Greater Greater Washington

Development


Montgomery council votes for townhouses at Chelsea School

After 2 years of controversy, the County Council voted to rezone the former Chelsea School site just outside downtown Silver Spring on Tuesday, opening the door for a proposed townhouse development.


Townhomes like this could be coming to Silver Spring. Photo by the author.

Seven councilmembers voted in favor of rezoning the private school's 5-acre property at Pershing Drive and Springvale Road from the R-60 zone, which allows single-family homes, to the RT-12.5 zone. This allows Bethesda-based developer EYA to move ahead with their proposal to replace the school with 63 town­homes and restore a historic single-family home in a development called Chelsea Court.

In this report, the council asserted that EYA's revised design would be appropriate transition between downtown Silver Spring and the adjacent Seven Oaks-Evanswood neighborhood while providing adequate buffers from surrounding houses and attempting to reduce cut-through traffic.

At-large Councilmember Marc Elrich voted against the rezoning, while District 5 Councilmember Valerie Ervin, who represents the neighborhood where the project would be built, chose to abstain was absent due to illness. The council also voted not to allow additional oral arguments on the zoning change.

EYA first proposed rezoning the property to allow 76 townhomes two years ago. While many residents and county planners supported the proposal, not everyone was convinced.

In the summer of 2010, a group of residents in the surrounding Seven Oaks-Evanswood neighborhood formed the Chelsea School Task Force to oppose the project, citing concerns about the project's density and the perceived loss of open space. The County Council agreed and rejected EYA's proposal last fall.

However, they asked the developer to revisit their design and have it reviewed by the county's Hearing Examiner before coming back for another council vote. EYA returned with a new proposal, containing just 64 homes and additional open space, that was approved by the Hearing Examiner last month.

With the rezoning approved, EYA will now be able to submit a site plan to the Planning Board for approval. According to an e-mail sent out to community members, they will also hold an open house this summer to "talk with neighbors about what they would like to see in such details as architecture and landscaping."

The County Council won't make everyone happy with their choice to allow townhouses at the Chelsea School, but they made the right one. We can't fault residents for liking their neighborhood the way it is; after all, it's a very nice place to live. Nor can we pull up the bridge and deny other people the opportunity to enjoy it as well.

A planner and architect by training, Dan Reed is interested in suburban retrofits. Dan works for the Friends of White Flint, writes his own blog, Just Up the Pike, and serves as the Land Use Chair for the Action Committee for Transit. Dan lives in Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

The 63 individuals/families able to buy new construction townhomes will be the sole contributing factor that turns Silver Spring from a leafy, quiet suburb to a soul-less urban wasteland that Charles Dickens could not have imagined. You were warned Montgomery County.

by drumz on Jun 14, 2012 2:54 pm • linkreport

FInally. There's a serious disconect with those who proport to like sustainability and smart growth, except when it shows up on their front door. One example would be council memger Elrich who's Bus Rapid Transit proposal is the smartest idea since the Purple line, yet he opposed this project. What does he think the BRT will bring those areas it will pass through?

by Thayer-D on Jun 14, 2012 3:08 pm • linkreport

Boom.

A win for Silver Spring.

by Patrick Thornton on Jun 14, 2012 3:27 pm • linkreport

Opposition brought to you by the rhetorical masters of "Less dense makes sense" and "No train on Wayne." Hey hey, baa baa...

by jnb on Jun 14, 2012 3:28 pm • linkreport

@Drumz

Trying to figure out when downtown Silver Spring was a leafy suburban suburb, and how adding 63 new families will somehow turn it into a "soul-less urban wasteland..." Whatever that means.

by Kyle W on Jun 14, 2012 4:00 pm • linkreport

Poe's Law, drumz.

by MLD on Jun 14, 2012 4:11 pm • linkreport

Just playin' y'all. EYA does great stuff this will actually do more to help define silver spring's sense of place.

I just enjoy hysterics and hand wringing about how townhouses fundamentally alter the character of an area considered to be a downtown for large sections of Montgomery county.

by drumz on Jun 14, 2012 4:17 pm • linkreport

@Drumz

I had Poe's Law in my head! That was so illogical haha!

Great to keep seeing progress.

by Kyle W on Jun 14, 2012 4:33 pm • linkreport

Good news for supporters of totally reasonable density increases in DTSS.

by Lindemann on Jun 14, 2012 7:04 pm • linkreport

Good to see that NIMBYs aren't able to derail all sensible, reasonably well-designed projects. Downtown Silver Spring needs to continue to add residential density if we ever hope to get rid of that monstrosity known as City Place.

by Rebecca on Jun 15, 2012 9:10 am • linkreport

Glad to see that the Council passed this. Chelsea Court is a logical transition from the core downtown to the leafy single-family home neighborhoods surrounding. EYA builds classy homes and I love their slogan "Life Within Walking Distance." Chelsea Court fulfills that goal.

by Tina S on Jun 15, 2012 10:38 am • linkreport

Does anyone know an ETA on this development?

Even with it, Silver Spring still really lacks townhouses, which may make it difficult for Millennials to stay in Silver Spring as they get older. Many no longer want single family homes, and the DTSS area really doesn't have many apartment/condo units bigger than 2 bedrooms. Townhouses are a logical next step for Millennials as their families expand.

Unfortunately, the DTSS area is really underserved by townhouses. Fenton Village would be an excellent place to build more, but I haven't heard of any projects on the way.

The county council needs to keep this in mind when it faces more NIMBY opposition in the future to townhouses and other development that is in demand. The people who only want leafy suburbs don't represent the future of this area, not do they understand what the largest generation in U.S history wants. Montgomery County must stay competitive with other jurisdictions.

by Patrick Thornton on Jun 15, 2012 11:31 am • linkreport

I don't know when this will get built, but the hard part is basically over. What we know is that EYA has to get their site plan approved and apply for permits, and over the summer they'll have an open house to discuss the project with neighbors. Beyond that it's a matter of having construction funds, and I don't know anything about that. Or, of course, what recourse the opposing neighbors have.

by dan reed! on Jun 15, 2012 11:39 am • linkreport

Anyone know why Marc Elrich voted against this?

by Ken Firestone on Jun 15, 2012 4:25 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or