Public Spaces
Southwest Ecodistrict would repair 1960s damage
One day, disjointed streets and lifeless blocks around L'Enfant Plaza could become a complete neighborhood with a connected street grid, park space, mixed-use buildings, a museum and more.
That's the vision of the Southwest Ecodistrict plan from the National Capital Planning Commission and a companion plan focusing on Maryland Avenue, SW by the DC Office of Planning.
It is one of DC's greatest ironies that the name "L'Enfant Plaza" was given to an area where L'Enfant's original street grid is least intact. The railroad took over parts of Maryland and Virginia Avenues before 1888, and later projects to grade-separate the rails created a patchwork of roadways at different levels that don't connect to one another.
The federal government razed every building in the area as misguided urban renewal in the 1960s. The extension of 10th Street known as the L'Enfant Promenade was originally designed as a pedestrian mall for cultural buildings, but turned into a largely vehicular roadway between government office buildings. The "12th Street Expressway", a set of off-ramps from I-395, also divides the blocks on either side.
Now, NCPC wants to fix these mistakes from its forerunner, the National Capital Park and Planning Commission, and other federal agencies of the day. On Thursday, it released a draft of its plan for public comment.
Redevelop the Forrestal building
A centerpiece of the plan is a proposal to ultimately redevelop the Department of Energy's Forrestal complex, a mid-century concrete structure that spans 10th Street and cuts off views from the Smithsonian Castle. While historic preservation officials have been landmarking many federal buildings of this type, in this case they prefer to restore the view than keep the building.
That will create many opportunities to right numerous mistakes of that era. The buildings replacing Forrestal, which the plan dubs "Independence Quarter," could also restore the viewshed along Virginia Avenue to the Washington Monument. Despite opening up these views, there's plenty of room to build something with more space than the current complex. That means it could accommodate DOE and also add residences, making the area lively more of the day and bringing in money to fund the project.
The new buildings could narrow 10th Street back to a width more resembling its role in the L'Enfant Plan, which could accommodate vehicles, sidewalks, bicycles and sidewalk cafes without the enormous expanse of sun-baked concrete of the current "promenade." The entire street would gain many more trees along its length.
These new buildings, and many others in the district, would incorporate state-of-the-art stormwater handling, energy efficiency, waste management, green roofs and more to create an eco-friendly district. A heating and electricity plant, which currently only serves federal buildings, could be rehabilitated to a more modern and energy-efficient system and serve the private buildings as well as federal buildings in the area.
Make Banneker Park more appealing and give it a museum
At the end of the promenade is Banneker Park, a hillside with an attractive fountain and some grass but little else to draw people. Curving freeway ramps on and off of the adjacent Southwest Freeway cut up the park, linking a traffic oval around the fountain to the freeway and nearby 9th Street.
The plan proposes to straighten out those ramps, so that the off-ramp from I-395 skirts just the edge and reaches a new intersection with 9th Street, while an extension of G Street links 9th to the central oval and 10th Street.
The rest of the park would get a redesign to give it more of a sense of place and a more inviting atmosphere. On part of the site, NCPC proposes placing one of the many museums that groups want to build on the Mall. According to project manager Beth Miller, museums haven't wanted to go there yet because it "doesn't have a setting befitting a national museum." The plan aims to give it that setting.
The plan says that some have suggested building some underground parking for the tour buses that currently idle in surrounding streets, clog the roads and pollute the air for residents and workers. The plan notes that underground parking could be a good idea, but it might also conflict with a museum's security needs depending on the type of museum, and that the museum is a higher priority.
There is also space underneath the 10th Street promenade for parking now, and the plan suggests putting some tour bus parking there as well as stormwater cisterns.
New buildings would deck the freeway and fill in elsewhere
NCPC proposes decking over I-395 between the 12th Street off-ramp and 9th Street with new buildings. These could create more opportunities for mixed-use living and offices and connect the pedestrian realm along 9th and 10th, including the all-important walk to the new museum.
Farther east, the freeway rises and there isn't room to place buildings over the freeway at street level, the plan says, but it suggests covering the trench with an array of solar panels.
Finally, the plan would rebuild the grid in this area. That ties into the District's Maryland Avenue Small Area, which we'll discuss in part 2.
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Parklets give every block a little park
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools











by Thayer-D on Jul 16, 2012 10:06 am • link • report
1) tear down the HQ of a major goverment agency
2) deck over 2 blocks of 395
3) move some on-ramps
4) change the heating and electric plant
I'd say somewhere around 5 billion?
by charlie on Jul 16, 2012 10:15 am • link • report
Also, a lot of bike traffic comes over the path from the Case Bridge that empties into Banneker Park, so this should be a consideration as well.
by Joe in SS on Jul 16, 2012 10:25 am • link • report
http://jdland.com/dc/files/SouthCapitolStreetGateway-and-ImprovementStudy.pdf
by Tom Coumaris on Jul 16, 2012 10:32 am • link • report
by Michael Perkins on Jul 16, 2012 10:49 am • link • report
by Adam L on Jul 16, 2012 11:02 am • link • report
by egk on Jul 16, 2012 11:26 am • link • report
And next, 9th Street - if not an actual street, at least a continuous pedestrian pathway between the Waterfront and Independence Avenue. And better access to the L'Enfant Plaza Metro station from points south.
A while back, my brother and I spent the better part of an hour trying to walk from 9th and Maine to the Air & Space Museums. Lots of dead-end pathways and we were also trying to help some Swedish tourists find an entrance to the subway station - the shopping center entrance and others were closed on weekends.
by Frank IBC on Jul 16, 2012 11:51 am • link • report
by Frank IBC on Jul 16, 2012 11:56 am • link • report
by dano on Jul 16, 2012 11:59 am • link • report
Which Hoover building? Herbert or J. Edgar?
by David C on Jul 16, 2012 12:04 pm • link • report
by Steve S. on Jul 16, 2012 12:04 pm • link • report
by Frank IBC on Jul 16, 2012 12:10 pm • link • report
by charlie on Jul 16, 2012 12:14 pm • link • report
by Nicoli on Jul 16, 2012 1:06 pm • link • report
by Erik Bootsma on Jul 16, 2012 1:09 pm • link • report
by charlie on Jul 16, 2012 1:12 pm • link • report
Hoover Building... DoE... so easy to get confused.
by Frank IBC on Jul 16, 2012 1:18 pm • link • report
by charlie on Jul 16, 2012 1:49 pm • link • report
--------
Let me make sure I have this straight.
"Historic preservasion officials" (whoever they are) intend to spend millions to raze a perfectly functional building and relocate several thousand workers to "restore" a view that MOST people alive today have never seen and have no memory of.
I realize that "views" are sacrosanct in DC - the perpetual arguments over building height and scale are cases in point. But to tear down a building to CREATE a long-forgotten view is beyond ridiculous.
by ceefer66 on Jul 16, 2012 2:35 pm • link • report
by ceefer66 on Jul 16, 2012 2:37 pm • link • report
by kk on Jul 16, 2012 2:55 pm • link • report
by Tom Veil on Jul 16, 2012 3:02 pm • link • report
by Michael on Jul 16, 2012 4:48 pm • link • report
by Frank IBC on Jul 16, 2012 5:49 pm • link • report
by selxic on Jul 16, 2012 5:53 pm • link • report
As for Crystal City, some of the existing buildings are being redeveloped with new exteriors. 220 S. 20th St. is a good example. 1400 Crystal Drive is currently being renovated. 1900 Crystal Drive might be renovated soon. (That building currently has the address of 1851 S. Bell St.) The older CC buildings can be drab but those are gradually being replaced, in accordance with the long-term sector plan.
by Michael H. on Jul 16, 2012 7:14 pm • link • report
Don't diminish Banneker park!
by Chris on Jul 19, 2012 12:00 pm • link • report
by GWJ on Jul 23, 2012 10:54 am • link • report
Add a Comment