Greater Greater Washington. The Washington, DC area is great. But it could be greater.

Parking


Have DC Councilmembers ever tried to park downtown on a Saturday?

The Council passed Jim Graham's parking meter rate hike yesterday, raising $1/hour meters to $2 and 50¢ meters to 75¢, and restoring much-needed city housing programs. But to get enough political support from the Council, Graham and co-introducer Tommy Wells had to agree to an amendment from Jack Evans designating $1 million of the revenue raised to the O Street Market project in Shaw, and one from David Catania that retained our current, nonsensical policy of free street parking on weekends.


Are these people really here because of free parking? Photo by afagen on Flickr.

The parking increase will fund the HPAP program that helps low-income people afford a down payment, the Housing First program that moves homeless people from shelters to their own homes, and more. Councilmember Wells praised Graham's leadership on the issue as "very forward thinking," and Chairman Vincent Gray called the bill a "very proactive approach."

But Catania and outgoing member Carol Schwartz both spoke passionately about free Saturday parking as an incentive to draw suburban residents into DC to shop and eat, and to encourage DC residents to stay in the District on weekends to spend their dollars. It might be a compelling argument, except for one thing: there's never any available street parking downtown or in busy neighborhood retail districts on weekend afternoons and evenings.

Schwartz introduced and passed a ban on Saturday parking fees in 1997. "We get money when people come into DC to eat or shop, or DC residents stay to eat," she said. "I asked people, 'Why do you go to the suburbs?' They said, 'They've got free parking.'"

That might have been true in 1997, but not today. People go downtown because of the great restaurants, exciting nightlife, and walkable shopping streets. If you just want to drive to a big box store, the suburbs will win out every time. The nice restaurants downtown all run valet services. If free parking really deters so many people, why are these restaurants packed while the valets are charging $10 for parking during dinner?

And the free, on-street parking that does exist is constantly full. Making the parking free just swaps one suburban advantage, free parking, for another: available parking. As Tommy Wells explained, "How many people here believe they could get in the car right now and find a place to park down the street? ... That parking is all locked up. It does not serve small businesses" that benefit from turnover, not from free parking.

Yet Councilmember after Councilmember spoke up for this amendment keeping parking free on Saturdays, as if anyone really could find parking on Saturdays. Free parking is a "great incentive to bring people downtown," said Catania, "to visit shops and restaurants and our cultural life downtown." Marion Barry added, "we don't want to make it more difficult for people to shop downtown." I seriously started to wonder if any of these folks actually ever drive downtown on a Saturday. Perhaps their special Councilmember parking passes, which many use to park illegally, make them believe that anyone can easily park, with only $1-$2 an hour making the difference.

Phil Mendelson voted against the measure entirely. He argued that this measure is "piecemeal," but said that he "can support a comprehensive review of parking demand." Well, one day we will be discussing performance parking in more neighborhoods in DC. I hope Mendelson will support that program when it comes.

Muriel Bowser also voted against the bill, not because of the parking fees, but because of the earmarks, and particularly Evans' earmark for the O Street Market. "We're taking what should be transportation dollars and putting in human services, and now we're taking what should be transportation dollars and putting it into an economic development grant," she said. Bowser also praised free Saturday parking.

This measure will raise some valuable revenue for important housing projects. But it also revealed many of our Councilmembers' ignorance about the true dynamics of parking. It's not 1997 anymore, and downtown is booming. Keeping parking free only makes it harder for people to park downtown. Schwartz and Catania struck a blow against small businesses today, with the very act they claim will help.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington. He has had a lifelong interest in great cities and great communities. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Apart from Tommy Wells, every member of the DC Council drives everywhere for everything. Literally. They are a "city" council, but in the way they live daily lives, they might as well be the county commissioners of an exurban county. The fact that our political leaders drive everywhere for everything goes a long way towards explaining the lousy service I put up with every day on the D6 and X2 buses. It also explains why and that they are so quick to cave in to NIMBYS who oppose higher density near Metro stations. If they had to regularly ride those crappy and unreliable buses, we would not be debating streetcars or a new subway tunnel -- they would be under construction. Similarly, the argument that density near Metro stations will create traffic and parking problems resonates with them, because they cannot imagine that anyone would go car-free, no matter how close they live to transit.

by rg on Dec 17, 2008 9:14 am  (link)

Perhaps the Council will rethink its approach to how public policy decisions are made as the Obama administration takes office. President-elect Obama has already asserted that decisions will be based on facts. We already have plenty of evidence showing that busy business districts have no parking available for shoppers when it's given away for free. Free parking doesnt do anyone any favors.

by Cheryl Cort on Dec 17, 2008 9:51 am  (link)

Arlington County charges on Saturdays..... Not sure why DC is so sure that this is such an incentive (all it does is reinforce peoples opinion that public transportation is just for commuting... I have seen/known many people that would never take it on the weekends...).

by Daniel on Dec 17, 2008 10:55 am  (link)

Arlington County charges on Saturdays...

To a point...Afternoon and night are free and everything after 6pm is free.

by Rj on Dec 17, 2008 11:25 am  (link)

Arlington probably should probably institute night-time meter charging in Ballston and Clarendon Thursday-Saturday.

As it is, on those nights, on-street parking is nearly impossible to find, and, at least in Ballston, there's an enormous Arlington-owned parking garage that charges a flat $1 for all-night parking. Really, it's ridiculous that the street parking is so hard to access for a quick stop into 7-Eleven when 5-hour partygoers could park in the garage so cheaply. But why would they when it's free on the street?

Even instituting 50-cents-an-hour rates during these night periods would make short-term parking so much easier, because longer-term people would just park in the deck.

by Joey on Dec 17, 2008 1:35 pm  (link)

As Tommy Wells explained, "How many people here believe they could get in the car right now and find a place to park down the street."

Well, some people are sure they are going to win the lottery too.

by kenf on Dec 17, 2008 2:39 pm  (link)

Dave I couldn't agree more. I mentioned the parking disaster in a post this afternoon - http://connetiquette.blogspot.com/2008/12/bojangles-is-at-it-again-now-pay-up.html - but left off the whole Saturday parking thing. I might write about it this weekend, because I agree with you completely. The council is stuck in a mentality when downtown's needed free parking to draw people in, which is totally not the case

by Tim S on Dec 17, 2008 4:39 pm  (link)

The key is to have credit card meters. Coin meters make it much harder for a jurisdiction to raise rates because the average driver notices price changes more. $1 to $2/hr is a big deal if you have to scrap around for lose change. A $1 to $2 change with a credit card machine no big deal same amount of effort to feed the machine.

by RJ on Dec 18, 2008 8:09 am  (link)

Funny I came across this after doing a Google search on Saturday parking in DC. I was considering coming into the District this Saturday (after Christmas), but I was only going to do so if the parking was free. I don't get into DC much but my company had a holiday lunch there last week and I was appalled by how much we had to pay just to park for an hour and a half while we had lunch (in a parking garage). I normally spend less to have lunch near my office than I spent on parking that day. I don't mind spending money on somethings but parking is not one of them, especially when I am spending money on local businesses. In my small town, all parking is free during the holiday season!!!

by Chris D. on Dec 23, 2008 8:44 am  (link)

Chris D: You're right that garage parking in DC is very pricey. This proposal wasn't about the price of garage parking, but street parking. You didn't park on the street because there were probably no spaces to be found.

Increasing the price of street parking would mean more free spaces. That could even make it possible for you to park on the street for cheaper than you spent in that garage.

It's not practical for DC to make garage parking free, first because the garages are private, but also because if parking were free, the garages would always be completely full. Your town can only make parking free during the holidays because there's a lot of it, and as a taxpayer you are paying a lot to subsidize that.

by David Alpert on Dec 23, 2008 10:56 am  (link)

Yes, only come into the city if parking is free. Let's create more surface parking lots while we're at ist

by 1990 called, they want their mentality back on Dec 23, 2008 11:36 am  (link)

Let's be clear about something:

Parking is NEVER free. Never ever ever. Not anywhere.

It's just a matter of who pays. Sometimes users pay directly. Sometimes businesses subsidize it for customers or employees. Sometimes cities subsidize it for businesses or residents. But SOMEBODY always pays.

by BeyondDC on Dec 23, 2008 11:48 am  (link)

I'm going to take this opportunity to ask Chris D a question.

During the holidays when parking is free, is it crowded? Does it take a while to find a parking space, or do you find that there is enough to go around? Do most of the businesses have their own parking lots already, or are you talking about a traditional grid-pattern downtown with mostly on-street parking? If you don't mind, what's the small town you're talking about?

I'm just asking.

by Michael Perkins on Dec 23, 2008 12:06 pm  (link)

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.

Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)

or see below to post

To post your comment, please enter the two words in the box below to prevent spam:

Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time