Greater Greater Washington

Budget


Use rosier Metro outlook to reduce fare hike

The Transit First coalition, representing Metro riders, labor, environmental, and community groups, called on Metro and the local governments that help fund it to use the entire $16 million savings in the improved budget outlook to roll back proposed fare increases. Their statement is below:


Photo by joekerstef on Flickr.

Under a proposal submitted yesterday to Metro's finance committee by General Manager Richard Sarles, only $10 million of the $16 million savings would go to riders. Government support of Metro would be cut back by $6 million from the previous budget plan.

In light of the improved Metro budget forecast, we call on the Metro board and member governments to match the riders' commitment to better transit service. Metro riders have continued to pay more for service, even while enduring service interruptions and breakdowns. The original budget plan allocated a greater burden to riders to make up for the budget gap.

Now that the revenue outlook has improved, the riders should get a break on the fare increases they are facing. Transit riders have paid a significant share of the increases in transportation costs for twenty years during which fares have steadily risen without a single increase in the gas tax.

Fixing Metro will be impossible without adequate resources. Riders stepped up to the plate in 2010 to pay a substantial fare increase. The fairest approach now is for the member jurisdictions to maintain the funding commitment already planned in the 2013 Metro budget. We call on local governments, the District of Columbia, and the states of Maryland and Virginia to focus on reinvesting in and restoring what was once, and can be again, one of the world's top transit systems.

The members of the Transit First Coalition are the Action Committee for Transit, Alexandria Transit Riders Alliance, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689, Arlington Coalition for Sensible Transportation, Audubon Naturalist Society, CASA de Maryland, Clean Water Action, Coalition for Smarter Growth, Crofton First, DC Night Riders, Greater Greater Washington, MCGEOUFCW Local 1994, Prince George's Advocates for Community-based Transit, Progressive Maryland, Save Maryland Area Rail Transit, and Transit Riders United of Greenbelt.

The Coalition for Smarter Growth has a page for you to email your WMATA board members and local officials to ask them to use money to reduce fare increases as much as possible.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Why wouldn't the money be better spent on decreasing the backlog of deferred maintenance, if the extra cash can make that happen faster? For most riders, a reliable Metro is more important than a 10 percent fare change, I think.

Of course, if they want to get the salary and benefits paid to the accused murderer they put on paid leave for a year, THAT could go toward reducing fairs. The guy should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. The nature of the crime he was accused of did not in itself suggest that he would be a danger to either coworkers or fare payers. Either the guy should been allowed to keep working or he should have been suspended without pay pending the outcome of his trial.

I find Metro's decision in this matter unfathomable.

by MetroFan on Apr 10, 2012 2:57 pm • linkreport

"Why wouldn't the money be better spent on decreasing the backlog of deferred maintenance, if the extra cash can make that happen faster"

well one reason I can think of is that the proposed fare increase is high enough to impact the number of riders, and will so be a very inefficient way to increase revenue, and may even create the possibility of a death spiral.

by AWalkerInTheCity on Apr 10, 2012 3:01 pm • linkreport

No, how about use it to improve the system.

by Doug on Apr 10, 2012 3:05 pm • linkreport

How about a non-stupid monthly pass proposal? It really shouldn't be that hard to make it last a month instead of 28 days, and make it so that people can actually apply SmartBenefits to it...

by Gray on Apr 10, 2012 4:06 pm • linkreport

Actually, I think the lack of reliability is more likely to impact ridership than the proposed fare hike. I agree, spend more to get the system in a state of good repair. For years Metro has deferred maintenance in order to hold down fare increases and now we're paying for it.

by Falls Church on Apr 10, 2012 6:24 pm • linkreport

Wouldn't it be nice to be able to use the SmarTrip to pay for multiple riders like they do in Chicago and other cities? Doesn't seem very efficient to me that a family who rides regularly together would all need their ownd card. When I have out of town guests, I loan my extra SmarTrip card to them, but would gladly add their fare to my card if I could. This is especially important if they continue to increase the price of paper fare cards. Why not use other fare media that is in between paper and the current SmarTrip cards? The thin plastic cards that are used in systems such as CTA hold up a lot better than the paper ones used, but less expensive than a SmarTrip style card.

by Todd on Apr 10, 2012 9:28 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or