Roads
Let's declare war on calling transportation arguments "war"
Maryland Politics Watch has a roundup of the Purple Line debate with the inflammatory headline "MTA Declares War on Chevy Chase." In the lede, MPW's Adam Pagnucco calls the DEIS "a Declaration of War on rail opponents in the Town of Chevy Chase."
As far as I know, the MTA does not want to kill, maim, or take as prisoner any rail opponents in Chevy Chase, nor do they want to destroy the town or force it to sign a peace treaty. Instead, they simply want to build a train line. In fact, the residents of Chevy Chase are even allowed to ride it! Can we stop with the inflammatory "war" rhetoric please?
There's a word for not accepting the town's arguments: "disagreement." Is the Town of Chevy Chase "declaring war" on North Chevy Chase, because North Chevy Chase greatly dislikes the Town of Chevy Chase's Jones Bridge bus alternative?
In other war news, Virginian officials reacted with some understandable dismay to the closing of almost all Potomac bridges to auto traffic. Always eager to inflame the car-pedestrian divide, AAA's Lon Anderson and a few community email list participants trotted out the Civil War analogies. And always eager to play along, the Post's Eric "War on Drivers" Weiss wrote a whole article about it.
Reader Stephen Miller just submitted a post about AAA's reaction. He wrote,
The bottom line is that two million people are going to crowd the Mall for the nation's largest gathering ever and AAA thinks we should leave the bridges open for private auto traffic. The issue isn't, as AAA frames it, "security impinging on mobility." Sure, the security will restrict car mobility. But if it weren't, the traffic would even more severely restrict the mobility of the other 1.8 million people not in private cars. As Beyond DC notes, the issue is efficiency. With two million people cramming the Mall, where does AAA think the cars are going to go?Think of it this way: 1.3 million people commute to Manhattan daily, and most of them don't drive because, if they did, the traffic and parking would be insane. Now imagine almost twice that many people cramming into a space the size of Central Park. Still, AAA thinks that everyone should be able to drive their own car to downtown DC, if they wanted to.
Obviously cars can be a useful and often necessary way of getting around, but this Inauguration is an extraordinary situation. Yet when faced with reality, AAA sticks to dogma about keeping as many automobile lanes as possible open at all times.
(And if you find AAA's stance unreasonable, there are alternative car clubs, competitive on cost and quality. Try Better World Club, which the Car Talk guys recommended over AAA since it doesn't lobby for highways.)
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- PG planners propose bold new smart growth future
- Prince George's County struggles to get trails right







by Froggie on Jan 12, 2009 4:49 pm • link • report
That Post article is pure irrationality-indulging trash.
by Reid on Jan 12, 2009 5:00 pm • link • report
by Ward 1 Guy on Jan 12, 2009 5:36 pm • link • report
by Ben Ross on Jan 12, 2009 7:04 pm • link • report
by RJ on Jan 12, 2009 7:37 pm • link • report
by BeyondDC on Jan 13, 2009 12:47 am • link • report
I think the only way we'll see less than a July 4th celebration (~300,000 visitors) is if it occurs in the deposition phase of a strong ice storm which takes out the powergrid, Metrorail, & highways. I would put the 5%-95% error bounds of my guess at 500k-5million. Either way, I suspect around 2-3 million area residents will be deciding right before the event, based on crowd sizes & weather.
by Squalish on Jan 13, 2009 1:28 am • link • report
by RJ on Jan 13, 2009 9:24 am • link • report
by rg on Jan 13, 2009 9:52 am • link • report
Add a Comment