Greater Greater Washington

Public Spaces


Top of the Park neighborhood shows density done right

Some people may consider "density" a dirty word, but if designed well, a dense community can feel both spacious and private. Take Top of the Park, a 1940's-era condominium in Silver Spring. While none of the townhouses have their own yards, they share a backyard that anyone would envy.


Typical townhouses in Top of the Park. Photo by the author.

Top of the Park was built in 1942 as apartments and converted to condominiums in the 1970's. It's a pro­duct of the Garden City movement, which tried at the turn of the 20th century to synthe­size the best features of the city and country, giving residents access to urban amenities in a more natural setting.

Garden City ideas were very popular in the design of European neighborhoods, but they appeared in American communities as well, like Radburn, New Jersey and nearby Greenbelt.

Though it was built on what was once the suburban edge, Top of the Park can arguably be called an urban neighborhood now, surrounded by taller buildings and within a short walk of the Long Branch shopping district. One day, it will be a few blocks from two Purple Line stations.

Parking Area
Parking is organized along a few dead-end streets.

Nonetheless, the community still retains a country feel. In keeping with the Garden City ideal of separating car and pedestrian traffic, Top of the Park is organized around a few dead-end streets where residents park their cars, then walk through shared courtyards to their homes, which face common footpaths.

Benches
A built-in bench along a walkway.

The walk from the car to the house can be a little long, but it might be worth it. The paths are lined with beautiful flowers and bushes, and everywhere you look are views of mature trees. Little touches like these built-in benches make the walkways a place for spending time in, not just passing through.

The original designers also took advantage of the site's hilly terrain. The two rows of houses pictured above can't be more than 50 feet apart, but placing one of them at a higher elevation ensures that they don't look directly into each other, giving residents more privacy.

Rowhouse With Porch
Townhouse with a porch.

Since it's a condominium, Top of the Park residents own their homes, but not the land they sit on. However, they are allowed to make some alterations to the front and back of their units, like this porch. This policy gives residents the ability to individualize their homes, but at a lower cost than if they bought a conventional townhouse or detached house with a private yard.

Shared Courtyard
One of the courtyards.

Besides, residents get to enjoy these shared courtyards, filled with trees, flowers and some outdoor furniture. When I visited a few months ago, I heard birds singing as neighbors tended their gardens and kids ran around. I imagine it would be very difficult, or at least very expensive, to find a private yard this nice this close to downtown Silver Spring.

Picnic Table
Picnic table and benches in a courtyard.

These terraces seem to lend themselves well to neighborly gatherings, like a picnic or cookout. I noticed that in addition to providing shade, the trees screen views of the surrounding houses, giving them privacy.

Walkway With Tall Trees
A walkway lined with tall trees and landscaping.

With 166 homes on 15 acres, Top of the Park wouldn't be mistaken for Manhattan, but it's part of one of Montgomery County's densest neighborhoods. It's also about as dense as some recently-built or proposed townhouse developments around Silver Spring. Unlike those neighborhoods, however, Top of the Park has had decades to let its trees grow to the point where you can barely see the houses between them in an aerial photo. Hopefully, the same thing will happen in newer projects.

Top of the Park may be 70 years old, but it shows that we can still offer privacy, ample open space and opportunities for personal expression to families who may not want or can't afford a large, detached house. It's a useful example for Montgomery County as it tries to accommodate a growing population in an increasingly limited space.

A planner and architect by training, Dan Reed is interested in suburban retrofits. Dan works for the Friends of White Flint, writes his own blog, Just Up the Pike, and serves as the Land Use Chair for the Action Committee for Transit. Dan lives in Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

"Top of the Park can arguably be called an urban neighborhood now," I'm not sure I'd call it urban. The streets don't go through and the buildings don't form an out door room. It's a mature suburban townhouse development. I wouldn't call LeCorbusier's Villa Radieuse urban either. Just becasue a place is dense, dosen't make it urban. That being said, it's an interesting alternative and the topography is very nice. It just goes to show if you build with natural materials and an let the trees grow, you'll get something nice no matter how it looks when completed.

by Thayer-D on Jun 15, 2012 11:07 am • linkreport

@Thayer-D

That's fair, but if we say urbanism is like a continuum, maybe Top of the Park is closer to the "urban" side than the "suburban" side.

by dan reed! on Jun 15, 2012 11:11 am • linkreport

You lost me at "Silver Spring"

by Snob on Jun 15, 2012 11:14 am • linkreport

The trees make it.

We need more trees.

by andrew on Jun 15, 2012 11:27 am • linkreport

There are similar lay outs all over fairfax (I used to live in one as well). The problem in my neighborhood was that the outdoor green spaces weren't as utilized as what was shown. I think it would have been better if there was rear alley access and then the mini-green areas could have been larger since not as much room had to go for parking spots and brought the houses right up to the street making it look nicer and more urban.

Looking at your pictures though seem to be the intent of what I experienced though some things prevented it from being as nice.

by drumz on Jun 15, 2012 11:28 am • linkreport

I like these houses, and if I didn't have good reasons to continue living where I am, I would consider buying the house that's for sale there right now for $299K. As for urban/non-urban, I think part of what matters is context - if this development was surrounded by other higher-density dwellings and had some retail then it would feel more urban, but instead it borders a park, single family homes with yards, a few tall apartments buildings, and a strip mall (which also incidentally describes some parts of NW DC). On a tangentially related note, are there any recent updates on the purple line? I've been hearing about it since I was a freshman at UMCP and it would be nice to see it built in my lifetime :)

by grumpy on Jun 15, 2012 12:17 pm • linkreport

Looks a lot like Old Greenbelt.

by Greenbelt on Jun 15, 2012 3:15 pm • linkreport

There are scores of suburban garden apartment complexes in that area of Silver Spring which are similar. Top of the Park has nicer landscaping than most -- more shrubbery and ground planting, in contrast to standard garden apartment landscaping of grass lawn only.

My distinction between urban and suburban is the inclusiveness or exclusiveness of the civic space. Are strangers welcome on the streets and sidewalks of Top of the Park? My guess is in that in general, the answer is no. Contrast that to most streets and blocks in DC, where strangers are free to walk the sidewalks and everyone takes that freedom for granted.

by Laurence Aurbach on Jun 15, 2012 9:21 pm • linkreport

Looks a lot like Park Fairfax, and other various 40's era developments around Arlington & Alexandria.

by spookiness on Jun 17, 2012 9:16 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or