The Washington, DC region is great >> and it can be greater.


Stormwater program nears reality in Prince George's

Runoff from storms can floods homeowners' basements, erode property, and damage parks and public spaces. Prince George's County is considering forward-thinking legislation that will strike a good balance between quality of life, density, and design in creating incentives for property owners to deal with stormwater.

Photo by Andrew Bossi on Flickr.

Last Thursday. the Transportation, Housing, and Environment (THE) Committee of the Prince George's County Council unanimously passed a Stormwater Management Retrofit Program. The bill still must be passed by the full Council, but that seems likely.

The proposed program would offer a rebate to individuals, businesses, or non-profits that install certain stormwater retrofits, such as rain barrels, pervious pavers, and rain gardens, on their property. Retrofits like these are win-win because in addition to reducing damaging stormwater runoff, they also create a more attractive property where more people want to shop, live, and work.

Similar, highly successful programs already exist in DC and Montgomery County, so this piece of legislation would keep Prince George's competitive in the region.

Casey Trees found that "people are willing to travel farther, visit more frequently and pay more for goods and services in business districts with trees—on average 12 percent more." A study in Philadelphia showed that improvements to streetscapes, such as street trees and other plantings, can increase home values by as much as 25%.

These programs are just as popular with the public as they are with policy wonks. DC's RiverSmart Homes program has been so successful that homeowners now must wait 3 to 4 months after applying just for an initial audit.

Witnesses at the hearing did express concerns about maintenance of the projects and how low-income residents could overcome the upfront cost. Department of Environmental Resources (DER) director Sam Wynkoop suggested that the projects be subject to a permit or have maintenance agreements recorded in property records.

While these retrofits clearly work best when maintained, such requirements would be so burdensome that they would scare off property owners from even starting. A simple landowner maintenance agreement, that would be signed and kept on file by DER as a pre-condition for receipt of rebate funds, would be one effective tool to ensure that proper maintenance happens.

Because this is a rebate program, property owners will need to pay for the project installation out of pocket, and then be reimbursed. Councilmember Karen Toles expressed concern that this cost could be prohibitive for many low-income residents. However, resources to overcome this barrier already exist in the county; nonprofit organizations like the Watershed Stewards Academy could perform the work and receive the rebate directly.

The bill will go before the full council on July 24th and seems headed for passage. The evolving environmental leadership in Prince George's bodes well for the county where much of our region's development will occur over the next decade.

Brent Bolin is a community activist and non-profit executive with a background in environmental law, science, and policy. He is passionate about social justice, clean water, sustainable urbanism, and the Anacostia River. Brent served on the city council in Mount Rainier, MD and (rarely) blogs about local development issues


Add a comment »

I wonder how they deal with HOA rules in this legislation. My HOA explicitly forbids rain barrels in the front of the house. And the configuration in the back is such that rain barrels do not fit.

by Jasper on Jun 21, 2012 3:58 pm • linkreport

The bill looks good, but it's a shame that it singles out permeable pavers for a credit, instead of considering porous asphalt, pervious concrete, grasspave, and other LEED-recognized permeable paving solutions.

by T. Carter Ross on Jun 21, 2012 5:01 pm • linkreport

Reading through the bill, I'm not sure it would allow community groups to do work for others and then get reimbursed, as the article states. Sec. 32-201.03(d) limits reimbursements for 501(c)3s to work done "that benefit the community and are located on public property." Still, the council should more forward with this bill.

by T. Carter Ross on Jun 21, 2012 5:28 pm • linkreport

@T. Carter Ross: Astute observation! The section of the bill you identified has been expanded via amendment to increase the possibilities. The amendments are not reflected in the version of the bill available online.

by Brent Bolin on Jun 21, 2012 8:28 pm • linkreport

I'm having a hard time understanding this based on reading the bill. It says that the program starts in FY14 (July 2013, right?), except for rain barrels, but I can't tell when the rain barrel rebates would start -- earlier, or later? Also, what does "Urban Tree Canopy" mean? How "urban" would my property need to be to satisfy this?

by Jon on Jun 21, 2012 9:04 pm • linkreport

@Jon: A lot of the particulars will be worked out by PG DER as part of program implementation.

by Brent Bolin on Jun 21, 2012 9:06 pm • linkreport

@Brent Bolin: Great! Is that both the permeable paving options and the ability of 501(c)3s to work on private property that have been amended?

by T. Carter Ross on Jun 22, 2012 11:42 am • linkreport

I guess I will wait until this has passed before I buy my rainbarrel!

by Kamantha on Jun 22, 2012 11:55 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

You can use some HTML, like <blockquote>quoting another comment</blockquote>, <i>italics</i>, and <a href="http://url_here">hyperlinks</a>. More here.

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.


Support Us