Meta
Want to write about Virginia?
Over the last few days, Dave Murphy has posted several articles on transit and highways in Montgomery and Prince George's Counties. Cavan Wilk writes frequently about development and land use, particularly around Wheaton. Meanwhile, many transportation and development debates are happening in Arlington, Alexandria, Fairfax and Loudoun, but we're not covering them in nearly the same depth.
We are looking for contributors to help fill that gap. If you follow land use and transportation in any part of Northern Virginia, share Greater Greater Washington's belief in encouraging walkable, transit-oriented communities, and would like to share your news and commentary with thousands of readers, please email info@ggwash.org. All contributors are volunteers, but it's a great opportunity to share your thoughts with thousands of readers.
Feel free to also contact me with any other content you'd be interested in contributing. Northern Virginia is the biggest area, but I'd love to see more coverage of Prince George's County, DC neighborhoods especially in Wards 4, 5, 7, and 8, and even other topics, like education and public safety, that influence whether people of all income levels, ages, professions, races and backgrounds can live and enjoy our walkable urban areas.
 | David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater.   |
Comments
- Metro bag searches aren't always optional
- Young kids try to assault me while biking
- Focus transportation on downtown or neighborhoods?
- Redeveloping McMillan is the only way to save it
- Endless zoning update delay hurts homeowners
- DDOT agrees to repave 15th Street cycle track
- Vienna Metro town center won't have a town center
A utopian vision of a transit system that is clean, cheap, accessible and feeds starving children in Africa is great, but money talks and BS walks.
The local Democrats just wanna make sure the blacks vote for them. They'll throw them a bone while they get to work on the Silver Line and listen to (rich) people in Bethesda bitch about losing their running trails (oh the humanity)
by Economic Geography on Dec 29, 2008 12:24 am • link • report
I am of European descent, I live in Prince George's County, and I am wholly offended by your simplistic characterization of where I live. I can only assume that this xenophobic overview of the area implies that you rarely if ever visit PG or eastern DC. PG County is predominantly African-American, yes, but to imply that interest should not be taken in this region for that reason is downright racist.
Your characterization of abject poverty is also incredibly unsettling. No, PG does not have the levels of affluence of Montgomery or Howard counties, but the median average household income is greater than the Maryland average:
http://tinyurl.com/7ojng7
PG County is also said to have the highest concentration of wealth among minorities in the United States.
As for breaking ground in Oxon Hill, perhaps you might want to visit National Harbor (http://nationalharbor.com), the high end mixed use development on the Potomac River in Oxon Hill that opened this past spring.
Perhaps there is some merit to your bleak statement on the political situation in PG and eastern DC, but I might consider this to be all the more reason it is important that we address issues with these regions on a public forum.
by Dave Murphy on Dec 29, 2008 1:34 am • link • report
Dave: One can imply racism without implying endorsement of it. The demographic statements seem to be pretty reasonably generalizations outside of Capitol Hill, though of course all generalizations need to be taken with a grain of salt. Welcome to Reason 1 why mixed-income residential areas are valuable for the health of a city, even in a postracial era: because they don't end up being neglected for lack of campaign contributions, developers, & lawyers like segregated-income areas do.
by Squalish on Dec 29, 2008 4:00 am • link • report
by FourthandEye on Dec 29, 2008 8:01 am • link • report
As David said, there are actually just as many local and regional transportation/urbanism issues on the eastern side of our region. It would be great to hear more from there.
by Cavan on Dec 29, 2008 9:33 am • link • report
Why did the Red line get finished before the Green Line (a 20 year difference)? They're both MD/DC lines, so don't say it was something about jurisdiction.
Call me racist or xenophobic or whatever you wanna call me, facts are facts. PG and NE/SE is poorer and blacker than most of the rest of the area and they definitely have less real and planned infrastructure investments.
Idealism is nice, realities are real.
by Economic Geography on Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am • link • report
Have you read Zach Schrag's history of the Washington Metro? It explains in great detail why the green line lagged behind the red line so much. If anything, the delay was thanks to far more planning and care being taken with the green line - to the tune of more mitigation, several re-routes, etc. - than with the Red Line, not to mention the operational concerns that dictated the Red line be the first under construction (yard access, right of way, etc.)
by Alex B. on Dec 29, 2008 11:38 am • link • report
So the Silver Line is built to accommodate Tyson's, fair enough. You just made my point. The transit follows the money. Again, not endorsing it, just saying how it is.
And the National Harbor? Please. MD's yuppie response to Old Town at best. There isn't anything special about that place except they screwed up the view from across the river in VA by tearing out all those trees.
by Economic Geography on Dec 29, 2008 11:56 am • link • report
However, in DC, the Favored Quarter is expanding. Formerly less invested areas like eastern Montgomery County are getting the infrastructure and development.
More importantly, that doesn't mean nothing is happening in these other areas, or that nobody is interested because they're all poor black people. It just means blogs like GGW should work harder to highlight the challenges, opportunities and controversies in those areas, and to encourage projects that span outside the Favored Quarter, like the Purple Line.
As for the Metro history, it's true that the earliest plans were heaviest on Favored Quarter destinations. According to Schrag's book, activists (mostyl African-American leaders) in the mid-city area (like Shaw and Columbia Heights) lobbied for a line in their neighborhoods, largely on economic justice grounds, and got it.
Instead of writing off some areas and their leaders, we should work to improve decisionmaking and push for more and better investment in neglected parts of our region.
by David Alpert on Dec 29, 2008 12:10 pm • link • report
Because planning for the Green line didn't start until much later.
Originally Metro was only going to have two trunk downtown subway tubes (Red and Orange/Blue). Green was added fairly late in the process, specifically because folks noticed Mid City wasn't well served.
by BeyondDC on Dec 29, 2008 5:46 pm • link • report
Add a Comment