Development
College for sale
Are you looking to buy a college? After four decades in the Hillandale section of Montgomery County, the National Labor College announced that they will sell its campus this summer, reports the Gazette.
The college, located at New Hampshire Avenue and the Beltway, was previously a Catholic school before the AFL-CIO bought the property in 1974, seeking a permanent place to educate union workers. With just 1,300 students, all of whom can now study online, the college no longer needs a large campus and plans to relocate to an office building somewhere in the area.
The National Labor College leaves behind a 47 acre campus with four residence halls, two classroom buildings, a library, an auditorium and the recently-built Lane Kirkland Conference Center, all of which surround a small quad.
There's also what appears to be a basketball court and baseball diamond. (In case you're as unfamiliar with the site as I was, the campus does not include Holly Hall, a retirement community whose red-brick buildings make it look like part of the college.)
What can one do with a former college? Naturally, the campus would lend itself to another school, but we shouldn't be limited by that. The campus might be a nice place for a security-minded government tenant to locate, but judging from the stalled progress at St. Elizabeth's in the District, it's unlikely that any federal agencies will be poking around here.
Besides, we probably don't want that anyway. When the Food and Drug Administration relocated their headquarters to the former Naval Ordnance Laboratory farther up New Hampshire Avenue, there was an opportunity to use its 710-acre property for a mix of uses, including retail, housing or parkland.
But neighbors in Hillandale "[were] going to have none of that," as one resident told the Washington Post. Instead, we got an isolated office campus whose 7,000 workers barely venture out for lunch, much to the chagrin of local restaurants.
The National Labor College land is far too valuable to make that mistake again. It's next to the Beltway and just one exit away from I-95. It's also part of the White Oak Science Gateway, which is what county planners call the research and development center they'd like to create in the area. There are a lot of possibilities here, and we shouldn't be so quick to shut them off.
It's not every day that 47 acres suddenly appears in the middle of an established community. This is a great opportunity and we'd do well to seize it.
Comments
- Young kids try to assault me while biking
- Metro bag searches aren't always optional
- Focus transportation on downtown or neighborhoods?
- Endless zoning update delay hurts homeowners
- Redeveloping McMillan is the only way to save it
- DDOT agrees to repave 15th Street cycle track
- Vienna Metro town center won't have a town center









We'd do well to seize it? That makes no sense. Are you suggesting that the government take this land to build what you want on it? What "we'd do well" to do would be butting out and letting a private developer maximize return on investment.
by Annon on Apr 17, 2012 10:18 am • link • report
by dan reed! on Apr 17, 2012 10:28 am • link • report
by mike on Apr 17, 2012 10:45 am • link • report
Unfortunately this site is pretty far from rail transit in a non-dense area. Any residential development would be totally car dependent - and I don't think this area of MontCo needs more residential development, as it already has some of the cheapest housing prices in the county.
The location will hopefully attract some sort of large company and bring higher paying jobs to the east side of the county.
by Nick on Apr 17, 2012 11:02 am • link • report
The location will hopefully attract some sort of large company and bring higher paying jobs to the east side of the county.
Hear, hear!
Nick has the right idea!
This site needs to be about employment and absolutely not more residential development (of which the White Oak/Fairland Policy Area has plenty right now).
I just hope that Montgomery County's planning and approval processes do not scare-away potential employers that might want to locate here.
Possible users might include:
A life sciences employer that wants to be near the Food and Drug Administration; or
Some sort of off-campus annex for a part of the University of Maryland?
by C. P. Zilliacus on Apr 17, 2012 11:27 am • link • report
by Alec. S. on Apr 17, 2012 11:27 am • link • report
That's not to say housing is the best use for the NLC site, but we should keep an open mind. A single-use development, whether it's an office park or a single-family subdivision, isn't appropriate for a site as big as this in an established community.
by dan reed! on Apr 17, 2012 11:32 am • link • report
by Mike on Apr 17, 2012 11:44 am • link • report
I agree houses aren't interchangeable. However, I can't see a walkable neighborhood sprouting up without better access to transit near this beltway interchange. The walkable neighborhood will need parking, because to get outside of the neighborhood, one will need to drive, or grab a bus on NH ave.
I'd like to see this site be an office park, maybe mixed with a well planned apartment/TH community along with some sort of community park (make use of that baseball field and basketball court I see on google maps). There already is retail right across NH ave - CVS, safeway, starbucks. Making the 6 lane expressway that is NH ave in this area more walkable would be a great project.
by Nick on Apr 17, 2012 11:46 am • link • report
by dan reed! on Apr 17, 2012 11:51 am • link • report
by Thayer-D on Apr 17, 2012 12:14 pm • link • report
I do not know this campus, but I am doubtful it is either as convenient to existing and future high quality transit, or to a major employment centers, as the Mosaic district is.
Given that, it seems likely that its modal share for single occupant auto will be high, which argues against high density.
That of course does not mean that it should not be made as walkable as possible given its density. Nor does it necessarily exclude some form of multi use. Though it does seem like it would be appealling as a corp campus - I am sure someone has a model for walkable corporate campus incorporating multiple uses, but I can't think of any.
by AWalkerInTheCity on Apr 17, 2012 1:18 pm • link • report
by movement on Apr 17, 2012 3:13 pm • link • report
by Jasper on Apr 17, 2012 3:58 pm • link • report
by Rayful Edmond on Apr 17, 2012 4:01 pm • link • report
Yes, but the campus is too far from a Metro Station to be considered.
by Steve on Apr 17, 2012 4:27 pm • link • report
by Craig on Apr 17, 2012 9:28 pm • link • report
Add a Comment