Preservation
"Adaptive reuse" brings old warehouses and garages to life
I recently visited an American city with many downtown buildings from a long-departed industry. The city's downtown is now experiencing new life, and many of the historic buildings are finding new uses after sitting vacant for many years.
This is a complex of old warehouses which have now become retail and offices. The developer added a really amazing water feature, a long river which cascades down waterfalls at various intervals. There are small footbridges across the river and even stepping stones to cross in one place.
The old chutes for the products remain and now serve as decorative flourishes. In the center is an old railcar, like those that once transported goods to and from the facility.
At another location nearby, people have turned several old garages into bars and music halls. They've also become a popular spot for food trucks, and 2 were sitting outside as we passed by on a Saturday.
Both of these demonstrate the preservation concept of "adaptive reuse." Old, historic buildings can become a valued part of a changing community by taking on different functions that residents need today. The distinct architecture of the structures and the small details that nobody would build today adds character and interest.
Bonus question: Can you guess the city?
Update: Several commenters got it very quickly. This is Durham, North Carolina. The large development is the American Tobacco Campus, where tobacco warehouses have become high-end retail adjacent to the new stadium for the Durham Bulls. The garage-turned-bar and music hall is called Motorco, in honor of the building's historic use.
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- PG planners propose bold new smart growth future
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Prince George's County struggles to get trails right












by David Garber on Apr 24, 2012 4:05 pm • link • report
by Canaan on Apr 24, 2012 4:13 pm • link • report
by Mac on Apr 24, 2012 4:15 pm • link • report
by Thayer-D on Apr 24, 2012 4:21 pm • link • report
by Canaan on Apr 24, 2012 4:33 pm • link • report
by Eric on Apr 24, 2012 4:35 pm • link • report
The more surprising stuff is over in the area near the "old garages" like those in the latter example. This is actually near the old baseball stadium (as seen in "Bull Durham"), which still remains, hosting plenty of events but not usually drawing huge crowds any more. This is basically on the other side of downtown, and as a longtime Durham resident I never expected that area to take off so well. I mean, it had lots of potential, but so did all of downtown Durham--and until the late 2000s very few people ventured there after dark.
by Gray on Apr 24, 2012 4:44 pm • link • report
by OctaviusIII on Apr 24, 2012 5:05 pm • link • report
by MS on Apr 24, 2012 5:06 pm • link • report
by Gray on Apr 24, 2012 5:10 pm • link • report
In a smaller metro area, that's a lot of distance. But I'd always been under the impression that there actually was a lot of commuting between the 2, and saw some stat that the Triangle had the highest VMT per capita of any area of comparable size or something like that, perhaps because it's polycentric.
Gray: The article makes it look like if Orange approves then they can spend it on more transit between Durham and Chapel Hill, which is pretty important.
There was a lot of new transit when I was there, too. There's a new free bus that goes through downtown and over to Duke University, for example.
by David Alpert on Apr 24, 2012 5:33 pm • link • report
by Alison on Apr 24, 2012 5:46 pm • link • report
As for the tax revenue still funding transit even without full buy-in, I'd like to think they'll stick to that--but I suspect that things will change dramatically if one or more counties fails to pass the referendum. There does seem to be more support for Durham county still doing something than I expected, which is promising.
by Gray on Apr 24, 2012 5:48 pm • link • report
[of course, until 1992 Durham had separate school districts for the inner city (90%+ black) and county (90%+ white), but that's a different issue]
by Gray on Apr 24, 2012 5:58 pm • link • report
by Tom Coumaris on Apr 24, 2012 6:07 pm • link • report
by Greg on Apr 24, 2012 6:40 pm • link • report
by JustMe on Apr 24, 2012 6:41 pm • link • report
by Pelham1861 on Apr 25, 2012 8:37 am • link • report
by Brian on Apr 25, 2012 9:29 am • link • report
by Cassidy on Apr 25, 2012 10:00 am • link • report
by Payton on Apr 25, 2012 10:11 am • link • report
by Thayer-D on Apr 25, 2012 10:28 am • link • report
by dcdriver on Apr 25, 2012 4:20 pm • link • report
by dcdriver on Apr 25, 2012 6:13 pm • link • report
by NikolasM on Apr 26, 2012 3:45 pm • link • report
Add a Comment