The Washington, DC region is great >> and it can be greater.


Give DDOT your parking feedback in person and online

DDOT's new parking manager, Angelo Rao, genuinely wants your input on parking in DC. Please give him your thoughts through an online survey, and please try to attend one of the upcoming "Parking Think Tanks."

Photo by phot0matt on Flickr.

The "Think Tanks" are public meetings where residents talk directly to DDOT officials about their thoughts on parking issues. DDOT has already had 3, at Judiciary Square, Minnesota-Benning, and Anacostia. 3 more are coming up, in the West End on Wednesday 10/3, Tenleytown on Thursday 10/4, and Mount Pleasant on Saturday 10/20.

You don't have to live in the specific neighborhoods to attend; that is just where the meetings are located. It is very helpful if you can make it. Parking meetings often primarily draw residents who park on-street near their homes. They definitely deserve to be heard, but so should residents who don't own cars, who occasionally use car sharing, who sometimes drive to busy neighborhoods for dinner, who have kids, or whose business involves traveling to many neighborhoods, sometimes by car, and many more.

The survey asks if you live on a block with Resident Permit Parking (RPP) and if you or guests use the visitor placards (VPP) DDOT has been piloting for the last few years. It also asks about whether you or your guests use bicycle parking. For each topic, the survey solicits your comments on what might not be working and any suggestions.

Use books of day passes for visitors

Feel free to say whatever you'd like on the survey, but I would encourage residents, especially those in denser neighborhoods, to ask DDOT to find a better solution than the annual visitor placards. Mailing an unlimited-use annual pass to every household is dangerous. We already have heard stories of people who don't need theirs giving them to other people who commute. It is likely to bring in more cars competing for already-limited curbside space, and creates an entitlement that will be very hard to reverse in the future.

On our last parking discussion, commenter ah made a sensible suggestion: a booklet of day "coupons." Each household receives one, and can get more; the best system would be to charge some fee for additional books. This could work with an actual, physical book, or an electronic system that keeps track.

In neighborhoods where parking is relatively plentiful, these extra books can be fairly cheap. In higher-demand areas, they could cost more, in order to keep the number of visitors to a manageable level that preserves parking space for others.

Books also give more flexibility than placards. What if you have 2 guests, or a whole bunch for a party? With a coupon book or the electronic equivalent, it's easy to give multiple coupons to multiple guests. Books could also solve many of the problems with firefighters and teachers needing to park: make them eligible to buy books as if they were residents.

Make performance parking work, for real

Over 4 years after the DC Council set up performance parking, DDOT has been very slow to adjust meter rates based on demand. The latest budget requires DDOT to expand performance parking citywide.

They need to make it work in Columbia Heights and the ballpark district, where it started, and on the newer zone on H Street. They need to set it up downtown and in Georgetown, where many have been clamoring for performance parking in places where people circle far too much to find a space.

Fix RPP's intra-ward commuting and limited hours

The Resident Permit Parking (RPP) system has generally achieved its goal of preventing people from driving into neighborhoods to commute, with a few exceptions. Some commuters drive to other neighborhoods within their own ward and park to use the Metro.

As demand rises in commercial corridors and performance parking sets meter rates more appropriately, people will try harder to park on residential blocks. DDOT has responded to this by reserving one side of many streets for residents only and lengthening RPP hours, though this creates new obstacles for people having dinner parties.

A simple market-based solution can work here too: Charge for non-residents to park outside RPP hours on resident blocks that have high parking demand. The pay-by-phone system can make this easy. Just charge more than the meters in the nearby commercial corridor. If space is available, people will prefer to park near the businesses they are going to. Unused space in the residential blocks can help meet the demand and raise revenue for neighborhood needs at the same time.

An RPP sticker still costs the same in any neighborhood in the city, but the relative supply and demand is not the same. A better RPP system would price stickers by neighborhood, based on that neighborhood's individual needs and circumstances.

What other methods do you think DDOT could employ to better manage its limited curbside space in a way that helps everyone?

David Alpert is the founder of Greater Greater Washington and its board president. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He now lives with his wife and two children in Dupont Circle. 


Add a comment »

My pet peeve about DC parking meters - those awful, confusing signs indicating the hours and days of use.

by Frank IBC on Sep 25, 2012 12:51 pm • linkreport

If we get to the point of doing RPP by neighborhood I can't wait to endure all the wailing and gnashing of teeth as DDOT will now formally define neighborhoods.

"Why would you say I live in Columbia heights when I clearly live in Adams Morgan!"

and so on.

by drumz on Sep 25, 2012 1:06 pm • linkreport

DDOT could easily devise a useful parameter for neighborhoods (say 5 blocks square) and number them to prevent the "I live in that neighborhood, not this one" syndrome. While this may seem artificial and contrived, so are the 'real' neighborhood boundaries.

by Thad on Sep 25, 2012 1:44 pm • linkreport

DC already sets out neighborhoods formally, they're called ANCs. You can use those to delineate RPP zones, perhaps allowing two zones for border streets as they already are (e.g. T St. NW used to be Zone 1 and Zone 2).

by Mony on Sep 25, 2012 2:59 pm • linkreport

I like many of David's suggestions and will advocate for them. On the point about the zone parking, something like this will make the redistricting process that much more contentious.

The issue we have on our street is that the RPP enforcement times are different than the meter enforcement. Thus, drivers will often choose to park in the RPP zones to avoid paying the meters. Simply calibrating these enforcement periods on affected streets would make a big difference.

by Andrew on Sep 25, 2012 3:06 pm • linkreport

I'm all for demand-responsive pricing for parking in commercial areas with high demand, and I'm glad that people in DC are thinking about this, but variable pricing for RESIDENTIAL PERMITS is a sketchy concept and shouldn't be pursued. Basically, if a working person somehow have swung a way to live in, say, Woodley Park, I'm going to be priced out of parking near my house? Ain't right...

I do like the idea of demand-responsive short-term parking on side streets, but the issue there will be that the prices will have to be considerably higher (e.g. clearing rate at 40% open vs. 15% open to account for permit parkers). Does DDOT have the political will to maintain such pricing?

by Vinnie on Sep 25, 2012 5:25 pm • linkreport

drumz, if you take the survey you'll see that DC has already defined neighborhoods. You can find out which one you live in at

by David C on Sep 25, 2012 5:26 pm • linkreport

i agree with FrankIBC -- the new signs are HORRIBLY confusing about when you need to pay to park. I learned only by getting a ticket, as the signs are so very, very unclear.

by dcseain on Sep 28, 2012 11:42 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

You can use some HTML, like <blockquote>quoting another comment</blockquote>, <i>italics</i>, and <a href="http://url_here">hyperlinks</a>. More here.

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.


Support Us