lists her residence with the Office of Advisory Neighborhood Commissions at 1807 L Street NE, Kathy Henderson's house, while she is registered to vote at 1812 L Street NE, a house India Henderson herself owns.

Which SMDs the Hendersons are or are not located in is of little concern to me personally, but this move also took a block of Trinidad out of one of the 3 SMDs for the neighborhood. The homes on the east side of the 1200 block of 16th Street NE are now separated from the rest of a compact, cohesive neighborhood, instead to be represented along with a different neighborhood on the other side of a major arterial road, Bladensburg Road.

It would be interesting to hear from the councilmembers on the redistricting subcommittee both why they haven't moved the bill for so long and why they deemed these changes necessary. Is it over something as silly as placating a local politico, or is there a solid, defensible reason for undoing prior work to make logical sense of the boundaries at the neighborhood level? Why has this process festered for so long without reaching its ultimate conclusion, and how much longer will we wait?

Geoff Hatchard is a geographer working for the U.S. Census Bureau. He lives in DC's Trinidad neighborhood. The opinions and views expressed in Geoff's writing on this blog are his, and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer. 

Comments

Add a comment »

If we ever wake up one day and find that you've been turned into IMGopher Stew, we can go ahead and assume that Kathy Henderson is the prime suspect, right?

by Dizzy on Feb 27, 2012 2:56 pm • linkreport

The basic reason for the delay is that the Council is reaching out to the residents of Ward 5 for feedback. This was not done since HTJ left office. Just before he left office he came up with the map that GGW proposed. Since then residents have commented to the Council, but not everyone knew about the new map. So, in fairness to all the Council is completing the job HTJ started. All ANCs should have the Council come and explain the new map and have residents submit their comments. This really has not been done.

by BW on Feb 27, 2012 8:52 pm • linkreport

BW: You make a good point that the ability for residents to comment on anything regarding redistricting was limited after Harry Thomas left office. I question your statement that he "came up" with the December map, though.

That map was produced by the Office of Planning, based off of one produced by me, Geovani Bonilla, Tim Clark, James Fournier, and John Salatti.

by Geoffrey Hatchard on Feb 27, 2012 8:58 pm • linkreport

I agree, it would be helpful for the maps to have version numbers so residents can understand changes since the Fall.

by Andrew on Feb 27, 2012 9:36 pm • linkreport

BW: As someone who keeps far too close tabs on the goings on in ward 5 and attends more meetings than my wife would like, let me tell you they're not seeking input from Ward 5. Or, at least, they haven't been doing so in public.

I got to multiple meetings a week in Ward 5 and we all think the redistricting is settled. I guess word hasn't gotten down to the wilson bldg.

by Nolan on Feb 27, 2012 9:52 pm • linkreport

ANC 8D opposed the Ward 8 Task Force's recommendation and proposed amendments, with as many residents testifying at the November 29 hearing as Ward 5. CM Barry subsequently accepted the Commission's recommendation. Why that did not receive a single mention in this article is beyond me.

The delay on adjusting ANC boundaries has nothing to do with HTJ. The Subcommittee on Redistricting did not have any staff assigned to it and the Councilmembers never marked up the bill themselves nor did they advance it by way of the legislative agenda.

by Dionne Brown on Feb 28, 2012 10:49 am • linkreport

Dionne Brown: I'm sorry I didn't bring up anything related to Ward 8. The article was focused on the ward where I live and was involved in the redistricting process. Michael Brown did have a staff member working on this bill, but he has since resigned to run in the Ward 5 special election.

by Geoffrey Hatchard on Feb 28, 2012 11:03 am • linkreport

@Geoffrey. The Council was not bound to the original ANC SMD deadlines by statute, unlike ward redistricting. It was originally postponed to rush the ethics bill at the end of 2011. Although random Council staff members worked on redistricting, none were assigned to the Subcommittee on an official basis.

Only Wards 5 and 8 had significant opposition to their respective Task Force's plans. My understanding is they both have been resolved, but not advanced to the full Council for approval. It goes back to the lack of resources dedicated to it, but should be complete before the end of March.

by Dionne Brown on Feb 28, 2012 3:13 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or