Greater Greater Washington

Transit


"Everyone benefits if we can leave our cars"

During the campaign, Transportation For America created this pledge, which they asked candidates to sign to show their support for a new direction in transportation funding:

I support Amtrak funding and the development of high-speed freight and passenger rail networks across the country. ... I will also re-commit federal resources to public mass transportation projects across the country. ... And I will further promote transit by creating incentives for transit usage that are equal to the current incentives for driving.

All of these measures will have significant environmental and metropolitan planning advantages and help diversify our nation's transportation infrastructure. Everyone benefits if we can leave our cars, walk, bicycle and access other transportation alternatives. I agree that we can stop wasteful spending and save Americans money, and as president, I will re-evaluate the transportation funding process to ensure that smart growth considerations are taken into account.

Actually, I lied. Transportation For America didn't write this. Barack Obama did. (Well, his staff, presumably.) After T4A urged its supporters to sign a petition to John McCain and Barack Obama on the need for better transportation solutions, Obama sent them this thank-you letter containing the above passage.

I don't agree with everything Barack Obama says all the time. And sometimes I find myself frustrated by some of his campaign tactics, staffing decisions, or policy positions. But on transportation, so far he's never wavered. We really couldn't ask for anything better in a Presidentso far.

Now it's up to Obama's transportation transition team to get the right people in senior positions in the government, like the new Office of Urban Policy and of course USDOT. And it's up to the President to deliver on his promises. But seriously, this is pretty kick ass.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Thank God!!!

by Thayer-D on Nov 20, 2008 2:07 pm • linkreport

2 reasons why we won't see federal spending on transportation infrastructure:

a- people in non-urban areas will, in an time of economic downturn, not be very enthusiastic about funding which would mainly benefit urban area

b- the time-lag issues involved with investments in infrastructure and the macro benefits.

by Tim on Nov 20, 2008 5:19 pm • linkreport

if one can think of a political strategy to convince the American public that a gas tax akin to Great Britain's would be beneficial, then real movement can be made on mass transit and smart growth. Otherwise, the economic downturn will keep gas prices low and discourage anything but the CITSR (cheapest in the short run - at least in terms of what people perceive) alternative. And of course, cheap now only means we pay later (greater dependence on foreign oil, sprawl traffic).

Sorry to be a downer, but I'm reading that gas prices are now predicted to go below 2 bucks a gallon (although our military tax to protect the oil fields where we get the gas isn't going down, but i digress).

by stevek_fairfax on Nov 20, 2008 7:31 pm • linkreport

I really really really don't think that it's a good idea to raise a gas consumption tax during the time of an economic downturn. It makes no sense politically or economically.

The time to do this was in the late 90's when: A- gas was really cheap and B- the economy was robust enough to absorb the tax.

by Tim on Nov 21, 2008 12:12 am • linkreport

While the ability to clearly outline all the difficulties ahead of us is essential to solving the problems we face, it's no substitute for visionary action based on empirical evidence. In other words, we can wait around fat and happy until our overlords (OPEC/speculators) decide to turn the screws on us, or we can begin the dificult process towards weening ourselves off foreign feul. Just like a headlining story today says "U.S. intelligence analyis predicts Moscow will benefit from oil boom while American influence wanes."

It's not just about vibrant and walkable mainstreets.

by Thayer-D on Nov 21, 2008 7:31 am • linkreport

"now predicted to go below 2 bucks"

I hear out in the boonies that it is already below $2 and some places its below $1.80

by RJ on Nov 21, 2008 8:15 am • linkreport

@ RJ

If by "boonies" you mean Rockville, then yes gas is below two bucks in the boonies :)

by local on Nov 21, 2008 9:28 am • linkreport

Leave our bicycle where?

"Everyone benefits if we can leave our cars, walk, bicycle and access other transport [] alternatives."

by John Kane on Dec 3, 2008 1:31 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or